性别差异与批判行为(尼采与伊里加雷)

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1387
Penelope Deutscher
{"title":"性别差异与批判行为(尼采与伊里加雷)","authors":"Penelope Deutscher","doi":"10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Nietzsche, a phenomenon, a belief, a mode of knowledge, or of subjectivity, confronts us with the possibility of creating, rather than presupposing, the criteria for its evaluation. In his Untimely Meditations, he widened the parameters of criticizability in just this way, proposing that history might be evaluated from the criterion of whether it is good or bad for life. Nietzsche provokes us to ask what the right question is to bring to history. Stepping back to formulate a response might allow us to appreciate the difference between interrogating the accuracy of historical accounts and assessing their effects.","PeriodicalId":53829,"journal":{"name":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual difference and the conduct of critique (Nietzsche and Irigaray)\",\"authors\":\"Penelope Deutscher\",\"doi\":\"10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For Nietzsche, a phenomenon, a belief, a mode of knowledge, or of subjectivity, confronts us with the possibility of creating, rather than presupposing, the criteria for its evaluation. In his Untimely Meditations, he widened the parameters of criticizability in just this way, proposing that history might be evaluated from the criterion of whether it is good or bad for life. Nietzsche provokes us to ask what the right question is to bring to history. Stepping back to formulate a response might allow us to appreciate the difference between interrogating the accuracy of historical accounts and assessing their effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对尼采来说,一种现象,一种信仰,一种知识模式,或一种主观性,使我们面临着创造的可能性,而不是预设的,评估标准。在他的《不合时宜的沉思》中,他以这种方式扩大了批评的范围,提出可以从对生活是好是坏的标准来评估历史。尼采激发我们问,什么是历史的正确问题。退后一步,制定一个回应可能会让我们认识到质疑历史记载的准确性和评估其影响之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual difference and the conduct of critique (Nietzsche and Irigaray)
For Nietzsche, a phenomenon, a belief, a mode of knowledge, or of subjectivity, confronts us with the possibility of creating, rather than presupposing, the criteria for its evaluation. In his Untimely Meditations, he widened the parameters of criticizability in just this way, proposing that history might be evaluated from the criterion of whether it is good or bad for life. Nietzsche provokes us to ask what the right question is to bring to history. Stepping back to formulate a response might allow us to appreciate the difference between interrogating the accuracy of historical accounts and assessing their effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sartre y Genet: el mundo in/per-vertido Instituciones defectivas: un protocolo para la república Muñoz, Jacobo (2022). Crítica i veritat: Assaigs, ressenyes, converses (1980-2015) Vermeren, Patrice (2021). Le philosophe communeux: Napoléon La Cécilia, néokantien, philologue et général de la Commune de Paris Pineda Canabal, Aníbal (2021). Le concept de non-contemporanéité dans la philosophie d’Ernst Bloch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1