最优所得税与工作选择

Robin Boadway, Zhen Song, J. Tremblay
{"title":"最优所得税与工作选择","authors":"Robin Boadway, Zhen Song, J. Tremblay","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies optimal income taxation when there are different types of jobs for workers of different skills. Each type of job has a given feasible range of incomes from which workers can choose by varying their labour supply. Workers are more productive than all others in the jobs that suit them best. The model combines features of the classic optimal income tax literature with labour variability along the intensive margin with those of the extensive-margin approach where workers make discrete job choices and/or participation decisions. Some specific results are as follows. First-best maximin levels of utility can be achieved in the second-best. Marginal tax rates below the top can often be negative or zero. When there are more than two skill-types of workers and jobs, incentive constraints are not necessarily binding on adjacent types as in the standard intensive-margin model. When participation decisions are allowed, the intensive margin and the extensive margin tend to have opposite effects on the level of participation taxes.","PeriodicalId":11754,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Income Taxation and Job Choice\",\"authors\":\"Robin Boadway, Zhen Song, J. Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sjoe.12199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies optimal income taxation when there are different types of jobs for workers of different skills. Each type of job has a given feasible range of incomes from which workers can choose by varying their labour supply. Workers are more productive than all others in the jobs that suit them best. The model combines features of the classic optimal income tax literature with labour variability along the intensive margin with those of the extensive-margin approach where workers make discrete job choices and/or participation decisions. Some specific results are as follows. First-best maximin levels of utility can be achieved in the second-best. Marginal tax rates below the top can often be negative or zero. When there are more than two skill-types of workers and jobs, incentive constraints are not necessarily binding on adjacent types as in the standard intensive-margin model. When participation decisions are allowed, the intensive margin and the extensive margin tend to have opposite effects on the level of participation taxes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了不同技能的劳动者有不同类型的工作时的最优所得税。每一种工作都有一个可行的收入范围,工人可以通过改变他们的劳动力供给来选择。在最适合他们的工作中,工人比其他人更有生产力。该模型结合了经典的最优所得税文献的特征,其中包括沿密集边际的劳动可变性,以及工人做出离散工作选择和/或参与决策的广泛边际方法的特征。具体结果如下:第一最佳效用最大化水平可以在第二最佳中实现。低于最高收入者的边际税率通常为负或为零。当工人和工作的技能类型超过两种时,激励约束不一定像标准集约边际模型那样对相邻类型具有约束力。当允许参与决策时,密集边际和广泛边际往往对参与税的水平产生相反的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal Income Taxation and Job Choice
This paper studies optimal income taxation when there are different types of jobs for workers of different skills. Each type of job has a given feasible range of incomes from which workers can choose by varying their labour supply. Workers are more productive than all others in the jobs that suit them best. The model combines features of the classic optimal income tax literature with labour variability along the intensive margin with those of the extensive-margin approach where workers make discrete job choices and/or participation decisions. Some specific results are as follows. First-best maximin levels of utility can be achieved in the second-best. Marginal tax rates below the top can often be negative or zero. When there are more than two skill-types of workers and jobs, incentive constraints are not necessarily binding on adjacent types as in the standard intensive-margin model. When participation decisions are allowed, the intensive margin and the extensive margin tend to have opposite effects on the level of participation taxes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Hysteresis and its Modeling Credit Horizons Estimation of Heuristic Switching in Behavioral Macroeconomic Models Coupled Climate-Economy-Ecology (CoCEB) Modeling: A Dynamic Approach Post Keynesian Economics Is Based on Joan Robinson’s Many Canards About Supposed Gaping Holes in Keynes’s Theory: The Real Problem Is Gaping Holes and Gross Ignorance in the Post Keynesian Understanding of Keynes’s a Treatise on Probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1