{"title":"前景动态与损失优势","authors":"Ryoji Sawa, Jiabin Wu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2804852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospect Dynamic and Loss Dominance\",\"authors\":\"Ryoji Sawa, Jiabin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2804852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper investigates the role of loss-aversion in affecting the long-run equilibria of stochastic evolutionary dynamics. We consider a finite population of loss-averse agents who are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player normal form game. When an agent revises her strategy, she compares the payoff from each strategy to a reference point. Based on the comparison, she makes a (possibly stochastic) choice. Under the resulting dynamics, called prospect dynamics, risk-dominance is no longer sufficient to guarantee stochastic stability in 2 by 2 coordination games. We propose a stronger concept, loss-dominance: a strategy is loss-dominant if it is both a risk-dominant strategy and a maximin strategy. This concept captures people's psychological needs to avoid not only risks but also losses. In a 2 by 2 coordination game, the state in which all agents play the loss-dominant strategy (if exists) is uniquely stochastically stable under prospect dynamics for any degree of loss-aversion and all types of reference points. We generalize the concept for symmetric two-player normal form games and show that generalized loss-dominance gives a sufficient condition for stochastic stability with loss-averse agents.