2021年四年一次全国体育竞赛体育从业者营养知识评价研究

M. Ali, G. Anggita, Said Junaidi, S. Sugiarto, S. Mukarromah, D. Kurniawati, E. Noer, Zainudin Amali, Donny Wira Yudha Kusuma, Leo Nacion Santillana, A. Wicaksono, A. Candra
{"title":"2021年四年一次全国体育竞赛体育从业者营养知识评价研究","authors":"M. Ali, G. Anggita, Said Junaidi, S. Sugiarto, S. Mukarromah, D. Kurniawati, E. Noer, Zainudin Amali, Donny Wira Yudha Kusuma, Leo Nacion Santillana, A. Wicaksono, A. Candra","doi":"10.14710/jgi.10.2.200-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nutritional program is another influencing factor of athletic performance after the physical training program, and psychological training program. However, Indonesian sports practitioners somehow still neglect the important role of sports nutrition to achieve the best athletic performance.Objectives: To examine the level of basic nutritional and sports nutritional knowledge among the sport’s practitioners who participated in the quadrennial national sports competition 2021.Materials and Methods: This evaluation study has conducted with a descriptive quantitative approach. Thirty-eight sports practitioners (24 males and 14 females), were represented from five provinces such as Central Java, Western Java, Eastern Java, Southern Sumatera, and Bali. Their status during the sports events are athletes, referees, officials, coaches, and judges. The incidental technique sampling was used to attract the respondents. Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaires (NKQ) developed by Rosi et al, was used in this study. Data was analyzed with the frequencies distribution technique, and displayed using the percentage.Results: More than half of the total respondents (81%) have good, very good, and excellent knowledge in general nutrition (21%, 34%, 26%) respectively. Similarly, it is also happened in the evaluation of their knowledge for basic nutrition good (5%), very good (29%), excellent (40%), as well as in their knowledge levels for sports nutrition, good 18% and excellent 53%. However, based on the evaluation of their sports nutritional knowledge, we found that there are 8% (n=3) of the respondent were failed as the score <50 points.Conclusion: Overall, the nutritional knowledge for general, basic and sports in sports practitioners evaluated good. However, the sports nutritional knowledge is not well understood evenly by them. At last, this study can be used as a reference to make a better decision on how sports nutrition must be promoted to maximize the athletic performance.","PeriodicalId":32498,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evaluation Study of Nutritional Knowledge from Sports Practitioners in The Quadrennial National Sports Competition 2021\",\"authors\":\"M. Ali, G. Anggita, Said Junaidi, S. Sugiarto, S. Mukarromah, D. Kurniawati, E. Noer, Zainudin Amali, Donny Wira Yudha Kusuma, Leo Nacion Santillana, A. Wicaksono, A. Candra\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/jgi.10.2.200-205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nutritional program is another influencing factor of athletic performance after the physical training program, and psychological training program. However, Indonesian sports practitioners somehow still neglect the important role of sports nutrition to achieve the best athletic performance.Objectives: To examine the level of basic nutritional and sports nutritional knowledge among the sport’s practitioners who participated in the quadrennial national sports competition 2021.Materials and Methods: This evaluation study has conducted with a descriptive quantitative approach. Thirty-eight sports practitioners (24 males and 14 females), were represented from five provinces such as Central Java, Western Java, Eastern Java, Southern Sumatera, and Bali. Their status during the sports events are athletes, referees, officials, coaches, and judges. The incidental technique sampling was used to attract the respondents. Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaires (NKQ) developed by Rosi et al, was used in this study. Data was analyzed with the frequencies distribution technique, and displayed using the percentage.Results: More than half of the total respondents (81%) have good, very good, and excellent knowledge in general nutrition (21%, 34%, 26%) respectively. Similarly, it is also happened in the evaluation of their knowledge for basic nutrition good (5%), very good (29%), excellent (40%), as well as in their knowledge levels for sports nutrition, good 18% and excellent 53%. However, based on the evaluation of their sports nutritional knowledge, we found that there are 8% (n=3) of the respondent were failed as the score <50 points.Conclusion: Overall, the nutritional knowledge for general, basic and sports in sports practitioners evaluated good. However, the sports nutritional knowledge is not well understood evenly by them. At last, this study can be used as a reference to make a better decision on how sports nutrition must be promoted to maximize the athletic performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/jgi.10.2.200-205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jgi.10.2.200-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:营养计划是继体能训练计划、心理训练计划之后影响运动员运动成绩的又一因素。然而,印度尼西亚的体育从业者仍然不知怎的忽视了运动营养对获得最佳运动成绩的重要作用。目的:了解参加四年一次的2021全国体育竞赛的体育从业人员的基本营养和运动营养知识水平。材料与方法:本评价研究采用描述性定量方法进行。38名体育从业人员(24名男性和14名女性)来自中爪哇、西爪哇、东爪哇、南苏门答腊和巴厘岛等5个省。他们在体育赛事中的身份是运动员、裁判员、官员、教练员和裁判员。采用偶然抽样技术吸引调查对象。本研究采用Rosi等人开发的营养知识问卷(NKQ)。使用频率分布技术分析数据,并使用百分比显示数据。结果:半数以上(81%)的被调查者对一般营养知识有良好、很好、优秀的认识,分别为21%、34%、26%。同样,在对基本营养知识(5%)、非常好(29%)、优秀(40%)的评价中,以及对运动营养知识水平(良好18%、优秀53%)的评价中,也出现了同样的情况。然而,通过对他们的运动营养知识的评估,我们发现有8% (n=3)的受访者因得分<50分而不及格。结论:总体而言,体育从业人员对普通、基础和运动营养知识的评价较好。然而,他们对运动营养知识的了解并不均匀。最后,本研究可以为更好地决策如何促进运动营养以最大限度地提高运动成绩提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Evaluation Study of Nutritional Knowledge from Sports Practitioners in The Quadrennial National Sports Competition 2021
Background: Nutritional program is another influencing factor of athletic performance after the physical training program, and psychological training program. However, Indonesian sports practitioners somehow still neglect the important role of sports nutrition to achieve the best athletic performance.Objectives: To examine the level of basic nutritional and sports nutritional knowledge among the sport’s practitioners who participated in the quadrennial national sports competition 2021.Materials and Methods: This evaluation study has conducted with a descriptive quantitative approach. Thirty-eight sports practitioners (24 males and 14 females), were represented from five provinces such as Central Java, Western Java, Eastern Java, Southern Sumatera, and Bali. Their status during the sports events are athletes, referees, officials, coaches, and judges. The incidental technique sampling was used to attract the respondents. Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaires (NKQ) developed by Rosi et al, was used in this study. Data was analyzed with the frequencies distribution technique, and displayed using the percentage.Results: More than half of the total respondents (81%) have good, very good, and excellent knowledge in general nutrition (21%, 34%, 26%) respectively. Similarly, it is also happened in the evaluation of their knowledge for basic nutrition good (5%), very good (29%), excellent (40%), as well as in their knowledge levels for sports nutrition, good 18% and excellent 53%. However, based on the evaluation of their sports nutritional knowledge, we found that there are 8% (n=3) of the respondent were failed as the score <50 points.Conclusion: Overall, the nutritional knowledge for general, basic and sports in sports practitioners evaluated good. However, the sports nutritional knowledge is not well understood evenly by them. At last, this study can be used as a reference to make a better decision on how sports nutrition must be promoted to maximize the athletic performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
SMALL DENSE LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL AND CENTRAL OBESITY ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AMONG INDONESIAN ADULTS MALNUTRITION AT HOSPITAL ADMISSION AND ITS ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN INTERNAL MEDICINE INPATIENTS COMPARISON BETWEEN METABOLIC PARAMETERS, FOOD INTAKE, AND GUT MICROBIOTA IN TYPE 2 DIABETES AND NON-DIABETIC INDONESIAN WOMEN DETERMINING THE NUTRIENTS CHANGES AFTER UNDERGOING NUTRITIONAL COUNSELING AND COOKING ASSISTANCE AMONG T2DM OUTPATIENTS IN MALANG CITY, INDONESIA STUDY OF VITAMIN D3-FORTIFIED GOAT KEFIR ON PLASMA FIBRINOGEN LEVELS OF DIABETIC RATTUS NORVEGICUS RATS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1