{"title":"评估疾病特异性抗核抗体的流行及其在叙利亚风湿病诊断中的检测","authors":"Widad Babelly, Abduljalil Ghrewaty, M. K. Dababo","doi":"10.37285/ijpsn.2022.15.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detection is a crucial laboratory test for diagnosing systemic autoimmune disorders and is commonly the initial step in autoantibodies screening. ANA are immunoglobulins that differentiate a wide range of nuclear and cytoplasmic components. ANAs are consistently present in the sera of patients with a variety of rheumatic disorders. The purpose of the study was to investigate the kinds and the expansion of disease-specific antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and their link to rheumatic disorders in the general Syrian people. \nMethod: Immunofluorescence (IIF) was used for testing ANA in serum samples gained from 529 patients. Individualities positive for IF ANA were further tested for disease specific ANAs using line Immunoblot assay. \nResults: Based on the result of the IF ANA assay, the rates of positive samples were 7.9%. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 7and 6 individuals, respectively, anti Scl70, anti-Nucleosome, anti-U1-RNP, anti-CENP B were detected in 4 different individuals, but anti-Sm, anti-PCNA, and anti-Jo-1 antibodies were undetectable. Among 42 IF ANA positive individualities, 24 were found to have disease specific ANAs: nine SLE, three Sclerosis, and two rheumatoid arthritis. \nConclusions ANA should generally not be examined without a clinical indication. Positive ANA finding in the absence of clinical symptoms and signs has limited diagnostic usefulness and should be interpreted by a rheumatologist constantly, in the context of clinical symptoms and the results of laboratory tests for specific autoantibodies.","PeriodicalId":14382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Prevalence of Disease-Specific Antinuclear Antibodies and their Detection in Diagnosis of Rheumatic Disorders in Syria\",\"authors\":\"Widad Babelly, Abduljalil Ghrewaty, M. K. Dababo\",\"doi\":\"10.37285/ijpsn.2022.15.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detection is a crucial laboratory test for diagnosing systemic autoimmune disorders and is commonly the initial step in autoantibodies screening. ANA are immunoglobulins that differentiate a wide range of nuclear and cytoplasmic components. ANAs are consistently present in the sera of patients with a variety of rheumatic disorders. The purpose of the study was to investigate the kinds and the expansion of disease-specific antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and their link to rheumatic disorders in the general Syrian people. \\nMethod: Immunofluorescence (IIF) was used for testing ANA in serum samples gained from 529 patients. Individualities positive for IF ANA were further tested for disease specific ANAs using line Immunoblot assay. \\nResults: Based on the result of the IF ANA assay, the rates of positive samples were 7.9%. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 7and 6 individuals, respectively, anti Scl70, anti-Nucleosome, anti-U1-RNP, anti-CENP B were detected in 4 different individuals, but anti-Sm, anti-PCNA, and anti-Jo-1 antibodies were undetectable. Among 42 IF ANA positive individualities, 24 were found to have disease specific ANAs: nine SLE, three Sclerosis, and two rheumatoid arthritis. \\nConclusions ANA should generally not be examined without a clinical indication. Positive ANA finding in the absence of clinical symptoms and signs has limited diagnostic usefulness and should be interpreted by a rheumatologist constantly, in the context of clinical symptoms and the results of laboratory tests for specific autoantibodies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2022.15.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37285/ijpsn.2022.15.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Prevalence of Disease-Specific Antinuclear Antibodies and their Detection in Diagnosis of Rheumatic Disorders in Syria
Background: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detection is a crucial laboratory test for diagnosing systemic autoimmune disorders and is commonly the initial step in autoantibodies screening. ANA are immunoglobulins that differentiate a wide range of nuclear and cytoplasmic components. ANAs are consistently present in the sera of patients with a variety of rheumatic disorders. The purpose of the study was to investigate the kinds and the expansion of disease-specific antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and their link to rheumatic disorders in the general Syrian people.
Method: Immunofluorescence (IIF) was used for testing ANA in serum samples gained from 529 patients. Individualities positive for IF ANA were further tested for disease specific ANAs using line Immunoblot assay.
Results: Based on the result of the IF ANA assay, the rates of positive samples were 7.9%. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 7and 6 individuals, respectively, anti Scl70, anti-Nucleosome, anti-U1-RNP, anti-CENP B were detected in 4 different individuals, but anti-Sm, anti-PCNA, and anti-Jo-1 antibodies were undetectable. Among 42 IF ANA positive individualities, 24 were found to have disease specific ANAs: nine SLE, three Sclerosis, and two rheumatoid arthritis.
Conclusions ANA should generally not be examined without a clinical indication. Positive ANA finding in the absence of clinical symptoms and signs has limited diagnostic usefulness and should be interpreted by a rheumatologist constantly, in the context of clinical symptoms and the results of laboratory tests for specific autoantibodies.