社论:《国际社会法律评论》第23期第4期

K. Allinson
{"title":"社论:《国际社会法律评论》第23期第4期","authors":"K. Allinson","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of the International Community Law Review considers the operation of international law across the land, sea and air; from access to rights for air passengers to the rights of those on the high seas. It ends with a novel consideration of the application of the prohibition of the use of force to issues of statehood and recognition. In Taking Air Passenger Rights Seriously: the Case Against the Exclusivity of the Montreal Convention, Nicolas Bernard considers the positions of the Montreal Convention, which unifies the rules relating to the liability of air carriers for damage or delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage and cargo. Bernard explores the ‘deleterious consequences on consumer protection of the exclusivity of the Montreal Convention’ in that it inherently favours industry interests at the expense of the consumer. In so doing, he makes the case for adopting a human rights-inspired, subsidiarity-based approach to passenger rights protection. Such an approach, recognises the complementary role of the international, regional and national levels in protecting consumers and enhancing flexibility. Moving from the air to the oceans, Gabriela Oanta’s contribution Access to Remedy in the European Union in Case of Breaches of Human Rights at Sea by Private Actors addresses the specific means of access to remedy that individuals have in the European Union (EU) in case of breaches of human rights at sea by private actors. In examining the role of both Member States and the EU, Oanta provides an original exploration of their responsibility in addressing some of the worst human rights violations which occur on the EU’s fishing vessels, from both a labour and human rights perspective. It addresses the competences of the EU, the remedial mechanism available to individuals subject to fishing-company-related human rights violations, and considers the possible future developments in the field.","PeriodicalId":43487,"journal":{"name":"International Community Law Review","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: International Community Law Review Issue 23:4\",\"authors\":\"K. Allinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18719732-12341481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue of the International Community Law Review considers the operation of international law across the land, sea and air; from access to rights for air passengers to the rights of those on the high seas. It ends with a novel consideration of the application of the prohibition of the use of force to issues of statehood and recognition. In Taking Air Passenger Rights Seriously: the Case Against the Exclusivity of the Montreal Convention, Nicolas Bernard considers the positions of the Montreal Convention, which unifies the rules relating to the liability of air carriers for damage or delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage and cargo. Bernard explores the ‘deleterious consequences on consumer protection of the exclusivity of the Montreal Convention’ in that it inherently favours industry interests at the expense of the consumer. In so doing, he makes the case for adopting a human rights-inspired, subsidiarity-based approach to passenger rights protection. Such an approach, recognises the complementary role of the international, regional and national levels in protecting consumers and enhancing flexibility. Moving from the air to the oceans, Gabriela Oanta’s contribution Access to Remedy in the European Union in Case of Breaches of Human Rights at Sea by Private Actors addresses the specific means of access to remedy that individuals have in the European Union (EU) in case of breaches of human rights at sea by private actors. In examining the role of both Member States and the EU, Oanta provides an original exploration of their responsibility in addressing some of the worst human rights violations which occur on the EU’s fishing vessels, from both a labour and human rights perspective. It addresses the competences of the EU, the remedial mechanism available to individuals subject to fishing-company-related human rights violations, and considers the possible future developments in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Community Law Review\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Community Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Community Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《国际社会法律评论》审议了国际法在陆地、海洋和空中的运作;从飞机乘客获得权利到公海上的权利。最后对禁止使用武力在国家地位和承认问题上的应用进行了新颖的思考。在《认真对待航空旅客权利:反对《蒙特利尔公约》排他性的案例》中,Nicolas Bernard考虑了《蒙特利尔公约》的立场,该公约统一了航空承运人对旅客、行李和货物在航空运输中的损害或延误的责任规则。伯纳德探讨了“蒙特利尔公约的排他性对消费者保护的有害后果”,因为它本质上是以牺牲消费者为代价来支持行业利益的。在这样做的过程中,他提出了采取一种以人权为灵感、以辅助为基础的方法来保护乘客权利的理由。这种方法承认国际、区域和国家各级在保护消费者和增强灵活性方面的互补作用。从空中到海洋,加布里埃拉·奥塔(Gabriela Oanta)的著作《在欧洲联盟,私人行为者在海上侵犯人权的情况下获得补救》探讨了个人在欧洲联盟(EU)遭遇私人行为者在海上侵犯人权时获得补救的具体途径。在审查成员国和欧盟的作用时,Oanta从劳工和人权的角度,对他们在解决欧盟渔船上发生的一些最严重的侵犯人权行为方面的责任进行了原始的探索。它讨论了欧盟的权限、受到与渔业公司有关的侵犯人权行为的个人可获得的补救机制,并考虑了该领域未来可能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: International Community Law Review Issue 23:4
This issue of the International Community Law Review considers the operation of international law across the land, sea and air; from access to rights for air passengers to the rights of those on the high seas. It ends with a novel consideration of the application of the prohibition of the use of force to issues of statehood and recognition. In Taking Air Passenger Rights Seriously: the Case Against the Exclusivity of the Montreal Convention, Nicolas Bernard considers the positions of the Montreal Convention, which unifies the rules relating to the liability of air carriers for damage or delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage and cargo. Bernard explores the ‘deleterious consequences on consumer protection of the exclusivity of the Montreal Convention’ in that it inherently favours industry interests at the expense of the consumer. In so doing, he makes the case for adopting a human rights-inspired, subsidiarity-based approach to passenger rights protection. Such an approach, recognises the complementary role of the international, regional and national levels in protecting consumers and enhancing flexibility. Moving from the air to the oceans, Gabriela Oanta’s contribution Access to Remedy in the European Union in Case of Breaches of Human Rights at Sea by Private Actors addresses the specific means of access to remedy that individuals have in the European Union (EU) in case of breaches of human rights at sea by private actors. In examining the role of both Member States and the EU, Oanta provides an original exploration of their responsibility in addressing some of the worst human rights violations which occur on the EU’s fishing vessels, from both a labour and human rights perspective. It addresses the competences of the EU, the remedial mechanism available to individuals subject to fishing-company-related human rights violations, and considers the possible future developments in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to explore the implications of various traditions of international law, as well as more current perceived hegemonic trends for the idea of an international community. The Journal will also look at the ways and means in which the international community uses and adapts international law to deal with new and emerging challenges. Non-state actors , intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations, individuals, peoples, transnational corporations and civil society as a whole - have changed our outlook on contemporary international law. In addition to States and intergovernmental organizations, they now play an important role.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Role of Fairness for the Sources of International Law The Imbalanced Geography of the Law on Use of Force in Self-Defence Government Recognition and the Dispute over the Venezuelan Gold Reserves in the Bank of England The Role of General Assembly Resolutions in the Identification of Customary International Law and the Chagos Archipelago Advisory Opinion An Indigenous Cosmovision for Earth-Centric Governance: Deconstructing the Normative Structure of International Law?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1