欧盟普通法院确认阿迪达斯的“三条平行等距条纹”欧盟图形商标缺乏显著性

3区 文学 Q3 Arts and Humanities SCRIPTORIUM Pub Date : 2020-08-06 DOI:10.2966/scrip.170220.410
Matteo Mancinella
{"title":"欧盟普通法院确认阿迪达斯的“三条平行等距条纹”欧盟图形商标缺乏显著性","authors":"Matteo Mancinella","doi":"10.2966/scrip.170220.410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Court of the EU confirmed the decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal in relation to the EU figurative trade mark registered by adidas AG, according to which this mark, consisting of “three parallel equidistant stripes”, is devoid of distinctive character. The General Court confirmed that adidas AG had failed to demonstrate use of this mark throughout the EU or that the mark, which is inherently devoid of distinctive character, had, by virtue of that use, come to identify the goods for which it was registered and thus had acquired distinctiveness. The General Court, in reaching this conclusion, relied on its assessment that most of the evidence provided by adidas AG was irrelevant for the purposes of establishing that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use as it was not directly linked to the use of the mark in its registered form. In addition, the General Court recognized that there was nothing in the application of adidas AG to suggest that the registered trade mark could be interpreted as a “pattern mark”. Finally, in relation to the “law of permissible variations”, the General Court stated that because the (2020) 17:2 SCRIPTed 410 411 figurative mark at issue is so simple, even a slight change can alter its distinctiveness.","PeriodicalId":43374,"journal":{"name":"SCRIPTORIUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas’ “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Mancinella\",\"doi\":\"10.2966/scrip.170220.410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The General Court of the EU confirmed the decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal in relation to the EU figurative trade mark registered by adidas AG, according to which this mark, consisting of “three parallel equidistant stripes”, is devoid of distinctive character. The General Court confirmed that adidas AG had failed to demonstrate use of this mark throughout the EU or that the mark, which is inherently devoid of distinctive character, had, by virtue of that use, come to identify the goods for which it was registered and thus had acquired distinctiveness. The General Court, in reaching this conclusion, relied on its assessment that most of the evidence provided by adidas AG was irrelevant for the purposes of establishing that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use as it was not directly linked to the use of the mark in its registered form. In addition, the General Court recognized that there was nothing in the application of adidas AG to suggest that the registered trade mark could be interpreted as a “pattern mark”. Finally, in relation to the “law of permissible variations”, the General Court stated that because the (2020) 17:2 SCRIPTed 410 411 figurative mark at issue is so simple, even a slight change can alter its distinctiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCRIPTORIUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCRIPTORIUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.410\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCRIPTORIUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟普通法院确认了欧盟知识产权局第二上诉委员会关于阿迪达斯公司注册的欧盟形象商标的决定,根据该决定,该商标由“三个平行等距条纹”组成,缺乏显著性。普通法院确认,adidas AG未能证明该商标在整个欧盟范围内的使用,或者该商标本身缺乏显著性,但由于该商标的使用,该商标可以识别其注册的商品,从而获得显著性。普通法院在得出这一结论时,依据的是其评估,即阿迪达斯公司提供的大多数证据与确立商标通过使用获得显著性的目的无关,因为它与商标注册形式的使用没有直接联系。此外,普通法院承认,adidas AG的申请中没有任何迹象表明该注册商标可以被解释为“图案商标”。最后,关于“允许变更法”,普通法院指出,由于争议的(2020)17:2 SCRIPTed 410 411比喻性商标非常简单,即使是轻微的变化也会改变其独特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas’ “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness
The General Court of the EU confirmed the decision of the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal in relation to the EU figurative trade mark registered by adidas AG, according to which this mark, consisting of “three parallel equidistant stripes”, is devoid of distinctive character. The General Court confirmed that adidas AG had failed to demonstrate use of this mark throughout the EU or that the mark, which is inherently devoid of distinctive character, had, by virtue of that use, come to identify the goods for which it was registered and thus had acquired distinctiveness. The General Court, in reaching this conclusion, relied on its assessment that most of the evidence provided by adidas AG was irrelevant for the purposes of establishing that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use as it was not directly linked to the use of the mark in its registered form. In addition, the General Court recognized that there was nothing in the application of adidas AG to suggest that the registered trade mark could be interpreted as a “pattern mark”. Finally, in relation to the “law of permissible variations”, the General Court stated that because the (2020) 17:2 SCRIPTed 410 411 figurative mark at issue is so simple, even a slight change can alter its distinctiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCRIPTORIUM
SCRIPTORIUM Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
arte que nos resta Simulacro e criação brinde às fontes outro sujeito Orides Fontela e a poesia do kairos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1