二甲双胍联合新辅助化疗对非糖尿病乳腺癌患者病理反应的疗效-一项随机对照试验

K. Dharanipragada, N. Ghimire, N. Ghimire, Shanmugam Dasarathan, B. Zachariah, P. Toi, Sunitha Vc, S. Selvarajan
{"title":"二甲双胍联合新辅助化疗对非糖尿病乳腺癌患者病理反应的疗效-一项随机对照试验","authors":"K. Dharanipragada, N. Ghimire, N. Ghimire, Shanmugam Dasarathan, B. Zachariah, P. Toi, Sunitha Vc, S. Selvarajan","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.06.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In India breast cancer forms the commonest malignancy after cervical cancer in females and is detected in 20 per 1,00,000 women. Metformin acts as oral hypoglycemia drug and anti-tumor drug. Mechanism of action of metformin is to inhibit cellular proliferation as well as to increases pathological Complete Response in breast cancer patients when used in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\nMethods: This randomized control trial study was conducted on 54 patients to assess the effect of adding metformin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic response in Breast Cancer patients as well as to establish safety and tolerance of metformin as a neoadjuvant drug in Breast cancer and to measure the effect of metformin on sex hormones, tumor and insulin resistance dated from November 2016 to June 2018. Study group received metformin along with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and Control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only. In every visit, side effects of metformin were assessed like nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, dizziness. Pre NACT-BMI and Post NACT- BMI were calculated and differences were assessed. Any post-operative complication was looked for post-surgery. Data was analysed by SPSS version 19.\nResults: Our study showed that DHEAS level decreased by 5.65 in study group while the fall in DHEAS in non-metformin arm was 2.1. 7.1% of participants in metformin group showed complete response, 78.6% participants showed partial response and 14.3% had progressive disease. In non-metformin group, complete, partial response and progressive disease were seen in 40.0%, 60.0% and 0.0% respectively. Patient in control group had higher complete response. However, the difference in pathologic complete response between metformin and non-metformin group has no statistical significance (p= 0.057).\nConclusion: Our study supports the view that patient without insulin resistance treated with NACT alone has higher pathologic complete response than the patient treated with NACT with metformin. However, sample size of present study is small to support the results.\n","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Combining Metformin with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Response in Non-diabetic Patients with Carcinoma Breast- A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"K. Dharanipragada, N. Ghimire, N. Ghimire, Shanmugam Dasarathan, B. Zachariah, P. Toi, Sunitha Vc, S. Selvarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.cor.2021.06.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In India breast cancer forms the commonest malignancy after cervical cancer in females and is detected in 20 per 1,00,000 women. Metformin acts as oral hypoglycemia drug and anti-tumor drug. Mechanism of action of metformin is to inhibit cellular proliferation as well as to increases pathological Complete Response in breast cancer patients when used in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\\nMethods: This randomized control trial study was conducted on 54 patients to assess the effect of adding metformin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic response in Breast Cancer patients as well as to establish safety and tolerance of metformin as a neoadjuvant drug in Breast cancer and to measure the effect of metformin on sex hormones, tumor and insulin resistance dated from November 2016 to June 2018. Study group received metformin along with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and Control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only. In every visit, side effects of metformin were assessed like nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, dizziness. Pre NACT-BMI and Post NACT- BMI were calculated and differences were assessed. Any post-operative complication was looked for post-surgery. Data was analysed by SPSS version 19.\\nResults: Our study showed that DHEAS level decreased by 5.65 in study group while the fall in DHEAS in non-metformin arm was 2.1. 7.1% of participants in metformin group showed complete response, 78.6% participants showed partial response and 14.3% had progressive disease. In non-metformin group, complete, partial response and progressive disease were seen in 40.0%, 60.0% and 0.0% respectively. Patient in control group had higher complete response. However, the difference in pathologic complete response between metformin and non-metformin group has no statistical significance (p= 0.057).\\nConclusion: Our study supports the view that patient without insulin resistance treated with NACT alone has higher pathologic complete response than the patient treated with NACT with metformin. However, sample size of present study is small to support the results.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.06.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.06.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度,乳腺癌是女性中仅次于宫颈癌的最常见的恶性肿瘤,每10万名妇女中有20人被发现。二甲双胍作为口服降糖药和抗肿瘤药。二甲双胍的作用机制是在乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的基础上抑制细胞增殖,增加病理完全缓解。方法:本随机对照试验研究于2016年11月至2018年6月对54例乳腺癌患者进行新辅助化疗,评估添加二甲双胍对乳腺癌患者病理反应的影响,确定二甲双胍作为乳腺癌新辅助药物的安全性和耐受性,并测量二甲双胍对性激素、肿瘤和胰岛素抵抗的影响。研究组在新辅助化疗的同时给予二甲双胍治疗,对照组只给予新辅助化疗。在每次访问中,评估二甲双胍的副作用,如恶心,呕吐,腹部不适,头晕。计算NACT-BMI前和NACT-BMI后的差异。术后观察有无术后并发症。数据采用SPSS 19进行分析。结果:我们的研究显示,研究组DHEAS水平下降5.65,而非二甲双胍组DHEAS下降2.1。二甲双胍组有7.1%的患者完全缓解,78.6%的患者部分缓解,14.3%的患者病情进展。非二甲双胍组完全缓解、部分缓解和进展性疾病发生率分别为40.0%、60.0%和0.0%。对照组患者完全缓解率较高。而二甲双胍组与非二甲双胍组病理完全缓解差异无统计学意义(p= 0.057)。结论:本研究支持无胰岛素抵抗患者单用NACT治疗比单用NACT联合二甲双胍治疗有更高的病理完全缓解的观点。然而,本研究的样本量较小,不足以支持该结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Combining Metformin with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Response in Non-diabetic Patients with Carcinoma Breast- A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: In India breast cancer forms the commonest malignancy after cervical cancer in females and is detected in 20 per 1,00,000 women. Metformin acts as oral hypoglycemia drug and anti-tumor drug. Mechanism of action of metformin is to inhibit cellular proliferation as well as to increases pathological Complete Response in breast cancer patients when used in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: This randomized control trial study was conducted on 54 patients to assess the effect of adding metformin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic response in Breast Cancer patients as well as to establish safety and tolerance of metformin as a neoadjuvant drug in Breast cancer and to measure the effect of metformin on sex hormones, tumor and insulin resistance dated from November 2016 to June 2018. Study group received metformin along with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and Control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only. In every visit, side effects of metformin were assessed like nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, dizziness. Pre NACT-BMI and Post NACT- BMI were calculated and differences were assessed. Any post-operative complication was looked for post-surgery. Data was analysed by SPSS version 19. Results: Our study showed that DHEAS level decreased by 5.65 in study group while the fall in DHEAS in non-metformin arm was 2.1. 7.1% of participants in metformin group showed complete response, 78.6% participants showed partial response and 14.3% had progressive disease. In non-metformin group, complete, partial response and progressive disease were seen in 40.0%, 60.0% and 0.0% respectively. Patient in control group had higher complete response. However, the difference in pathologic complete response between metformin and non-metformin group has no statistical significance (p= 0.057). Conclusion: Our study supports the view that patient without insulin resistance treated with NACT alone has higher pathologic complete response than the patient treated with NACT with metformin. However, sample size of present study is small to support the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Thymic Carcinoma: Case Report and Discussion on Problems of Treatment What is the Obstetric Outcome with a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia? Effects of DSPP and MMP20 Silencing on Key Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Multifaceted Networking of The Orphan Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor Β in Breast Cancer Progression Current CT and MRI Applications in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1