探索者和旅行者的报告和对死藤水的第一次科学研究(1850年至1950年)在当前关于“迷幻剂复兴”的辩论中。

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0104-59702023000100023en
Vinícius Maurício de Lima, Maria Gabriela Silva Martins da Cunha Marinho
{"title":"探索者和旅行者的报告和对死藤水的第一次科学研究(1850年至1950年)在当前关于“迷幻剂复兴”的辩论中。","authors":"Vinícius Maurício de Lima, Maria Gabriela Silva Martins da Cunha Marinho","doi":"10.1590/s0104-59702023000100023en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article describes the associations and controversies between indigenous and western uses of ayahuasca between 1850 and 1950 in relation to the “psychedelic renaissance.” This movement has gained scientific attention since 2000, but hearkens back to the 1960s and 1970s, when anti-drug policy halted research on the “therapeutic potential” of psychoactive substances. Pioneering studies on ayahuasca date back to the early twentieth century and mention reports of expeditions to Amazonia from 1850 onward. Here, these articles and reports are analyzed according to the historical aspect of actor-network theory and recent studies. We infer that history casts light on the current political debate about indigenous uses, classifications, and meanings, pharmaceutical interest in ayahuasca, and the debate on “drugs.”","PeriodicalId":13134,"journal":{"name":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reports by explorers and travelers and the first scientific studies on ayahuasca (dating from 1850 to 1950) within the current debate on the “psychedelic renaissance”\",\"authors\":\"Vinícius Maurício de Lima, Maria Gabriela Silva Martins da Cunha Marinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0104-59702023000100023en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article describes the associations and controversies between indigenous and western uses of ayahuasca between 1850 and 1950 in relation to the “psychedelic renaissance.” This movement has gained scientific attention since 2000, but hearkens back to the 1960s and 1970s, when anti-drug policy halted research on the “therapeutic potential” of psychoactive substances. Pioneering studies on ayahuasca date back to the early twentieth century and mention reports of expeditions to Amazonia from 1850 onward. Here, these articles and reports are analyzed according to the historical aspect of actor-network theory and recent studies. We infer that history casts light on the current political debate about indigenous uses, classifications, and meanings, pharmaceutical interest in ayahuasca, and the debate on “drugs.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":13134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702023000100023en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702023000100023en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文描述了1850年至1950年间与“迷幻文艺复兴”相关的土著和西方死藤水使用之间的联系和争议。自2000年以来,这一运动得到了科学界的关注,但让人想起了20世纪60年代和70年代,当时禁毒政策停止了对精神活性物质“治疗潜力”的研究。对死藤水的开创性研究可以追溯到20世纪初,并提到了1850年以后对亚马逊河流域的探险报告。本文从行动者网络理论的历史沿沿性和最新研究成果两个方面对这些文章和报道进行分析。我们推断,历史揭示了当前关于土著使用、分类和意义的政治辩论,对死藤水的制药兴趣,以及关于“毒品”的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reports by explorers and travelers and the first scientific studies on ayahuasca (dating from 1850 to 1950) within the current debate on the “psychedelic renaissance”
Abstract This article describes the associations and controversies between indigenous and western uses of ayahuasca between 1850 and 1950 in relation to the “psychedelic renaissance.” This movement has gained scientific attention since 2000, but hearkens back to the 1960s and 1970s, when anti-drug policy halted research on the “therapeutic potential” of psychoactive substances. Pioneering studies on ayahuasca date back to the early twentieth century and mention reports of expeditions to Amazonia from 1850 onward. Here, these articles and reports are analyzed according to the historical aspect of actor-network theory and recent studies. We infer that history casts light on the current political debate about indigenous uses, classifications, and meanings, pharmaceutical interest in ayahuasca, and the debate on “drugs.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Environment and public health: epidemics in Modern Age Portugal]. Circulation of ideas about schizophrenia within the psychiatric context of Rio de Janeiro in the 1910s and 1920s. "Éden Fluminense:" from a reforestation area on the Tijuca massif to a Europeanized public space in Rio de Janeiro in the latter half of the nineteenth century. [Biomedicalization and responses to aids in Brazil: research notes]. [Evidence of tangible and intangible heritage in the Manguinhos territory].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1