测量工作场所的DEI:质疑理论、实证和实践模型

A. Bowe, Elizabeth R. Drame, Dominique Duval-Diop, Lynnette Mawhinney, Carla Melaco
{"title":"测量工作场所的DEI:质疑理论、实证和实践模型","authors":"A. Bowe, Elizabeth R. Drame, Dominique Duval-Diop, Lynnette Mawhinney, Carla Melaco","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BECO designed an Equity Audit tool to measure racial diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions (K-12 schools, For-Profits, and Non-Profits) and is currently undergoing the Standard Setting Process. This study reports on quantitative and qualitative findings for For-Profits and Non-Profits and by doing so, extends the conversation regarding the theoretical, empirical, and practical issues we encounter with the social reality of DEI work. Empirical findings via confirmatory factor analyses reveal at least reasonable fit of the tool which supports the measurement theory undergirding the tool. Qualitative findings demonstrate mixed opinions among experts as to how diversity, equity, and inclusion constructs relate, thus highlighting the unclarity about how we should engage in DEI work in workplaces. Altogether, we discuss findings in relation to the call for empirical work to ground sociological theories and constructs, and the extent to which progression in the field of diversity management aligns with the success and sustainability of DEI work.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring DEI within workplaces: questioning the theoretical, empirical, and practical models\",\"authors\":\"A. Bowe, Elizabeth R. Drame, Dominique Duval-Diop, Lynnette Mawhinney, Carla Melaco\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07591063231184252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BECO designed an Equity Audit tool to measure racial diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions (K-12 schools, For-Profits, and Non-Profits) and is currently undergoing the Standard Setting Process. This study reports on quantitative and qualitative findings for For-Profits and Non-Profits and by doing so, extends the conversation regarding the theoretical, empirical, and practical issues we encounter with the social reality of DEI work. Empirical findings via confirmatory factor analyses reveal at least reasonable fit of the tool which supports the measurement theory undergirding the tool. Qualitative findings demonstrate mixed opinions among experts as to how diversity, equity, and inclusion constructs relate, thus highlighting the unclarity about how we should engage in DEI work in workplaces. Altogether, we discuss findings in relation to the call for empirical work to ground sociological theories and constructs, and the extent to which progression in the field of diversity management aligns with the success and sustainability of DEI work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

BECO设计了一个公平审计工具来衡量工作场所的种族多样性、公平和包容(DEI)。该工具有三个版本(K-12学校,营利和非营利),目前正在进行标准制定过程。本研究报告了营利性和非营利组织的定量和定性发现,并通过这样做,扩展了关于我们在DEI工作的社会现实中遇到的理论,经验和实践问题的对话。通过验证性因素分析的实证研究结果揭示了至少合理的工具拟合,支持工具的测量理论。定性研究结果表明,专家们对多样性、公平和包容结构之间的关系持不同意见,从而突出了我们应该如何在工作场所从事DEI工作的不确定性。总之,我们讨论了与实证工作的呼吁相关的发现,以奠定社会学理论和结构,以及多样性管理领域的进展与DEI工作的成功和可持续性在多大程度上保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring DEI within workplaces: questioning the theoretical, empirical, and practical models
BECO designed an Equity Audit tool to measure racial diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions (K-12 schools, For-Profits, and Non-Profits) and is currently undergoing the Standard Setting Process. This study reports on quantitative and qualitative findings for For-Profits and Non-Profits and by doing so, extends the conversation regarding the theoretical, empirical, and practical issues we encounter with the social reality of DEI work. Empirical findings via confirmatory factor analyses reveal at least reasonable fit of the tool which supports the measurement theory undergirding the tool. Qualitative findings demonstrate mixed opinions among experts as to how diversity, equity, and inclusion constructs relate, thus highlighting the unclarity about how we should engage in DEI work in workplaces. Altogether, we discuss findings in relation to the call for empirical work to ground sociological theories and constructs, and the extent to which progression in the field of diversity management aligns with the success and sustainability of DEI work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Where it turns out that the method does not break the glass ceiling… Comment les citoyens et les citoyennes s’informent ? Retour sur un dispositif d’enquête original à partir d’entretiens de couple Un exemple de combinaison de méthodes. Les enquêtes (Cevipof) sur « Les perceptions de la probité publique » Experimenting with experiments: a ‘Shandean’ approach The interplay of incentives and mode-choice design in self-administered mixed-mode surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1