新兴国家工业企业的智力资本与财务绩效:来自越南的经验证据

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Global Business and Finance Review Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.2.107
Nguyet Thi Nguyen, V. Nghiem
{"title":"新兴国家工业企业的智力资本与财务绩效:来自越南的经验证据","authors":"Nguyet Thi Nguyen, V. Nghiem","doi":"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.2.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study contributes evidence on the impact of IC and its components for emerging countries, the case of Vietnam. \nDesign/methodology/approach: The research measures the value-added intellectual coefficient and applies the two-step system GMM model for the period 2005-2014. \nFindings: Findings imply that IC contributes significantly to the industrial firm performance. Industrial firm performance is positively affected by Human capital efficiency (HCE) and Capital Employed Efficiency (CEE). \nGenerally, Structural capital efficiency (SCE) has an insignificant effect on the industrial firm performance. Impact of IC efficiency depends on the internal and external factors. The impacts of IC efficiencies differ among levels of knowledge intensity. Generally, HCE is more important than CEE. The impact of IC on industrial firm outcomes depends on knowledge intensity levels. The more knowledge intensive, the stronger impact of IC is. Only high knowledge intensive firms benefit from all three components of IC efficiency. HCE and CEE are most effective for firms with high knowledge intensity. SCE is strongest for firms at low knowledge intensity. Only CEE contributes to industrial firms at all knowledge intensity levels. HCE is insignificant for firms at low knowledge intensity, while SCE is insignificant for firms at medium level. \nResearch limitations/implications: The paper examines only one variable representing for firm financial performance, ROA. Controlled variables are only at industrial level, not at broader levels, such as provincial or national levels. \nOriginality/value: Investigating IC will contribute to literature of levels of investment in tangible and intangible assets. It helps firm leaders and policymakers to comprehend the significant role of IC as well as the knowledge economy, then properly reallocate intellectual resources. Firm leaders and policymakers should focus on HCE and CEE which driver significantly value added. The findings suggest firm leaders which component of intellectual capital they should invest corresponding to various level of knowledge intensities.","PeriodicalId":35226,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Finance Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual capital and financial performance of industrial firms in emerging countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Nguyet Thi Nguyen, V. Nghiem\",\"doi\":\"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.2.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study contributes evidence on the impact of IC and its components for emerging countries, the case of Vietnam. \\nDesign/methodology/approach: The research measures the value-added intellectual coefficient and applies the two-step system GMM model for the period 2005-2014. \\nFindings: Findings imply that IC contributes significantly to the industrial firm performance. Industrial firm performance is positively affected by Human capital efficiency (HCE) and Capital Employed Efficiency (CEE). \\nGenerally, Structural capital efficiency (SCE) has an insignificant effect on the industrial firm performance. Impact of IC efficiency depends on the internal and external factors. The impacts of IC efficiencies differ among levels of knowledge intensity. Generally, HCE is more important than CEE. The impact of IC on industrial firm outcomes depends on knowledge intensity levels. The more knowledge intensive, the stronger impact of IC is. Only high knowledge intensive firms benefit from all three components of IC efficiency. HCE and CEE are most effective for firms with high knowledge intensity. SCE is strongest for firms at low knowledge intensity. Only CEE contributes to industrial firms at all knowledge intensity levels. HCE is insignificant for firms at low knowledge intensity, while SCE is insignificant for firms at medium level. \\nResearch limitations/implications: The paper examines only one variable representing for firm financial performance, ROA. Controlled variables are only at industrial level, not at broader levels, such as provincial or national levels. \\nOriginality/value: Investigating IC will contribute to literature of levels of investment in tangible and intangible assets. It helps firm leaders and policymakers to comprehend the significant role of IC as well as the knowledge economy, then properly reallocate intellectual resources. Firm leaders and policymakers should focus on HCE and CEE which driver significantly value added. The findings suggest firm leaders which component of intellectual capital they should invest corresponding to various level of knowledge intensities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.2.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.2.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究以越南为例,提供工业集成电路及其组成部分对新兴国家的影响的证据。设计/方法/途径:本研究采用2005-2014年的两步系统GMM模型,测量增加值智力系数。研究结果:研究结果表明,集成电路对工业企业绩效有显著贡献。人力资本效率(HCE)和资本利用效率(CEE)对产业企业绩效有正向影响。总体而言,结构资本效率对产业企业绩效的影响不显著。IC效率的影响取决于内部和外部因素。不同知识强度对集成电路效率的影响不同。一般来说,HCE比CEE更重要。知识集成对产业企业产出的影响取决于知识强度水平。知识密集程度越高,集成电路的影响越强。只有知识密集型企业才能从集成电路效率的三个组成部分中受益。HCE和CEE对知识强度高的企业最有效。在低知识强度的企业中,SCE最强。只有中东欧在所有知识强度水平上对工业企业都有贡献。低知识强度企业的HCE不显著,中等知识强度企业的SCE不显著。研究局限性/启示:本文只考察了代表公司财务绩效的一个变量,即ROA。控制变量仅在工业层面,而不是在更广泛的层面,如省或国家层面。原创性/价值:调查集成电路将有助于研究有形和无形资产的投资水平。它有助于企业领导者和决策者理解知识集成和知识经济的重要作用,从而正确地重新配置智力资源。企业领导者和政策制定者应该关注HCE和CEE,它们能显著推动附加值。研究结果提示企业领导者在不同的知识强度水平下,应该投资哪一部分的智力资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intellectual capital and financial performance of industrial firms in emerging countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam
Purpose: This study contributes evidence on the impact of IC and its components for emerging countries, the case of Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach: The research measures the value-added intellectual coefficient and applies the two-step system GMM model for the period 2005-2014. Findings: Findings imply that IC contributes significantly to the industrial firm performance. Industrial firm performance is positively affected by Human capital efficiency (HCE) and Capital Employed Efficiency (CEE). Generally, Structural capital efficiency (SCE) has an insignificant effect on the industrial firm performance. Impact of IC efficiency depends on the internal and external factors. The impacts of IC efficiencies differ among levels of knowledge intensity. Generally, HCE is more important than CEE. The impact of IC on industrial firm outcomes depends on knowledge intensity levels. The more knowledge intensive, the stronger impact of IC is. Only high knowledge intensive firms benefit from all three components of IC efficiency. HCE and CEE are most effective for firms with high knowledge intensity. SCE is strongest for firms at low knowledge intensity. Only CEE contributes to industrial firms at all knowledge intensity levels. HCE is insignificant for firms at low knowledge intensity, while SCE is insignificant for firms at medium level. Research limitations/implications: The paper examines only one variable representing for firm financial performance, ROA. Controlled variables are only at industrial level, not at broader levels, such as provincial or national levels. Originality/value: Investigating IC will contribute to literature of levels of investment in tangible and intangible assets. It helps firm leaders and policymakers to comprehend the significant role of IC as well as the knowledge economy, then properly reallocate intellectual resources. Firm leaders and policymakers should focus on HCE and CEE which driver significantly value added. The findings suggest firm leaders which component of intellectual capital they should invest corresponding to various level of knowledge intensities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Business and Finance Review
Global Business and Finance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Key Attributes of Upcycled Food using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach Impact of Accounting Conservatism on the Informativeness of Current Stock Prices for Future Earnings Mediation Effects of Financial Performance between Assets Utilization and the Market Value of Palestinian Listed Firms Structural Relationship between Taste, Price Fairness, and Repurchase Intention of Fast Food: Moderating Effect of Healthiness The Effects of Enterprise Risk Management on the Performance and Risk of Vietnamese Listed Firms: Evidence from Abnormal Enterprise Risk Management Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1