南方共同市场公民身份:从经济一体化到政治一体化的失败转型?

Fernando Arlettaz
{"title":"南方共同市场公民身份:从经济一体化到政治一体化的失败转型?","authors":"Fernando Arlettaz","doi":"10.54648/leie2021030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of MERCOSUR citizenship, based on the freedom of movement and the equality of civil and social rights, intended a transition from a strictly economic regional integration to a political one. However, the weaknesses of the regional process (such as the slowness of the internalization of regional regulations, the heterogeneities in that internalization and the concurrence of other regional processes) hamper the consolidation of a regional regime of citizenship, leading to inequalities incompatible with the very concept of citizenship.\nMERCOSUR, citizenship, economic integration, political integration, freedom of movement, equality, UNASUR","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MERCOSUR Citizenship: Failed Transition from Economic to Political Integration?\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Arlettaz\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2021030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of MERCOSUR citizenship, based on the freedom of movement and the equality of civil and social rights, intended a transition from a strictly economic regional integration to a political one. However, the weaknesses of the regional process (such as the slowness of the internalization of regional regulations, the heterogeneities in that internalization and the concurrence of other regional processes) hamper the consolidation of a regional regime of citizenship, leading to inequalities incompatible with the very concept of citizenship.\\nMERCOSUR, citizenship, economic integration, political integration, freedom of movement, equality, UNASUR\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南方共同市场公民身份的概念以行动自由和平等的公民权利和社会权利为基础,旨在从严格的经济区域一体化过渡到政治一体化。但是,区域进程的弱点(例如区域条例内部化的缓慢、内部化的不一致以及其他区域进程的同时发生)阻碍了区域公民制度的巩固,导致了与公民概念本身不相容的不平等。南方共同市场,公民身份,经济一体化,政治一体化,行动自由,平等,UNASUR
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MERCOSUR Citizenship: Failed Transition from Economic to Political Integration?
The concept of MERCOSUR citizenship, based on the freedom of movement and the equality of civil and social rights, intended a transition from a strictly economic regional integration to a political one. However, the weaknesses of the regional process (such as the slowness of the internalization of regional regulations, the heterogeneities in that internalization and the concurrence of other regional processes) hamper the consolidation of a regional regime of citizenship, leading to inequalities incompatible with the very concept of citizenship. MERCOSUR, citizenship, economic integration, political integration, freedom of movement, equality, UNASUR
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1