葡萄牙人饮食中对人造甜味剂的接触及其相关因素

Catarina Carvalho, D. Correia, M. Severo, V. Magalhães, S. Casal, E. Ramos, C. Lopes, D. Torres
{"title":"葡萄牙人饮食中对人造甜味剂的接触及其相关因素","authors":"Catarina Carvalho, D. Correia, M. Severo, V. Magalhães, S. Casal, E. Ramos, C. Lopes, D. Torres","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2022.2075039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the risk of the Portuguese population’s exposure to six non-nutritive intense sweeteners (NNIS) and their main associated factors. A tiered approach was used to estimate the usual exposure to the NNIS obtained from two 1-day food diaries among children and two 24-hour recalls among adults in the Portuguese national dietary survey (IAN-AF 2015–2016; age: 3–84 y; n = 5005). The tiers considered were the following: Tier 2.1 represents the most conservative tier, in which all foods reported were matched with the respective maximum permitted levels (MPLs); in Tier 2.2, the MPLs were attributed only to the foods for which the brand’s label information identified the presence of an added NNIS; finally, Tier 3 was identical to Tier 2.2, but analytical NNIS occurrence data were used, instead of MPLs. The usual exposure of the Portuguese population to each NNIS was very low in all tiers across all age groups, as was the estimated prevalence of exposure above the acceptable daily intake. Soft drinks were the main source of exposure for most sweeteners, and acesulfame K and aspartame were the most consumed NNIS. The odds of exposure to at least one NNIS were higher in more highly educated adults and elderly, obese elderly, women, and people with lower healthy diet scores. The estimated risk of exceeding the safety levels of NNIS intake was very low in all evaluated population groups, even when considering the most conservative approach.","PeriodicalId":12121,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","volume":"10 1","pages":"1206 - 1221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary exposure to artificial sweeteners and associated factors in the Portuguese population\",\"authors\":\"Catarina Carvalho, D. Correia, M. Severo, V. Magalhães, S. Casal, E. Ramos, C. Lopes, D. Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19440049.2022.2075039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the risk of the Portuguese population’s exposure to six non-nutritive intense sweeteners (NNIS) and their main associated factors. A tiered approach was used to estimate the usual exposure to the NNIS obtained from two 1-day food diaries among children and two 24-hour recalls among adults in the Portuguese national dietary survey (IAN-AF 2015–2016; age: 3–84 y; n = 5005). The tiers considered were the following: Tier 2.1 represents the most conservative tier, in which all foods reported were matched with the respective maximum permitted levels (MPLs); in Tier 2.2, the MPLs were attributed only to the foods for which the brand’s label information identified the presence of an added NNIS; finally, Tier 3 was identical to Tier 2.2, but analytical NNIS occurrence data were used, instead of MPLs. The usual exposure of the Portuguese population to each NNIS was very low in all tiers across all age groups, as was the estimated prevalence of exposure above the acceptable daily intake. Soft drinks were the main source of exposure for most sweeteners, and acesulfame K and aspartame were the most consumed NNIS. The odds of exposure to at least one NNIS were higher in more highly educated adults and elderly, obese elderly, women, and people with lower healthy diet scores. The estimated risk of exceeding the safety levels of NNIS intake was very low in all evaluated population groups, even when considering the most conservative approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1206 - 1221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2075039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2075039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究旨在评估葡萄牙人群暴露于六种非营养性强甜味剂(NNIS)的风险及其主要相关因素。在葡萄牙国家饮食调查(IAN-AF 2015-2016)中,采用分层方法来估计从儿童的两个1天食物日记和成人的两个24小时回忆中获得的NNIS通常暴露量。年龄:3-84岁;n = 5005)。考虑的级别如下:2.1级代表最保守的级别,其中所有报告的食品都符合各自的最大允许水平(MPLs);在第2.2层中,MPLs仅归因于品牌标签信息标识存在添加NNIS的食品;最后,第3层与第2.2层相同,但使用了分析性NNIS发生数据,而不是MPLs。在所有年龄组中,葡萄牙人口对每个NNIS的通常暴露量都很低,高于可接受日摄入量的暴露率估计也很低。软饮料是大多数甜味剂的主要暴露源,而安赛蜜K和阿斯巴甜是消耗最多的NNIS。在受教育程度较高的成年人、老年人、肥胖老年人、女性和健康饮食评分较低的人群中,接触至少一种NNIS的几率更高。在所有被评估的人群中,即使考虑到最保守的方法,超过NNIS摄入安全水平的估计风险也非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dietary exposure to artificial sweeteners and associated factors in the Portuguese population
Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the risk of the Portuguese population’s exposure to six non-nutritive intense sweeteners (NNIS) and their main associated factors. A tiered approach was used to estimate the usual exposure to the NNIS obtained from two 1-day food diaries among children and two 24-hour recalls among adults in the Portuguese national dietary survey (IAN-AF 2015–2016; age: 3–84 y; n = 5005). The tiers considered were the following: Tier 2.1 represents the most conservative tier, in which all foods reported were matched with the respective maximum permitted levels (MPLs); in Tier 2.2, the MPLs were attributed only to the foods for which the brand’s label information identified the presence of an added NNIS; finally, Tier 3 was identical to Tier 2.2, but analytical NNIS occurrence data were used, instead of MPLs. The usual exposure of the Portuguese population to each NNIS was very low in all tiers across all age groups, as was the estimated prevalence of exposure above the acceptable daily intake. Soft drinks were the main source of exposure for most sweeteners, and acesulfame K and aspartame were the most consumed NNIS. The odds of exposure to at least one NNIS were higher in more highly educated adults and elderly, obese elderly, women, and people with lower healthy diet scores. The estimated risk of exceeding the safety levels of NNIS intake was very low in all evaluated population groups, even when considering the most conservative approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infant nutrition at risk: a global systematic review of ochratoxin A in human breast milk-human health risk assessment. Determination and evaluation of canthaxanthin and β-apo-8'-carotenoid ethyl ester in chicken eggs and meat in Tianjin. A worldwide systematic review of ochratoxin A in various coffee products - human exposure and health risk assessment. Determination of azodicarbonamide in flour samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with xanthydrol pre-column derivatisation. Food process contaminants: formation, occurrence, risk assessment and mitigation strategies – a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1