F. Bidard, W. Jacot, S. Dureau, E. Brain, T. Bachelot, H. Bourgeois, A. Gonçalves, S. Ladoire, H. Naman, F. Dalenc, J. Gligorov, M. Espié, C. Lévy, J. Ferrero, D. Loirat, P. Cottu, V. Diéras, C. Simondi, F. Berger, C. Alix-Panabières, J. Pierga
{"title":"GS3-07:循环肿瘤细胞计数作为ER+ HER2转移性乳腺癌一线激素治疗和化疗选择工具的临床应用:STIC CTC III期试验结果","authors":"F. Bidard, W. Jacot, S. Dureau, E. Brain, T. Bachelot, H. Bourgeois, A. Gonçalves, S. Ladoire, H. Naman, F. Dalenc, J. Gligorov, M. Espié, C. Lévy, J. Ferrero, D. Loirat, P. Cottu, V. Diéras, C. Simondi, F. Berger, C. Alix-Panabières, J. Pierga","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the clinical choice between 1st line hormone therapy (HT, the recommended option) or chemotherapy (CT) is based on the absence of “visceral crisis” or adverse prognostic factors, with no proven/objective criteria. In that context, STIC CTC (NCT01710605) was set up as a strategy trial to test whether circulating tumor cells (CTC) count could help customize the choice between 1st line HT or CT. Methods: For this multicenter phase 3 non-inferiority trial, the main inclusion criteria were: ER+ HER2- MBC with no prior therapy, PS≤2, no contra-indication to HT or CT and informed consent. The a priori treatment choice (HT or CT) and CTC count (CellSearch®) were obtained in all patients prior to randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 between clinically-driven choice (CTC count not disclosed, HT or CT administered as decided a priori), or a CTC-driven choice (HT if Results: 761 MBC patients were randomized between 02/2012 and 08/2016. Baseline characteristics: 7.8% of patients had a PS=2, 24.1% had a de novo metastatic disease; 63.3% received prior adjuvant HT and 49.9% prior adjuvant CT; 31.3% had ≥3 metastatic sites. A priori treatments (HT or CT) and CTC count ( Conclusion: This trial demonstrates the clinical utility of CTC count as an objective decision tool when considering 1st line therapy in ER+ HER2- MBC. In most patients, CTC count did confirm the a priori clinical choice; however, trial results show that in discrepant cases, CTC count may be trusted for either escalating (i.e. considering CT in patients if high CTC count) or de-escalating (i.e. considering HT in patients if low CTC count) 1st line therapy. Funding: French National Cancer Institute; Menarini Silicon Biosystems. Citation Format: Bidard F-C, Jacot W, Dureau S, Brain E, Bachelot T, Bourgeois H, Goncalves A, Ladoire S, Naman H, Dalenc F, Gligorov J, Espie M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Loirat D, Cottu P, Dieras V, Simondi C, Berger F, Alix-Panabieres C, Pierga J-Y. Clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a tool to chose between first line hormone therapy and chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Results of the phase III STIC CTC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-07.","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract GS3-07: Clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a tool to chose between first line hormone therapy and chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Results of the phase III STIC CTC trial\",\"authors\":\"F. Bidard, W. Jacot, S. Dureau, E. Brain, T. Bachelot, H. Bourgeois, A. Gonçalves, S. Ladoire, H. Naman, F. Dalenc, J. Gligorov, M. Espié, C. Lévy, J. Ferrero, D. Loirat, P. Cottu, V. Diéras, C. Simondi, F. Berger, C. Alix-Panabières, J. Pierga\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the clinical choice between 1st line hormone therapy (HT, the recommended option) or chemotherapy (CT) is based on the absence of “visceral crisis” or adverse prognostic factors, with no proven/objective criteria. In that context, STIC CTC (NCT01710605) was set up as a strategy trial to test whether circulating tumor cells (CTC) count could help customize the choice between 1st line HT or CT. Methods: For this multicenter phase 3 non-inferiority trial, the main inclusion criteria were: ER+ HER2- MBC with no prior therapy, PS≤2, no contra-indication to HT or CT and informed consent. The a priori treatment choice (HT or CT) and CTC count (CellSearch®) were obtained in all patients prior to randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 between clinically-driven choice (CTC count not disclosed, HT or CT administered as decided a priori), or a CTC-driven choice (HT if Results: 761 MBC patients were randomized between 02/2012 and 08/2016. Baseline characteristics: 7.8% of patients had a PS=2, 24.1% had a de novo metastatic disease; 63.3% received prior adjuvant HT and 49.9% prior adjuvant CT; 31.3% had ≥3 metastatic sites. A priori treatments (HT or CT) and CTC count ( Conclusion: This trial demonstrates the clinical utility of CTC count as an objective decision tool when considering 1st line therapy in ER+ HER2- MBC. In most patients, CTC count did confirm the a priori clinical choice; however, trial results show that in discrepant cases, CTC count may be trusted for either escalating (i.e. considering CT in patients if high CTC count) or de-escalating (i.e. considering HT in patients if low CTC count) 1st line therapy. Funding: French National Cancer Institute; Menarini Silicon Biosystems. Citation Format: Bidard F-C, Jacot W, Dureau S, Brain E, Bachelot T, Bourgeois H, Goncalves A, Ladoire S, Naman H, Dalenc F, Gligorov J, Espie M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Loirat D, Cottu P, Dieras V, Simondi C, Berger F, Alix-Panabieres C, Pierga J-Y. Clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a tool to chose between first line hormone therapy and chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Results of the phase III STIC CTC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-07.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Session Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Session Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
摘要
背景:在ER+ HER2-转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者中,一线激素治疗(HT,推荐方案)或化疗(CT)的临床选择是基于“内脏危机”或不良预后因素的缺乏,没有经过证实的/客观的标准。在此背景下,STIC CTC (NCT01710605)作为一项策略试验,旨在测试循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)计数是否有助于定制一线HT或CT的选择。方法:本多中心3期非劣效性试验的主要纳入标准为:ER+ HER2- MBC,无既往治疗,PS≤2,无HT或CT禁忌症,知情同意。在随机化之前,获得所有患者的先验治疗选择(HT或CT)和CTC计数(CellSearch®)。患者按1:1的比例随机分为临床驱动选择(CTC计数未披露,HT或CT按先验决定)和CTC驱动选择(HT)。结果:761名MBC患者在2012年2月至2016年8月间随机分配。基线特征:7.8%的患者PS=2, 24.1%的患者有新发转移性疾病;63.3%接受过辅助HT, 49.9%接受过辅助CT;31.3%有≥3个转移灶。结论:该试验表明,在考虑ER+ HER2- MBC的一线治疗时,CTC计数作为客观决策工具的临床效用。在大多数患者中,CTC计数确实证实了先验的临床选择;然而,试验结果显示,在不一致的病例中,CTC计数可能被认为是升级(即考虑CTC计数高的患者的CT)或降级(即考虑CTC计数低的患者的HT)一线治疗。资助:法国国家癌症研究所;美纳里尼硅生物系统公司。引文格式:Bidard F-C, Jacot W, Dureau S, Brain E, Bachelot T, Bourgeois H, Goncalves A, Ladoire S, Naman H, Dalenc F, Gligorov J, Espie M, Levy C, Ferrero J M, Loirat D, Cottu P, Dieras V, Simondi C, Berger F, Alix-Panabieres C, Pierga J y。循环肿瘤细胞计数作为ER+ HER2转移性乳腺癌一线激素治疗和化疗选择工具的临床应用:STIC CTC III期试验结果[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS3-07。
Abstract GS3-07: Clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a tool to chose between first line hormone therapy and chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Results of the phase III STIC CTC trial
Background: In ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the clinical choice between 1st line hormone therapy (HT, the recommended option) or chemotherapy (CT) is based on the absence of “visceral crisis” or adverse prognostic factors, with no proven/objective criteria. In that context, STIC CTC (NCT01710605) was set up as a strategy trial to test whether circulating tumor cells (CTC) count could help customize the choice between 1st line HT or CT. Methods: For this multicenter phase 3 non-inferiority trial, the main inclusion criteria were: ER+ HER2- MBC with no prior therapy, PS≤2, no contra-indication to HT or CT and informed consent. The a priori treatment choice (HT or CT) and CTC count (CellSearch®) were obtained in all patients prior to randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 between clinically-driven choice (CTC count not disclosed, HT or CT administered as decided a priori), or a CTC-driven choice (HT if Results: 761 MBC patients were randomized between 02/2012 and 08/2016. Baseline characteristics: 7.8% of patients had a PS=2, 24.1% had a de novo metastatic disease; 63.3% received prior adjuvant HT and 49.9% prior adjuvant CT; 31.3% had ≥3 metastatic sites. A priori treatments (HT or CT) and CTC count ( Conclusion: This trial demonstrates the clinical utility of CTC count as an objective decision tool when considering 1st line therapy in ER+ HER2- MBC. In most patients, CTC count did confirm the a priori clinical choice; however, trial results show that in discrepant cases, CTC count may be trusted for either escalating (i.e. considering CT in patients if high CTC count) or de-escalating (i.e. considering HT in patients if low CTC count) 1st line therapy. Funding: French National Cancer Institute; Menarini Silicon Biosystems. Citation Format: Bidard F-C, Jacot W, Dureau S, Brain E, Bachelot T, Bourgeois H, Goncalves A, Ladoire S, Naman H, Dalenc F, Gligorov J, Espie M, Levy C, Ferrero J-M, Loirat D, Cottu P, Dieras V, Simondi C, Berger F, Alix-Panabieres C, Pierga J-Y. Clinical utility of circulating tumor cell count as a tool to chose between first line hormone therapy and chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Results of the phase III STIC CTC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-07.