{"title":"赫尔墨斯法官与理性的标志:为什么三段论的法律适用是不够的","authors":"María Victoria Feito Torrez","doi":"10.24215/18522971E079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.","PeriodicalId":40988,"journal":{"name":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El juez Hermes y el logos de lo razonable: Por qué la aplicación silogística del Derecho no es suficiente\",\"authors\":\"María Victoria Feito Torrez\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/18522971E079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971E079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971E079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
El juez Hermes y el logos de lo razonable: Por qué la aplicación silogística del Derecho no es suficiente
The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.