赫尔墨斯法官与理性的标志:为什么三段论的法律适用是不够的

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Derecho y Ciencias Sociales Pub Date : 2020-10-05 DOI:10.24215/18522971E079
María Victoria Feito Torrez
{"title":"赫尔墨斯法官与理性的标志:为什么三段论的法律适用是不够的","authors":"María Victoria Feito Torrez","doi":"10.24215/18522971E079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.","PeriodicalId":40988,"journal":{"name":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El juez Hermes y el logos de lo razonable: Por qué la aplicación silogística del Derecho no es suficiente\",\"authors\":\"María Victoria Feito Torrez\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/18522971E079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971E079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971E079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律实证主义对纽伦堡审判后纳粹领导人案件的不满意回答,导致法律解释理论重新界定其边界。这篇文章回顾了两位杰出的法学家的贡献:Luis Recasens Siches和Francois Ost,他们的作品为新的解释学派做出了贡献,质疑法律的严格形式应用,并为合理的应用开辟了一条道路,更符合日益复杂的法律秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El juez Hermes y el logos de lo razonable: Por qué la aplicación silogística del Derecho no es suficiente
The unsatisfactory answer given by Legal Positivisms the case of the nazi leaders after the Nuremberg trials led the Theory of Legal Interpretation to redefine its borders. This work reviews the contributions of two prominent jurists: Luis Recasens Siches and Francois Ost, whose works contributed to the new interpretation schools questioning the strictly formal application of the Law and making a way for a reasonable application, more in accordance with the growing complexity of the legal order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
transformaciones en la legislación laboral durante el ciclo kirchnerista en Argentina: gobierno, CGT y empresarios en el ámbito de los debates parlamentarios y legislativos (2003-2015) Negociar los derechos de las infancias Derecho territorial indígena y brecha de implementación en el Neuquén del siglo XXI caso Dobbs y el futuro de la autodeterminación personal en Estados Unidos Conversaciones entre la práctica psicológica y jurídica de la Adopción: desafíos en la escucha e intervención
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1