泰国首个多中心非劣效性研究:亚胺培南/西司他汀在住院患者中的有效性和不良事件

{"title":"泰国首个多中心非劣效性研究:亚胺培南/西司他汀在住院患者中的有效性和不良事件","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Imipenem/cilastatin, a broad-spectrum antibacterial, is reserved for treatment of serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The present study was aimed to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of generic and original imipenem/cilastatin.\n\nMaterials and Methods:A retrospective, multicenter, cohort, non-inferiority study of generic imipenem/cilastatin (Sianem®), and original imipenem/cilastatin (Tienam®) was carried on between November 2017 and September 2020. The centers included Srinagarind Hospital, Taksin Hospital, Nakornping Hospital, Nakhonpathom Hospital, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. The clinically relevant data were retrieved from the medical records on day 3, 7, and 14 after enrollment. A sample size of 260 patients per arm was needed.\n\nResults: There were 214 and 227 medical and surgical patients enrolled in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. Most patients were male and elderly. Comorbidity was observed in 86.6%. The average length of hospital stay was 17 days. At day 14 after enrollment, the favorable outcome in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups were 83.1% and 90.0%, respectively, with no statistical difference. The mortality rates were 3.4% and 2.0% in generic and original imipenem/ cilastatin groups, respectively, with no statistic difference. Serious adverse events were also not significantly different between the two groups at 0.9% and 0.4%.\n\nConclusion: The generic imipenem/cilastatin was non-inferior to the original imipenem/cilastatin in terms of effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized adult patients.\n\nKeywords: Effectiveness; Safety; Adverse events; Generic drug; Imipenem/cilastatin","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Generic and Original Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospitalized Patients: The First Multicenter Non-Inferiority Study in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Imipenem/cilastatin, a broad-spectrum antibacterial, is reserved for treatment of serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The present study was aimed to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of generic and original imipenem/cilastatin.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods:A retrospective, multicenter, cohort, non-inferiority study of generic imipenem/cilastatin (Sianem®), and original imipenem/cilastatin (Tienam®) was carried on between November 2017 and September 2020. The centers included Srinagarind Hospital, Taksin Hospital, Nakornping Hospital, Nakhonpathom Hospital, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. The clinically relevant data were retrieved from the medical records on day 3, 7, and 14 after enrollment. A sample size of 260 patients per arm was needed.\\n\\nResults: There were 214 and 227 medical and surgical patients enrolled in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. Most patients were male and elderly. Comorbidity was observed in 86.6%. The average length of hospital stay was 17 days. At day 14 after enrollment, the favorable outcome in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups were 83.1% and 90.0%, respectively, with no statistical difference. The mortality rates were 3.4% and 2.0% in generic and original imipenem/ cilastatin groups, respectively, with no statistic difference. Serious adverse events were also not significantly different between the two groups at 0.9% and 0.4%.\\n\\nConclusion: The generic imipenem/cilastatin was non-inferior to the original imipenem/cilastatin in terms of effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized adult patients.\\n\\nKeywords: Effectiveness; Safety; Adverse events; Generic drug; Imipenem/cilastatin\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.08.13876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:亚胺培南/西司他汀是一种广谱抗菌药物,用于治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的严重感染。本研究旨在比较仿制药和原厂亚胺培南/西司他汀的疗效和不良事件。材料与方法:2017年11月至2020年9月,对仿制亚胺培南/西司他汀(Sianem®)和原亚胺培南/西司他汀(Tienam®)进行回顾性、多中心、队列、非劣效性研究。这些中心包括斯利那加林德医院、他信医院、Nakornping医院、Nakhonpathom医院和朱拉隆功国王纪念医院。在入组后第3、7、14天从病历中检索临床相关数据。每组需要260例患者的样本量。结果:非专利组和原亚胺培南/西司他汀组分别纳入214例和227例内科和外科患者。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。患者多为男性和老年人。共病发生率为86.6%。平均住院时间为17天。入组后第14天,亚胺培南/西司他汀仿制组和原亚胺培南/西司他汀组的良好预后分别为83.1%和90.0%,差异无统计学意义。仿制组和原亚胺培南/西司他汀组的死亡率分别为3.4%和2.0%,差异无统计学意义。两组的严重不良事件发生率也无显著差异,分别为0.9%和0.4%。结论:亚胺培南/西司他汀仿制药治疗成人住院重症细菌感染的疗效和不良事件均不低于原亚胺培南/西司他汀。关键词:有效性;安全;不良事件;仿制药;Imipenem / cilastatin
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Generic and Original Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospitalized Patients: The First Multicenter Non-Inferiority Study in Thailand
Objective: Imipenem/cilastatin, a broad-spectrum antibacterial, is reserved for treatment of serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The present study was aimed to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of generic and original imipenem/cilastatin. Materials and Methods:A retrospective, multicenter, cohort, non-inferiority study of generic imipenem/cilastatin (Sianem®), and original imipenem/cilastatin (Tienam®) was carried on between November 2017 and September 2020. The centers included Srinagarind Hospital, Taksin Hospital, Nakornping Hospital, Nakhonpathom Hospital, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. The clinically relevant data were retrieved from the medical records on day 3, 7, and 14 after enrollment. A sample size of 260 patients per arm was needed. Results: There were 214 and 227 medical and surgical patients enrolled in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. Most patients were male and elderly. Comorbidity was observed in 86.6%. The average length of hospital stay was 17 days. At day 14 after enrollment, the favorable outcome in generic and original imipenem/cilastatin groups were 83.1% and 90.0%, respectively, with no statistical difference. The mortality rates were 3.4% and 2.0% in generic and original imipenem/ cilastatin groups, respectively, with no statistic difference. Serious adverse events were also not significantly different between the two groups at 0.9% and 0.4%. Conclusion: The generic imipenem/cilastatin was non-inferior to the original imipenem/cilastatin in terms of effectiveness and adverse events for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized adult patients. Keywords: Effectiveness; Safety; Adverse events; Generic drug; Imipenem/cilastatin
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1