一个ICGA评价函数

J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc. Pub Date : 2020-02-06 DOI:10.3233/icg-190129

J. Schaeffer

{"title":"一个ICGA评价函数","authors":"J. Schaeffer","doi":"10.3233/icg-190129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The survey was sent to 206 individuals/organizations, including all current ICGA members as well as recent former ICGA members for whom we had an email address. Some of these addresses were invalid, resulting in 194 requests for which we might get a response. In the end, 41 submissions were received via the online survey form, and an additional 4 by email. Of the 45 responses, 75% were from current members, and 25% from former members. Thus the response rate was 45/194 = 23%, quite good by the usual survey standards. Thank you to everyone who responded.","PeriodicalId":14829,"journal":{"name":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","volume":"20 1","pages":"200-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ICGA evaluation function\",\"authors\":\"J. Schaeffer\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/icg-190129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The survey was sent to 206 individuals/organizations, including all current ICGA members as well as recent former ICGA members for whom we had an email address. Some of these addresses were invalid, resulting in 194 requests for which we might get a response. In the end, 41 submissions were received via the online survey form, and an additional 4 by email. Of the 45 responses, 75% were from current members, and 25% from former members. Thus the response rate was 45/194 = 23%, quite good by the usual survey standards. Thank you to everyone who responded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"200-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/icg-190129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/icg-190129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

该调查被发送给206个个人/组织，包括所有当前的ICGA会员，以及最近的ICGA前会员，我们有一个电子邮件地址。其中一些地址无效，导致194个请求，我们可能会得到响应。最后，通过在线调查表格收到了41份意见书，另外通过电子邮件收到了4份意见书。在45份回复中，75%来自现任会员，25%来自前会员。因此，回复率为45/194 = 23%，以通常的调查标准来看是相当不错的。感谢每一个回应我的人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

An ICGA evaluation function

The survey was sent to 206 individuals/organizations, including all current ICGA members as well as recent former ICGA members for whom we had an email address. Some of these addresses were invalid, resulting in 194 requests for which we might get a response. In the end, 41 submissions were received via the online survey form, and an additional 4 by email. Of the 45 responses, 75% were from current members, and 25% from former members. Thus the response rate was 45/194 = 23%, quite good by the usual survey standards. Thank you to everyone who responded.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Editorial: Rankings and ratings Automated videogame mechanics generation with XVGDL Editorial: Jan Krabbenbos, Videogames, CG 2022 and the 2022 WCCC The 2022 World Computer Chess Championships The SSDF Chess Engine Rating List, 2020-12