理解版权欺诈:公共领域图像和虚假的版权声明

IF 0.2 0 ART Art Documentation Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1086/694241
C. Needham
{"title":"理解版权欺诈:公共领域图像和虚假的版权声明","authors":"C. Needham","doi":"10.1086/694241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright fraud or copyfraud—when museums misrepresent or restrict rights in ways that go against public domain copyright law—continues to be a widespread practice even in the years following the 1999 Bridgeman Art Library, LTD. v. Corel Corp. court case. To help clarify this situation, the author first reviews the relevant copyright issues, then considers some of the problems that copyfraud creates in universities, publishing houses, and museums. In conclusion, he explores the ways museums, supported by their librarians and visual resources managers, have recently changed their approach to copyright and copyfraud, and the ways in which this is transforming scholarship and allowing scholars and librarians to better serve the public.","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"75 1","pages":"219 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Copyfraud: Public Domain Images and False Claims of Copyright\",\"authors\":\"C. Needham\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/694241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copyright fraud or copyfraud—when museums misrepresent or restrict rights in ways that go against public domain copyright law—continues to be a widespread practice even in the years following the 1999 Bridgeman Art Library, LTD. v. Corel Corp. court case. To help clarify this situation, the author first reviews the relevant copyright issues, then considers some of the problems that copyfraud creates in universities, publishing houses, and museums. In conclusion, he explores the ways museums, supported by their librarians and visual resources managers, have recently changed their approach to copyright and copyfraud, and the ways in which this is transforming scholarship and allowing scholars and librarians to better serve the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Documentation\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/694241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/694241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

即使在1999年布里奇曼艺术图书馆有限公司(Bridgeman Art Library, LTD.)诉Corel Corp.一案之后的几年里,版权欺诈或版权欺诈——博物馆以违反公共领域版权法的方式歪曲或限制权利——仍然是一种普遍的做法。为了澄清这一情况,作者首先回顾了相关的版权问题,然后考虑了大学、出版社和博物馆中假冒欺诈造成的一些问题。最后,他探讨了博物馆在图书管理员和视觉资源管理人员的支持下,最近如何改变了他们对待版权和版权欺诈的方式,以及这种方式如何改变了学术研究,使学者和图书管理员能够更好地为公众服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Copyfraud: Public Domain Images and False Claims of Copyright
Copyright fraud or copyfraud—when museums misrepresent or restrict rights in ways that go against public domain copyright law—continues to be a widespread practice even in the years following the 1999 Bridgeman Art Library, LTD. v. Corel Corp. court case. To help clarify this situation, the author first reviews the relevant copyright issues, then considers some of the problems that copyfraud creates in universities, publishing houses, and museums. In conclusion, he explores the ways museums, supported by their librarians and visual resources managers, have recently changed their approach to copyright and copyfraud, and the ways in which this is transforming scholarship and allowing scholars and librarians to better serve the public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Medhat-Lecocq, Héba (2021) : Terminologie comparée et traduction. Approche interdisciplinaire. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 260 p. Tao, Li and Kaibao, Hu (2021): Reappraising Self and Others: A Corpus-Based Study of Chinese Political Discourse in English Translation. Singapore: Springer, 194 p. Hartmann, Esa et Hersant, Patrick, dir. (2019) : Au miroir de la traduction. Avant-texte, intratexte, paratexte. Multilinguisme. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 228 p. Caliendo, Giuditta et Oster, Corinne (2020) : Traduire la criminalité : Perspectives traductologiques et discursives. Lille : Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 260 p. Pajević, Marko (2019): The Henri Meschonnic Reader: A Poetics of Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 320 p.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1