爱不是盲目的:对配偶偏好的种族等级的调查

M. Rodriguez, G. Disler, Z. Wang, S. Yim, D. Javidi, L. Khalil, J. Wu, Y. Saraf, A. Simanian, K. Venegas-Vasquez, M. Hensley, J. Haydel, J. Li, J. Willis
{"title":"爱不是盲目的:对配偶偏好的种族等级的调查","authors":"M. Rodriguez, G. Disler, Z. Wang, S. Yim, D. Javidi, L. Khalil, J. Wu, Y. Saraf, A. Simanian, K. Venegas-Vasquez, M. Hensley, J. Haydel, J. Li, J. Willis","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/9uzfr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not my type is the usual invocation when rejecting potential lovers who don’t align with the racial hierarchy of mating preferences. The largely unchallenged norm of interracial intimacy aversion, particularly how the desire for some racial groups and rejection of others reinforces existing racial inequities, is inconsistent with the blanket notion of greater interracial acceptance. We contend that this acceptance is unequally divided along the same racial hierarchy that exists in the broader public sphere. Our investigation assessed the openness of monoracial and biracial individuals to form interracial romantic relationships. In addition, we partially replicated an interracial mate preference known as the Multiracial Dividend Effect: a pattern whereby monoracial individuals prefer to date multiracial individuals as these interracial relationships may be less likely to carry the perceived disadvantages of interracially dating someone from another monoracial group. Most monoracial groups equally preferred same-race lovers and interracially dating biracials, and they preferred interracially dating someone biracial over any monoracial group. Lastly, biracials were more open to interracially dating any monoracial group than monoracials were to interracially dating each other.","PeriodicalId":92134,"journal":{"name":"Review of European studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love is Not Colorblind: An Investigation of the Racial Hierarchy of Mate Preferences\",\"authors\":\"M. Rodriguez, G. Disler, Z. Wang, S. Yim, D. Javidi, L. Khalil, J. Wu, Y. Saraf, A. Simanian, K. Venegas-Vasquez, M. Hensley, J. Haydel, J. Li, J. Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/9uzfr\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Not my type is the usual invocation when rejecting potential lovers who don’t align with the racial hierarchy of mating preferences. The largely unchallenged norm of interracial intimacy aversion, particularly how the desire for some racial groups and rejection of others reinforces existing racial inequities, is inconsistent with the blanket notion of greater interracial acceptance. We contend that this acceptance is unequally divided along the same racial hierarchy that exists in the broader public sphere. Our investigation assessed the openness of monoracial and biracial individuals to form interracial romantic relationships. In addition, we partially replicated an interracial mate preference known as the Multiracial Dividend Effect: a pattern whereby monoracial individuals prefer to date multiracial individuals as these interracial relationships may be less likely to carry the perceived disadvantages of interracially dating someone from another monoracial group. Most monoracial groups equally preferred same-race lovers and interracially dating biracials, and they preferred interracially dating someone biracial over any monoracial group. Lastly, biracials were more open to interracially dating any monoracial group than monoracials were to interracially dating each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9uzfr\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9uzfr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“不是我喜欢的类型”是拒绝那些不符合种族择偶偏好等级的潜在恋人时常用的借口。对种族间亲密关系的厌恶,尤其是对某些种族群体的渴望和对其他种族群体的排斥加剧了现有的种族不平等,这在很大程度上没有受到挑战,这与种族间更广泛接受的笼统概念不一致。我们认为,这种接受程度在更广泛的公共领域中存在的种族等级中是不平等的。我们的调查评估了单一种族和混血个体形成跨种族浪漫关系的开放性。此外,我们部分复制了一种被称为多种族红利效应的跨种族伴侣偏好:一种模式,即单一种族的个体更喜欢与多种族的个体约会,因为这些跨种族关系可能不太可能带来与另一个单一种族群体的人进行跨种族约会的明显缺点。大多数单种族群体同样喜欢同种族恋人和跨种族约会,他们更喜欢跨种族约会,而不是任何单一种族群体。最后,混血儿对任何单一种族群体的跨种族约会都比单一种族之间的跨种族约会更开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Love is Not Colorblind: An Investigation of the Racial Hierarchy of Mate Preferences
Not my type is the usual invocation when rejecting potential lovers who don’t align with the racial hierarchy of mating preferences. The largely unchallenged norm of interracial intimacy aversion, particularly how the desire for some racial groups and rejection of others reinforces existing racial inequities, is inconsistent with the blanket notion of greater interracial acceptance. We contend that this acceptance is unequally divided along the same racial hierarchy that exists in the broader public sphere. Our investigation assessed the openness of monoracial and biracial individuals to form interracial romantic relationships. In addition, we partially replicated an interracial mate preference known as the Multiracial Dividend Effect: a pattern whereby monoracial individuals prefer to date multiracial individuals as these interracial relationships may be less likely to carry the perceived disadvantages of interracially dating someone from another monoracial group. Most monoracial groups equally preferred same-race lovers and interracially dating biracials, and they preferred interracially dating someone biracial over any monoracial group. Lastly, biracials were more open to interracially dating any monoracial group than monoracials were to interracially dating each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of the Profitability and Stability of Euro Area Banks During the Ice Age of Interest Rates Navigating Investment Waters: Uncovering the Impact of Financial Factors on Business Behavior in Small Economies The Nuanced Footprints of Covid-19 Predicament on Labour Market Integration of Migrants in Finland Reviewer Acknowledgements for Review of European Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4 Public Debt and Economic Growth after Covid-19 in Europe: Challenges and Policy Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1