COVID-19大流行与老年人:紧急植入心脏起搏器是否已经落下帷幕?

M. Marini, F. Zilio, Marta Martin, M. Strazzanti, S. Quintarelli, F. Guarracini, A. Coser, D. Giacopelli, R. Bonmassari
{"title":"COVID-19大流行与老年人:紧急植入心脏起搏器是否已经落下帷幕?","authors":"M. Marini, F. Zilio, Marta Martin, M. Strazzanti, S. Quintarelli, F. Guarracini, A. Coser, D. Giacopelli, R. Bonmassari","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05451-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPermanent cardiac pacing is the therapy of choice for treating severe and/or symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. During the COVID-19 outbreak, it has been reported a decrease in the incidence of acute coronary syndrome, but few data are available about pacemaker implantation rates. This study aimed to analyse patients referred to our centre with permanent cardiac pacing indication during the COVID-19 outbreak.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe compared the number, the characteristics and the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent pacemaker implantation between March and April 2019 (Group I) with those performed in the corresponding 2020 period (Group II).\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 27 patients (Group I) were implanted in March-April 2019 and 34 patients (Group II) in the corresponding 2020 period. In both groups, about half of the patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker. No significant differences in baseline patients' characteristics were observed. The most frequent indication was advanced atrio-ventricular block with a prevalence of 78% and 62% in Group I and II, respectively. The rate of procedural complications, the in-hospital and 1-month mortality were also similar between the two groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn our regional referral center, we observed a routine activity in terms of urgent pacemaker implantations for the treatment of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia during the COVID-19 outbreak.","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 pandemic and elderly: is the curtain dropped for urgent pacemaker implantations?\",\"authors\":\"M. Marini, F. Zilio, Marta Martin, M. Strazzanti, S. Quintarelli, F. Guarracini, A. Coser, D. Giacopelli, R. Bonmassari\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05451-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPermanent cardiac pacing is the therapy of choice for treating severe and/or symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. During the COVID-19 outbreak, it has been reported a decrease in the incidence of acute coronary syndrome, but few data are available about pacemaker implantation rates. This study aimed to analyse patients referred to our centre with permanent cardiac pacing indication during the COVID-19 outbreak.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe compared the number, the characteristics and the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent pacemaker implantation between March and April 2019 (Group I) with those performed in the corresponding 2020 period (Group II).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA total of 27 patients (Group I) were implanted in March-April 2019 and 34 patients (Group II) in the corresponding 2020 period. In both groups, about half of the patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker. No significant differences in baseline patients' characteristics were observed. The most frequent indication was advanced atrio-ventricular block with a prevalence of 78% and 62% in Group I and II, respectively. The rate of procedural complications, the in-hospital and 1-month mortality were also similar between the two groups.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nIn our regional referral center, we observed a routine activity in terms of urgent pacemaker implantations for the treatment of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia during the COVID-19 outbreak.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05451-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05451-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:永久性心脏起搏是治疗严重和/或症状性慢性心律失常的首选疗法。据报道,在2019冠状病毒病暴发期间,急性冠状动脉综合征的发病率有所下降,但关于起搏器植入率的数据很少。本研究旨在分析2019冠状病毒病暴发期间转诊至本中心的永久性心脏起搏指征患者。方法比较2019年3月至4月(I组)与2020年同期(II组)实施紧急起搏器植入术的患者数量、特点及结果。结果2019年3月至4月(I组)共植入术27例,2020年同期(II组)共植入术34例。在两组中,大约一半的患者接受了双室起搏器。基线患者特征无显著差异。最常见的适应症是晚期房室传导阻滞,I组和II组的患病率分别为78%和62%。两组手术并发症发生率、住院死亡率和1个月死亡率相似。结论在我们的区域转诊中心,我们观察到在COVID-19暴发期间,紧急植入起搏器治疗症状性慢性心律失常的常规活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 pandemic and elderly: is the curtain dropped for urgent pacemaker implantations?
BACKGROUND Permanent cardiac pacing is the therapy of choice for treating severe and/or symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. During the COVID-19 outbreak, it has been reported a decrease in the incidence of acute coronary syndrome, but few data are available about pacemaker implantation rates. This study aimed to analyse patients referred to our centre with permanent cardiac pacing indication during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS We compared the number, the characteristics and the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent pacemaker implantation between March and April 2019 (Group I) with those performed in the corresponding 2020 period (Group II). RESULTS A total of 27 patients (Group I) were implanted in March-April 2019 and 34 patients (Group II) in the corresponding 2020 period. In both groups, about half of the patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker. No significant differences in baseline patients' characteristics were observed. The most frequent indication was advanced atrio-ventricular block with a prevalence of 78% and 62% in Group I and II, respectively. The rate of procedural complications, the in-hospital and 1-month mortality were also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In our regional referral center, we observed a routine activity in terms of urgent pacemaker implantations for the treatment of symptomatic bradyarrhythmia during the COVID-19 outbreak.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Systolic, mean and pulse pressure values in patients with acute coronary syndrome: worth keeping an eye on. Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided revascularization of non-culprit lesion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease: design and rationale of the WAVE registry. Cannabis, health and prevention. The role of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute coronary syndrome patients: a critical risk factor for lipid plaque burden? Left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: a call for an echocardiography-based classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1