尼泊尔Rupandehi社区和宗教森林树种多样性和碳储量

Anu Paudyal, M. Chettri, Bishal Subedi, R. Khanal
{"title":"尼泊尔Rupandehi社区和宗教森林树种多样性和碳储量","authors":"Anu Paudyal, M. Chettri, Bishal Subedi, R. Khanal","doi":"10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest is one of the most important natural resources of the ecosystem which contributes in biodiversity conservation as well as plays a significant role in maintaining the earth’s climate by sequestrating atmospheric carbon. Tropical forests are rich in biodiversity and store large amounts of carbon. The studied Bolbum Community Forest (BCF) and Brahmakumari Global Religious Forest (BGRF) lie in tropical region between the altitudes 120 and 300 m asl in Rupandehi District of Nepal. The main objective of this research was to assess and compare tree diversities and carbon stocks in two different management regimes, namely, community forest and religious forest. Stratified random sampling technique was used for data collection. The allometric equation biomass-diameter regression (Model II) was used for estimation of carbon stock of tree species while Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices were used to measure tree species diversity. The results showed that the carbon stock value was 27.15 t.ha-1 in BCF and 40.94 t.ha-1 in BGRF. The community forest had lower value of tree carbon stock than that of the religious forest. However, tree diversity was higher in BCF (25) than in BGRF (20). Shorea robusta was found to be the single dominant species in BGRF with higher basal area (102.24 m².ha-1) and contributed 56% of the carbon stock. The contribution of carbon stock of two co-dominant tree species in BCF were 32% for Shorea robusta and 26% for Terminalia anogeissiana. There was significant (p=0.05) positive relationship of carbon stock with basal area and DBH in both forest types.","PeriodicalId":16849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Resources and Environment","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tree Species Diversity and Carbon Stock in Community and Religious Forests of Rupandehi, Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Anu Paudyal, M. Chettri, Bishal Subedi, R. Khanal\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forest is one of the most important natural resources of the ecosystem which contributes in biodiversity conservation as well as plays a significant role in maintaining the earth’s climate by sequestrating atmospheric carbon. Tropical forests are rich in biodiversity and store large amounts of carbon. The studied Bolbum Community Forest (BCF) and Brahmakumari Global Religious Forest (BGRF) lie in tropical region between the altitudes 120 and 300 m asl in Rupandehi District of Nepal. The main objective of this research was to assess and compare tree diversities and carbon stocks in two different management regimes, namely, community forest and religious forest. Stratified random sampling technique was used for data collection. The allometric equation biomass-diameter regression (Model II) was used for estimation of carbon stock of tree species while Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices were used to measure tree species diversity. The results showed that the carbon stock value was 27.15 t.ha-1 in BCF and 40.94 t.ha-1 in BGRF. The community forest had lower value of tree carbon stock than that of the religious forest. However, tree diversity was higher in BCF (25) than in BGRF (20). Shorea robusta was found to be the single dominant species in BGRF with higher basal area (102.24 m².ha-1) and contributed 56% of the carbon stock. The contribution of carbon stock of two co-dominant tree species in BCF were 32% for Shorea robusta and 26% for Terminalia anogeissiana. There was significant (p=0.05) positive relationship of carbon stock with basal area and DBH in both forest types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Resources and Environment\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Resources and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Resources and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林是生态系统中最重要的自然资源之一,具有保护生物多样性的作用,并通过固碳在维持地球气候方面发挥着重要作用。热带森林具有丰富的生物多样性,并储存了大量的碳。研究的Bolbum群落森林(BCF)和Brahmakumari全球宗教森林(BGRF)位于尼泊尔鲁潘德希地区海拔120 - 300米之间的热带地区。本研究的主要目的是评估和比较两种不同管理制度下的树木多样性和碳储量,即社区森林和宗教森林。数据采集采用分层随机抽样技术。采用异速生长方程生物量-直径回归(模型II)估算树种碳储量,采用Simpson指数和Shannon-Wiener指数衡量树种多样性。结果表明:北风区和北风区的碳储量分别为27.15 t.ha-1和40.94 t.ha-1;群落林的树木碳储量低于宗教林。然而,BCF(25)的树木多样性高于BGRF(20)。结果表明,绿僵树(Shorea robusta)是BGRF中唯一的优势种,其基面积(102.24 m².ha-1)较高,贡献了56%的碳储量。两种共同优势树种对森林碳储量的贡献分别为:粗壮杉木32%和黄松杉木26%。两种林型碳储量与基材面积、胸径均呈显著正相关(p=0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tree Species Diversity and Carbon Stock in Community and Religious Forests of Rupandehi, Nepal
Forest is one of the most important natural resources of the ecosystem which contributes in biodiversity conservation as well as plays a significant role in maintaining the earth’s climate by sequestrating atmospheric carbon. Tropical forests are rich in biodiversity and store large amounts of carbon. The studied Bolbum Community Forest (BCF) and Brahmakumari Global Religious Forest (BGRF) lie in tropical region between the altitudes 120 and 300 m asl in Rupandehi District of Nepal. The main objective of this research was to assess and compare tree diversities and carbon stocks in two different management regimes, namely, community forest and religious forest. Stratified random sampling technique was used for data collection. The allometric equation biomass-diameter regression (Model II) was used for estimation of carbon stock of tree species while Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices were used to measure tree species diversity. The results showed that the carbon stock value was 27.15 t.ha-1 in BCF and 40.94 t.ha-1 in BGRF. The community forest had lower value of tree carbon stock than that of the religious forest. However, tree diversity was higher in BCF (25) than in BGRF (20). Shorea robusta was found to be the single dominant species in BGRF with higher basal area (102.24 m².ha-1) and contributed 56% of the carbon stock. The contribution of carbon stock of two co-dominant tree species in BCF were 32% for Shorea robusta and 26% for Terminalia anogeissiana. There was significant (p=0.05) positive relationship of carbon stock with basal area and DBH in both forest types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Resources and Environment
Journal of Plant Resources and Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Handbook of the Flowering Plants of Nepal Volume 3 New Record of Fungi Cerotelium malvicola (Speg.) Dietel (Uredinales) Parasitic on Hibiscus Species from Nepal Phytochemical Studies and Toxicity Evaluation of Selected Medicinal Plants from Sarlahi District, Nepal A Handbook of Bryophytes of Nepal Volume 1 Species Composition of Bryophytes at Different Altitudinal Habitats in Langtang National Park, Bagmati Province, Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1