Annika Rotonen, Noora Hirvonen, Maija-Leena Huotari
{"title":"Harvinaissairaiden käsityksiä sairaudesta ja sitä koskevan tiedon kognitiivisista auktoriteeteista","authors":"Annika Rotonen, Noora Hirvonen, Maija-Leena Huotari","doi":"10.23978/inf.111050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines illness representations as viewed by Finnish adults with a hereditary rare disease, and ways these representations manifest in their information behaviour, focusing on the cognitive authority of information sources. Data were gathered with five theme interviews and analysed using theory bound content analysis. The results show that doctors and researchers specialised in rare diseases had a central cognitive authority status among the patients. Additionally, personal expertise and experience, and peer information, particularly of practicalities, were also crucial. Information sources, and information provided by the sources, were significant in constructing illness representations and for controlling the disease. The core information sources and their evaluation varied in different disease phases and along with evolving illness identity. The results cannot be generalised to all Finnish adults with a rare disease but they add knowledge about patients’ views of information sources in a situation where information is scarce. Because of the general lack of information about rare diseases, information supply, information behaviour and information creation are examples of prolific study subjects.","PeriodicalId":32976,"journal":{"name":"Informaatiotutkimus","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informaatiotutkimus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.111050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了芬兰成人遗传病的疾病表征,以及这些表征在其信息行为中的表现方式,重点关注信息源的认知权威。通过五次主题访谈收集数据,并采用理论约束内容分析法进行分析。结果表明,罕见病专科医生和研究人员在患者中具有中心认知权威地位。此外,个人的专门知识和经验以及同行的资料,特别是有关实际情况的资料也很重要。信息源和信息源提供的信息在构建疾病表征和控制疾病方面具有重要意义。核心信息源及其评价在不同的疾病阶段和随着疾病身份的演变而变化。这些结果不能推广到所有患有罕见疾病的芬兰成年人,但它们增加了在信息稀缺的情况下患者对信息来源的看法的知识。由于普遍缺乏关于罕见疾病的信息,信息供应、信息行为和信息创造是大量研究主题的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harvinaissairaiden käsityksiä sairaudesta ja sitä koskevan tiedon kognitiivisista auktoriteeteista
This article examines illness representations as viewed by Finnish adults with a hereditary rare disease, and ways these representations manifest in their information behaviour, focusing on the cognitive authority of information sources. Data were gathered with five theme interviews and analysed using theory bound content analysis. The results show that doctors and researchers specialised in rare diseases had a central cognitive authority status among the patients. Additionally, personal expertise and experience, and peer information, particularly of practicalities, were also crucial. Information sources, and information provided by the sources, were significant in constructing illness representations and for controlling the disease. The core information sources and their evaluation varied in different disease phases and along with evolving illness identity. The results cannot be generalised to all Finnish adults with a rare disease but they add knowledge about patients’ views of information sources in a situation where information is scarce. Because of the general lack of information about rare diseases, information supply, information behaviour and information creation are examples of prolific study subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Yli ajan ja paikan Laadullista ja määrällistä tutkimusta Kreetalla Novel genre explaining borrowings from the public libraries Tuhat uutta tohtoria kolmessa vuodessa Viranomaisten velvollisuus ja mahdollisuudet oikaista virheellistä tietoa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1