“这正常吗?”徒弟们的经历教会了我们很多关于实践和政策的东西

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Vocational Education and Training Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663
Tanya Lawes
{"title":"“这正常吗?”徒弟们的经历教会了我们很多关于实践和政策的东西","authors":"Tanya Lawes","doi":"10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Is that normal?” What the experiences of apprentices teach us about practice and policy Tanya Lawes Open University, United Kingdom This study exposes the absence of apprentice voice in debates about quality, and explains the implications from a theoretical position of learning as a social construct. The early years of the 21st century witnessed a rapid growth in apprenticeships in England, with starts rising from 167,700 in 2002/3 to 375,800 in 2017/18. Ownership of the definition of apprenticeships is a contested matter with successive governments claiming that apprenticeships provide an alternative to university, and a cure for national skills shortages, social inequality and youth unemployment. Quality is conceived and measured using narrow economicand employment-centred metrics. How apprentices conceive quality and success is largely unknown or ignored. I make the case that it is only by understanding the experiences and views of apprentices that we can start to make any headway into improving the quality of delivery. I interviewed 33 apprentices to determine what it is like to ‘do’ an apprenticeship and to ‘be’ an apprentice. The ethnographic methodology used champions the apprentices’ points-of-view, and allows me to discuss my findings in the context of theories about knowledge, identity, relationships, choice and power. CONTACT Tanya Lawes tanya.lawes@education.gov.uk Degree and year: EdD 2020 Supervisors: Professor Peter Lavender, University of Wolverhampton; Dr Jonathan Hughes, Open University. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING 2021, VOL. 73, NO. 4, 613 https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663 © 2021 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd","PeriodicalId":46718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","volume":"3 1","pages":"613 - 613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Is that normal?” What the experiences of apprentices teach us about practice and policy\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Lawes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Is that normal?” What the experiences of apprentices teach us about practice and policy Tanya Lawes Open University, United Kingdom This study exposes the absence of apprentice voice in debates about quality, and explains the implications from a theoretical position of learning as a social construct. The early years of the 21st century witnessed a rapid growth in apprenticeships in England, with starts rising from 167,700 in 2002/3 to 375,800 in 2017/18. Ownership of the definition of apprenticeships is a contested matter with successive governments claiming that apprenticeships provide an alternative to university, and a cure for national skills shortages, social inequality and youth unemployment. Quality is conceived and measured using narrow economicand employment-centred metrics. How apprentices conceive quality and success is largely unknown or ignored. I make the case that it is only by understanding the experiences and views of apprentices that we can start to make any headway into improving the quality of delivery. I interviewed 33 apprentices to determine what it is like to ‘do’ an apprenticeship and to ‘be’ an apprentice. The ethnographic methodology used champions the apprentices’ points-of-view, and allows me to discuss my findings in the context of theories about knowledge, identity, relationships, choice and power. CONTACT Tanya Lawes tanya.lawes@education.gov.uk Degree and year: EdD 2020 Supervisors: Professor Peter Lavender, University of Wolverhampton; Dr Jonathan Hughes, Open University. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING 2021, VOL. 73, NO. 4, 613 https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663 © 2021 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd\",\"PeriodicalId\":46718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vocational Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"613 - 613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vocational Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“这正常吗?”本研究揭示了学徒在关于质量的辩论中缺乏发言权,并从学习作为一种社会建构的理论立场解释了其含义。21世纪初,英国学徒人数迅速增长,从2002/3年的167,700人增加到2017/18年的375,800人。学徒制定义的归属是一个有争议的问题,历届政府都声称学徒制提供了大学之外的另一种选择,是解决国家技能短缺、社会不平等和青年失业问题的良方。质量是用狭隘的以经济和就业为中心的指标来构想和衡量的。学徒们如何理解质量和成功在很大程度上是未知或被忽视的。我认为,只有通过了解学徒的经验和观点,我们才能开始在提高交付质量方面取得进展。我采访了33名学徒,以确定“做”学徒和“成为”学徒是什么感觉。所使用的民族志方法支持学徒的观点,并允许我在知识、身份、关系、选择和权力等理论的背景下讨论我的发现。联系方式Tanya Lawes tanya.lawes@education.gov.uk学位和年份:EdD 2020导师:Peter Lavender教授,伍尔弗汉普顿大学;乔纳森·休斯博士,开放大学。《职业教育与培训学报》2021年第73卷第1期4,613 https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663©2021 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Is that normal?” What the experiences of apprentices teach us about practice and policy
“Is that normal?” What the experiences of apprentices teach us about practice and policy Tanya Lawes Open University, United Kingdom This study exposes the absence of apprentice voice in debates about quality, and explains the implications from a theoretical position of learning as a social construct. The early years of the 21st century witnessed a rapid growth in apprenticeships in England, with starts rising from 167,700 in 2002/3 to 375,800 in 2017/18. Ownership of the definition of apprenticeships is a contested matter with successive governments claiming that apprenticeships provide an alternative to university, and a cure for national skills shortages, social inequality and youth unemployment. Quality is conceived and measured using narrow economicand employment-centred metrics. How apprentices conceive quality and success is largely unknown or ignored. I make the case that it is only by understanding the experiences and views of apprentices that we can start to make any headway into improving the quality of delivery. I interviewed 33 apprentices to determine what it is like to ‘do’ an apprenticeship and to ‘be’ an apprentice. The ethnographic methodology used champions the apprentices’ points-of-view, and allows me to discuss my findings in the context of theories about knowledge, identity, relationships, choice and power. CONTACT Tanya Lawes tanya.lawes@education.gov.uk Degree and year: EdD 2020 Supervisors: Professor Peter Lavender, University of Wolverhampton; Dr Jonathan Hughes, Open University. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING 2021, VOL. 73, NO. 4, 613 https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1995663 © 2021 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal of Vocational Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Education and Training is a peer-reviewed international journal which welcomes submissions involving a critical discussion of policy and practice, as well as contributions to conceptual and theoretical developments in the field. It includes articles based on empirical research and analysis (quantitative, qualitative and mixed method) and welcomes papers from a wide range of disciplinary and inter-disciplinary perspectives. The journal embraces the broad range of settings and ways in which vocational and professional learning takes place and, hence, is not restricted by institutional boundaries or structures in relation to national systems of education and training. It is interested in the study of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment, as well as economic, cultural and political aspects related to the role of vocational and professional education and training in society. When submitting papers for consideration, the journal encourages authors to consider and engage with debates concerning issues relevant to the focus of their work that have been previously published in the journal. The journal hosts a biennial international conference to provide a forum for researchers to debate and gain feedback on their work, and to encourage comparative analysis and international collaboration. From the first issue of Volume 48, 1996, the journal changed its title from The Vocational Aspect of Education to Journal of Vocational Education and Training.
期刊最新文献
Vocational education for a sustainable future: Unveiling the collaborative learning narratives to make space for learning Responsive curriculum development: which factors support breaking through institutional barriers? From training workers to educating global citizens: how teachers view their opportunities of addressing controversial global issues in vocational education Doctoral theses abstracts in vocational education The mediating role of further and higher education in a Just Transition social ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1