{"title":"有或没有国家处罚的银行资本监管评论","authors":"John H. Boyd","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00046-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a theoretical study of optimal bank regulation in the presence of governmentally provided deposit insurance. The regulator has two policy instruments, a capital requirement and ex-post taxation of bank profits. It is shown that imposing capital standards can frequently improve welfare. However, it is also shown that a combination of capital standards and ex-post taxation often does better than capital standard alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Pages 185-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00046-X","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bank capital regulation with and without state-contingent penalties A comment\",\"authors\":\"John H. Boyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00046-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This is a theoretical study of optimal bank regulation in the presence of governmentally provided deposit insurance. The regulator has two policy instruments, a capital requirement and ex-post taxation of bank profits. It is shown that imposing capital standards can frequently improve welfare. However, it is also shown that a combination of capital standards and ex-post taxation often does better than capital standard alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 185-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00046-X\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016722310100046X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016722310100046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bank capital regulation with and without state-contingent penalties A comment
This is a theoretical study of optimal bank regulation in the presence of governmentally provided deposit insurance. The regulator has two policy instruments, a capital requirement and ex-post taxation of bank profits. It is shown that imposing capital standards can frequently improve welfare. However, it is also shown that a combination of capital standards and ex-post taxation often does better than capital standard alone.