Poorni M. Manohar, Kyle Bastys, M. Tratt, J. Gralow, K. Eaton
{"title":"骨调节剂的使用:在nci指定的癌症中心对转移性癌症和骨累及患者的分析","authors":"Poorni M. Manohar, Kyle Bastys, M. Tratt, J. Gralow, K. Eaton","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2023.03.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assessed bone-modifying agent (BMA) utilization and cost in patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center. We performed a retrospective review of BMA (zoledronic acid [ZA] or denosumab [DB]) utilization for fiscal years 2015 to 2020 (N = 1,421 patients; 14,545 administrations); a 60-day cutoff defined treatment interval (Q1 vs Q3). Wholesale acquisition and administration costs were estimated from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services–allowed charges. We calculated total costs and projected potential savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration. There were 8,247 ZA administrations (1,003 patients) and 6,308 DB administrations (536 patients), and an increase in the proportion of Q3 ZA administrations in patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Total costs on BMA utilization were estimated as $14.3 million, 90% attributable to DB. The projected savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration among all tumor types was $1.0 million. Awareness of BMA prescribing patterns provides the opportunity to create institutional pathways, align practice with best available evidence, and realize substantial savings.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"2008 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone-Modifying Agent Utilization: An Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Cancer and Bone Involvement at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center\",\"authors\":\"Poorni M. Manohar, Kyle Bastys, M. Tratt, J. Gralow, K. Eaton\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jcp.2023.03.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We assessed bone-modifying agent (BMA) utilization and cost in patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center. We performed a retrospective review of BMA (zoledronic acid [ZA] or denosumab [DB]) utilization for fiscal years 2015 to 2020 (N = 1,421 patients; 14,545 administrations); a 60-day cutoff defined treatment interval (Q1 vs Q3). Wholesale acquisition and administration costs were estimated from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services–allowed charges. We calculated total costs and projected potential savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration. There were 8,247 ZA administrations (1,003 patients) and 6,308 DB administrations (536 patients), and an increase in the proportion of Q3 ZA administrations in patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Total costs on BMA utilization were estimated as $14.3 million, 90% attributable to DB. The projected savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration among all tumor types was $1.0 million. Awareness of BMA prescribing patterns provides the opportunity to create institutional pathways, align practice with best available evidence, and realize substantial savings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"volume\":\"2008 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.03.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.03.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们在美国国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心评估了骨修饰剂(BMA)在转移性癌症和骨骼受损伤患者中的使用和成本。我们对2015 - 2020财年BMA(唑来膦酸[ZA]或地诺单抗[DB])的使用情况进行了回顾性分析(N = 1421例患者;14545年政府);60天的治疗间隔(Q1 vs Q3)。批发采购和管理成本是根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心允许的收费估算的。我们计算了从第一季度到第三季度ZA管理转换的总成本和预计的潜在节省。有8247次ZA给药(1003例患者)和6308次DB给药(536例患者),Q3次ZA给药在乳腺癌或多发性骨髓瘤患者中的比例增加。BMA利用的总成本估计为1430万美元,其中90%归因于DB。预计在所有肿瘤类型中,从第一季度到第三季度的ZA治疗将节省100万美元。对BMA处方模式的认识提供了创建机构途径的机会,使实践与最佳可用证据保持一致,并实现大量节省。
Bone-Modifying Agent Utilization: An Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Cancer and Bone Involvement at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center
We assessed bone-modifying agent (BMA) utilization and cost in patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center. We performed a retrospective review of BMA (zoledronic acid [ZA] or denosumab [DB]) utilization for fiscal years 2015 to 2020 (N = 1,421 patients; 14,545 administrations); a 60-day cutoff defined treatment interval (Q1 vs Q3). Wholesale acquisition and administration costs were estimated from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services–allowed charges. We calculated total costs and projected potential savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration. There were 8,247 ZA administrations (1,003 patients) and 6,308 DB administrations (536 patients), and an increase in the proportion of Q3 ZA administrations in patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Total costs on BMA utilization were estimated as $14.3 million, 90% attributable to DB. The projected savings for switching from Q1 to Q3 ZA administration among all tumor types was $1.0 million. Awareness of BMA prescribing patterns provides the opportunity to create institutional pathways, align practice with best available evidence, and realize substantial savings.