{"title":"肾替代治疗患者腹膜透析与血液透析之间动脉僵硬度的评价","authors":"Tufan Günay, D. Topal, S. Akgür","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1296458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β), calculated noninvasively with the pressure change caused by arterial strain and volume changes on echocardiography, shows a strong correlation with invasive measurements of arterial stiffness. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness and distensibility between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and patients in renal replacement therapy.\nMethods: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 108 patients under renal replacement therapy (PD and HD). The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β) was calculated for each group. \nResults: The mean age of the patients in the study was 58.2±11.1 years, and 49 (45.4%) of the patients were female and 59 (54.6%) were male. Age, gender, comorbid rates, and levels of blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the PD and HD groups. Blood pressure levels and heart rate. Mean aortic strain (5.6±1.9 vs. 9.4±2.8, p < 0.001) and median distensibility (1.5 vs. 2.9 cm, p < 0.001) were lower in the PD group than the HD group, while median ASI-β (11.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001) and mean E/e’ (10.6±2.9 vs. 9.2±2.3, p = 0.006) were higher in the PD group. The rate of concentric hypertrophy was higher in the PD group (47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005).\nConclusion: PD patients have higher arterial stiffness and lower distensibility levels compared to HD patients. Therefore, patients with PD may be more prone to diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and events.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of arterial stiffness between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with renal replacement therapy\",\"authors\":\"Tufan Günay, D. Topal, S. Akgür\",\"doi\":\"10.18621/eurj.1296458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β), calculated noninvasively with the pressure change caused by arterial strain and volume changes on echocardiography, shows a strong correlation with invasive measurements of arterial stiffness. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness and distensibility between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and patients in renal replacement therapy.\\nMethods: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 108 patients under renal replacement therapy (PD and HD). The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β) was calculated for each group. \\nResults: The mean age of the patients in the study was 58.2±11.1 years, and 49 (45.4%) of the patients were female and 59 (54.6%) were male. Age, gender, comorbid rates, and levels of blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the PD and HD groups. Blood pressure levels and heart rate. Mean aortic strain (5.6±1.9 vs. 9.4±2.8, p < 0.001) and median distensibility (1.5 vs. 2.9 cm, p < 0.001) were lower in the PD group than the HD group, while median ASI-β (11.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001) and mean E/e’ (10.6±2.9 vs. 9.2±2.3, p = 0.006) were higher in the PD group. The rate of concentric hypertrophy was higher in the PD group (47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005).\\nConclusion: PD patients have higher arterial stiffness and lower distensibility levels compared to HD patients. Therefore, patients with PD may be more prone to diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1296458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1296458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:主动脉硬度指数β (ASI-β)是通过超声心动图上动脉应变和容积变化引起的压力变化无创计算得出的,它与动脉硬度的有创测量结果有很强的相关性。本研究旨在比较腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)患者与肾脏替代治疗患者的动脉僵硬性和扩张性。方法:本横断面观察性研究分析了108例接受肾脏替代治疗(PD和HD)的患者。计算各组主动脉硬度指数β (ASI-β)。结果:本组患者平均年龄为58.2±11.1岁,女性49例(45.4%),男性59例(54.6%)。年龄、性别、合并症发生率、血压和心率水平在PD组和HD组之间没有差异。血压水平和心率。PD组平均主动脉应变(5.6±1.9比9.4±2.8,p < 0.001)和中位扩张率(1.5比2.9 cm, p < 0.001)低于HD组,而PD组中位ASI-β(11.6比6.2,p < 0.001)和平均E/ E′(10.6±2.9比9.2±2.3,p = 0.006)高于HD组。PD组同心圆肥大率较高(47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005)。结论:与HD患者相比,PD患者有较高的动脉僵硬度和较低的动脉扩张性。因此,PD患者可能更容易发生舒张功能障碍、心血管疾病和事件。
Evaluation of arterial stiffness between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with renal replacement therapy
Objectives: The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β), calculated noninvasively with the pressure change caused by arterial strain and volume changes on echocardiography, shows a strong correlation with invasive measurements of arterial stiffness. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness and distensibility between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and patients in renal replacement therapy.
Methods: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 108 patients under renal replacement therapy (PD and HD). The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β) was calculated for each group.
Results: The mean age of the patients in the study was 58.2±11.1 years, and 49 (45.4%) of the patients were female and 59 (54.6%) were male. Age, gender, comorbid rates, and levels of blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the PD and HD groups. Blood pressure levels and heart rate. Mean aortic strain (5.6±1.9 vs. 9.4±2.8, p < 0.001) and median distensibility (1.5 vs. 2.9 cm, p < 0.001) were lower in the PD group than the HD group, while median ASI-β (11.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001) and mean E/e’ (10.6±2.9 vs. 9.2±2.3, p = 0.006) were higher in the PD group. The rate of concentric hypertrophy was higher in the PD group (47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005).
Conclusion: PD patients have higher arterial stiffness and lower distensibility levels compared to HD patients. Therefore, patients with PD may be more prone to diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and events.