保持消费者参与弗里曼特尔初级预防研究:一项基于全科医生团队的心血管风险降低研究

C. Bulsara, T. Brett, Karla L. Seaman, D. Arnold-Reed
{"title":"保持消费者参与弗里曼特尔初级预防研究:一项基于全科医生团队的心血管风险降低研究","authors":"C. Bulsara, T. Brett, Karla L. Seaman, D. Arnold-Reed","doi":"10.5176/2345-718X_1.2.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recruitment and retention of participants to lifestyle modification studies can be challenging within a primary care setting. The management of factors such as travel, busy lifestyles and lack of regular follow up of participants can result in considerable attrition rates over the lifecycle of the project. The aim of the study was to understand from a research participant perspective the perceived barriers and facilitators in retaining community participants in primary health care research. This is a qualitative study with data collected from four focus groups facilitated at the end of each of three community forums focusing on sharing the findings of the Fremantle Primary Prevention Study. Overall twelve focus groups were facilitated with participants that had usual care or who were in the intervention arm of the Fremantle Primary Prevention study. Group size ranged from 6 to 10 participants with the interviewer following a semi structured focus group schedule. Thematic analysis extracted common themes from each focus group around contributing factors to participation. The key message was that relationships built over a longer time period with a GP, practice nurses and other practice staff was an important factor in retention of participants. In addition, ease of travel, convenience and regular check ups with the practice were all significant enticement to remain in a study over the course of the research. Being part of their regular GP practice’s involvement in a study was clearly worthwhile as an incentive for participants and offers hope for practice-based research networks undertaking other community-based studies in the future.","PeriodicalId":91870,"journal":{"name":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retaining consumer participation in the Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a general practice team based cardiovascular risk reduction study\",\"authors\":\"C. Bulsara, T. Brett, Karla L. Seaman, D. Arnold-Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.5176/2345-718X_1.2.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recruitment and retention of participants to lifestyle modification studies can be challenging within a primary care setting. The management of factors such as travel, busy lifestyles and lack of regular follow up of participants can result in considerable attrition rates over the lifecycle of the project. The aim of the study was to understand from a research participant perspective the perceived barriers and facilitators in retaining community participants in primary health care research. This is a qualitative study with data collected from four focus groups facilitated at the end of each of three community forums focusing on sharing the findings of the Fremantle Primary Prevention Study. Overall twelve focus groups were facilitated with participants that had usual care or who were in the intervention arm of the Fremantle Primary Prevention study. Group size ranged from 6 to 10 participants with the interviewer following a semi structured focus group schedule. Thematic analysis extracted common themes from each focus group around contributing factors to participation. The key message was that relationships built over a longer time period with a GP, practice nurses and other practice staff was an important factor in retention of participants. In addition, ease of travel, convenience and regular check ups with the practice were all significant enticement to remain in a study over the course of the research. Being part of their regular GP practice’s involvement in a study was clearly worthwhile as an incentive for participants and offers hope for practice-based research networks undertaking other community-based studies in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GSTF journal of nursing and health care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GSTF journal of nursing and health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-718X_1.2.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-718X_1.2.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在初级保健机构中,招募和保留生活方式改变研究的参与者是具有挑战性的。对诸如旅行、繁忙的生活方式和缺乏定期跟踪参与者等因素的管理可能导致项目生命周期中相当大的损失率。本研究的目的是从研究参与者的角度了解在初级卫生保健研究中保留社区参与者的障碍和促进因素。这是一项定性研究,收集了从四个焦点小组收集的数据,这些小组在三个社区论坛的每个论坛结束时得到促进,重点是分享弗里曼特尔初级预防研究的结果。总共有12个焦点小组的参与者接受了常规护理或参加了弗里曼特尔初级预防研究的干预小组。小组规模从6到10人不等,面试官遵循半结构化的焦点小组时间表。专题分析从每个焦点小组中提炼出共同的主题,围绕影响参与的因素。关键信息是,与全科医生、执业护士和其他执业人员建立的长期关系是留住参与者的重要因素。此外,在研究过程中,旅行的便利性、便利性和定期检查都是吸引参与者继续参与研究的重要因素。作为常规全科医生实践的一部分,参与一项研究显然是值得的,这对参与者来说是一种激励,并为未来开展其他以社区为基础的研究网络提供了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retaining consumer participation in the Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a general practice team based cardiovascular risk reduction study
Recruitment and retention of participants to lifestyle modification studies can be challenging within a primary care setting. The management of factors such as travel, busy lifestyles and lack of regular follow up of participants can result in considerable attrition rates over the lifecycle of the project. The aim of the study was to understand from a research participant perspective the perceived barriers and facilitators in retaining community participants in primary health care research. This is a qualitative study with data collected from four focus groups facilitated at the end of each of three community forums focusing on sharing the findings of the Fremantle Primary Prevention Study. Overall twelve focus groups were facilitated with participants that had usual care or who were in the intervention arm of the Fremantle Primary Prevention study. Group size ranged from 6 to 10 participants with the interviewer following a semi structured focus group schedule. Thematic analysis extracted common themes from each focus group around contributing factors to participation. The key message was that relationships built over a longer time period with a GP, practice nurses and other practice staff was an important factor in retention of participants. In addition, ease of travel, convenience and regular check ups with the practice were all significant enticement to remain in a study over the course of the research. Being part of their regular GP practice’s involvement in a study was clearly worthwhile as an incentive for participants and offers hope for practice-based research networks undertaking other community-based studies in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Surrogacy Morally Acceptable in Hong Kong? Coping Behaviors and Collaboration among Staff of Multiple Occupation Classifications during Norovirus Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with and without heart failure Management of Volunteer Activities Among Elderly Persons Compassion Fatigue among Healthcare Personnel in Acute Care Contexts: An Integrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1