一种在有序尺度栅格代价曲面上寻找最小代价廊道的方法

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Annals of GIS Pub Date : 2023-01-20 DOI:10.1080/19475683.2023.2166585
L. Seegmiller, T. Shirabe
{"title":"一种在有序尺度栅格代价曲面上寻找最小代价廊道的方法","authors":"L. Seegmiller, T. Shirabe","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2023.2166585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The least-cost path problem is a widely studied problems in geographic information science. In raster space, the problem is to find a path that accumulates the least amount of cost between two locations based on the assumptions that the path is a one-dimensional object (represented by a string of cells) and that the cost (per unit length) is measured on a quantitative scale. Efficient methods are available for solution of this problem when at least one of these assumptions is upheld. This is not the case when the path has a width and is a two-dimensional object called a corridor (represented by a swath of cells) and the cost (per unit area) is measured on an ordinal scale. In this paper, we propose one additional model that characterizes a least-cost corridor on an ordinal-scaled raster cost surface – or a least ordinal-scaled cost corridor for short – and show that it can be transformed into an instance of a multiobjective optimization problem known as the preferred path problem with a lexicographic preference relation and solved accordingly. The model is tested through computational experiments with artificial landscape data as well as real-world data. Results show that least ordinal-scaled cost corridors are guaranteed to contain smaller areas of higher cost than conventional least-cost corridors at the expense of more elongated and winding forms. The least ordinal-scaled cost corridor problem has computational complexity of O(n 2.5) in the worst case, resulting in a longer computational time than least-cost corridors. However, this difference is smaller in practice.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"140 1","pages":"205 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method for finding a least-cost corridor on an ordinal-scaled raster cost surface\",\"authors\":\"L. Seegmiller, T. Shirabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19475683.2023.2166585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The least-cost path problem is a widely studied problems in geographic information science. In raster space, the problem is to find a path that accumulates the least amount of cost between two locations based on the assumptions that the path is a one-dimensional object (represented by a string of cells) and that the cost (per unit length) is measured on a quantitative scale. Efficient methods are available for solution of this problem when at least one of these assumptions is upheld. This is not the case when the path has a width and is a two-dimensional object called a corridor (represented by a swath of cells) and the cost (per unit area) is measured on an ordinal scale. In this paper, we propose one additional model that characterizes a least-cost corridor on an ordinal-scaled raster cost surface – or a least ordinal-scaled cost corridor for short – and show that it can be transformed into an instance of a multiobjective optimization problem known as the preferred path problem with a lexicographic preference relation and solved accordingly. The model is tested through computational experiments with artificial landscape data as well as real-world data. Results show that least ordinal-scaled cost corridors are guaranteed to contain smaller areas of higher cost than conventional least-cost corridors at the expense of more elongated and winding forms. The least ordinal-scaled cost corridor problem has computational complexity of O(n 2.5) in the worst case, resulting in a longer computational time than least-cost corridors. However, this difference is smaller in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2166585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2166585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小代价路径问题是地理信息科学中一个被广泛研究的问题。在栅格空间中,问题是根据路径是一维对象(由一串单元表示)和成本(每单位长度)是定量测量的假设,找到两个位置之间累积成本最少的路径。当这些假设中至少有一个成立时,解决这个问题的有效方法是可用的。当路径具有宽度并且是称为走廊的二维对象(由一条状单元格表示)并且成本(每单位面积)以序数尺度测量时,情况就不是这样了。在本文中,我们提出了一个额外的模型,该模型表征了有序尺度栅格成本曲面上的最小成本走廊-或简称为最小有序尺度成本走廊-并表明它可以转化为一个多目标优化问题的实例,即具有字典顺序偏好关系的首选路径问题,并相应地求解。通过人工景观数据和实际数据的计算实验对模型进行了验证。结果表明,与传统的最低成本走廊相比,最小序数尺度成本走廊保证包含更小的高成本区域,而代价是更长的和蜿蜒的形式。在最坏情况下,最小有序尺度成本走廊问题的计算复杂度为0 (n 2.5),导致其计算时间比最小成本走廊问题长。然而,在实践中,这种差异较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A method for finding a least-cost corridor on an ordinal-scaled raster cost surface
ABSTRACT The least-cost path problem is a widely studied problems in geographic information science. In raster space, the problem is to find a path that accumulates the least amount of cost between two locations based on the assumptions that the path is a one-dimensional object (represented by a string of cells) and that the cost (per unit length) is measured on a quantitative scale. Efficient methods are available for solution of this problem when at least one of these assumptions is upheld. This is not the case when the path has a width and is a two-dimensional object called a corridor (represented by a swath of cells) and the cost (per unit area) is measured on an ordinal scale. In this paper, we propose one additional model that characterizes a least-cost corridor on an ordinal-scaled raster cost surface – or a least ordinal-scaled cost corridor for short – and show that it can be transformed into an instance of a multiobjective optimization problem known as the preferred path problem with a lexicographic preference relation and solved accordingly. The model is tested through computational experiments with artificial landscape data as well as real-world data. Results show that least ordinal-scaled cost corridors are guaranteed to contain smaller areas of higher cost than conventional least-cost corridors at the expense of more elongated and winding forms. The least ordinal-scaled cost corridor problem has computational complexity of O(n 2.5) in the worst case, resulting in a longer computational time than least-cost corridors. However, this difference is smaller in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Zero watermarking algorithm for BIM data based on distance partitioning and local feature Controlling for spatial confounding and spatial interference in causal inference: modelling insights from a computational experiment Application of GIS and fuzzy sets to small-scale site suitability assessment for extensive brackish water aquaculture Revealing intra-urban hierarchical spatial structure through representation learning by combining road network abstraction model and taxi trajectory data The time- and distance-decay effects of hurricane relevancy on social media: an empirical study of three hurricanes in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1