乌托邦没有学校:约翰·杜威的民主教育

Q2 Arts and Humanities Education and Culture Pub Date : 2015-12-18 DOI:10.1353/EAC.2015.0013
Ian T. E. Deweese-Boyd
{"title":"乌托邦没有学校:约翰·杜威的民主教育","authors":"Ian T. E. Deweese-Boyd","doi":"10.1353/EAC.2015.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“The most utopian thing in Utopia is that there are no schools,” writes John Dewey (1933/1989, 136). With these words, Dewey opened his talk to kindergarten teachers on April 21, 1933 at Teachers College, Columbia University. Published a couple days later in the New York Times under the title, “Dewey Outlines Utopian Schools,” we find Dewey in this little-discussed talk fancifully imagining himself among the Utopians—somehow transported from the economically depressed United States of the 1930s to Utopia, where the economy of acquisition is nothing but a memory.1 Finding himself in Utopia, Dewey, of course, asks about the schools, quizzing the Utopians on everything from their pedagogy to their educational goals. What he discovers is a radical critique of education as it was (and still is) often practiced. The emphasis on standards and the competitive and punitive systems of examinations that enforce them appear deeply misguided to the Utopians. They contend that it is our economic system and its emphasis on “personal acquisition and private possession” that has reduced education to the mere acquisition of facts, necessary for the further acquisition of things. According to the Utopians, once their acquisitive economy had passed away, education itself was transformed, liberated in a way that enabled teachers to concentrate their attention on identifying and developing the unique capacities of each student. Instead of a single-minded focus on delivering the facts of the curriculum, the Utopians were able to see the child as the gravitational center of the educational enterprise. The contemporary conversation about education in America, and in many other western educational contexts, could not be further from this vision. American society is more driven by acquisition than ever, and its children are exposed to an unprecedented onslaught of advertising aimed at training them in the practice of consumption.2 In school, the same children are scrutinized by high-stakes, standardized examinations that stand as the goal and measure of learning. Education itself—in","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":"220 1","pages":"69 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"There Are No Schools in Utopia: John Dewey’s Democratic Education\",\"authors\":\"Ian T. E. Deweese-Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/EAC.2015.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“The most utopian thing in Utopia is that there are no schools,” writes John Dewey (1933/1989, 136). With these words, Dewey opened his talk to kindergarten teachers on April 21, 1933 at Teachers College, Columbia University. Published a couple days later in the New York Times under the title, “Dewey Outlines Utopian Schools,” we find Dewey in this little-discussed talk fancifully imagining himself among the Utopians—somehow transported from the economically depressed United States of the 1930s to Utopia, where the economy of acquisition is nothing but a memory.1 Finding himself in Utopia, Dewey, of course, asks about the schools, quizzing the Utopians on everything from their pedagogy to their educational goals. What he discovers is a radical critique of education as it was (and still is) often practiced. The emphasis on standards and the competitive and punitive systems of examinations that enforce them appear deeply misguided to the Utopians. They contend that it is our economic system and its emphasis on “personal acquisition and private possession” that has reduced education to the mere acquisition of facts, necessary for the further acquisition of things. According to the Utopians, once their acquisitive economy had passed away, education itself was transformed, liberated in a way that enabled teachers to concentrate their attention on identifying and developing the unique capacities of each student. Instead of a single-minded focus on delivering the facts of the curriculum, the Utopians were able to see the child as the gravitational center of the educational enterprise. The contemporary conversation about education in America, and in many other western educational contexts, could not be further from this vision. American society is more driven by acquisition than ever, and its children are exposed to an unprecedented onslaught of advertising aimed at training them in the practice of consumption.2 In school, the same children are scrutinized by high-stakes, standardized examinations that stand as the goal and measure of learning. Education itself—in\",\"PeriodicalId\":37095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Culture\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/EAC.2015.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/EAC.2015.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“乌托邦中最乌托邦的东西就是没有学校,”约翰·杜威(John Dewey, 1933/1989, 136)写道。1933年4月21日,杜威在哥伦比亚大学师范学院向幼儿园老师们发表演讲。几天后,这篇文章以“杜威勾勒乌托邦学派”为题发表在《纽约时报》上。在这篇鲜有讨论的演讲中,我们发现杜威幻想着自己置身于乌托邦之中——不知怎的,他从20世纪30年代经济萧条的美国来到了乌托邦,在那里,获取经济只不过是一种记忆杜威发现自己身处乌托邦,当然,他询问学校的情况,询问乌托邦主义者从他们的教学法到他们的教育目标的一切问题。他所发现的是一种对教育的激进批判,因为它曾经(现在仍然)经常被实践。对于乌托邦主义者来说,对标准的强调以及强制执行这些标准的竞争性和惩罚性考试制度似乎被深深误导了。他们认为,正是我们的经济体系及其对“个人获取和私人占有”的强调,将教育降低为仅仅获取事实,而这是进一步获取事物所必需的。根据乌托邦主义者的说法,一旦他们的贪婪经济消失,教育本身就会转变,以一种使教师能够集中注意力识别和发展每个学生的独特能力的方式得到解放。乌托邦主义者没有一心一意地把重点放在传授课程的知识上,而是把孩子视为教育事业的重心。当代关于美国教育的讨论,以及许多其他西方教育背景下的讨论,都与这一观点相去甚远。美国社会比以往任何时候都更受获取的驱动,它的孩子们面临着前所未有的广告冲击,这些广告旨在训练他们进行消费实践在学校里,同样是这些孩子,他们受到高风险的标准化考试的审视,这些考试是学习的目标和衡量标准。教育本身
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
There Are No Schools in Utopia: John Dewey’s Democratic Education
“The most utopian thing in Utopia is that there are no schools,” writes John Dewey (1933/1989, 136). With these words, Dewey opened his talk to kindergarten teachers on April 21, 1933 at Teachers College, Columbia University. Published a couple days later in the New York Times under the title, “Dewey Outlines Utopian Schools,” we find Dewey in this little-discussed talk fancifully imagining himself among the Utopians—somehow transported from the economically depressed United States of the 1930s to Utopia, where the economy of acquisition is nothing but a memory.1 Finding himself in Utopia, Dewey, of course, asks about the schools, quizzing the Utopians on everything from their pedagogy to their educational goals. What he discovers is a radical critique of education as it was (and still is) often practiced. The emphasis on standards and the competitive and punitive systems of examinations that enforce them appear deeply misguided to the Utopians. They contend that it is our economic system and its emphasis on “personal acquisition and private possession” that has reduced education to the mere acquisition of facts, necessary for the further acquisition of things. According to the Utopians, once their acquisitive economy had passed away, education itself was transformed, liberated in a way that enabled teachers to concentrate their attention on identifying and developing the unique capacities of each student. Instead of a single-minded focus on delivering the facts of the curriculum, the Utopians were able to see the child as the gravitational center of the educational enterprise. The contemporary conversation about education in America, and in many other western educational contexts, could not be further from this vision. American society is more driven by acquisition than ever, and its children are exposed to an unprecedented onslaught of advertising aimed at training them in the practice of consumption.2 In school, the same children are scrutinized by high-stakes, standardized examinations that stand as the goal and measure of learning. Education itself—in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Culture
Education and Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Would Dewey See/Say Now? China’s Promise 1919 to 2019 A View of Democracy in and for China from a Deweyan Perspective What Will Confucius Say to Dewey? The Students’ Experience Evolution in Chinese Schools Educational Promise Amidst Authoritarian Ambition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1