RBFMOpt、NSGA2和MHACO在某办公楼热能源优化中的性能评价

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Journal of Building Performance Simulation Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.1080/19401493.2022.2143568
Mario Alves da Silva, Rafael de Paula Garcia, J. Carlo
{"title":"RBFMOpt、NSGA2和MHACO在某办公楼热能源优化中的性能评价","authors":"Mario Alves da Silva, Rafael de Paula Garcia, J. Carlo","doi":"10.1080/19401493.2022.2143568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation-based Optimization processes (SBO) can be valuable methods in searching for efficient buildings. This study evaluates the performance of the multi-objective algorithms RBFMOpt, NSGA2, and MHACO facing the same SBO problem. The goal is to maximize thermal comfort while minimizing the energy consumption with HVAC systems for a typical Brazilian office building. We proposed a scoring method based on four algorithms’ performance metrics: hypervolume, variability, IGD+, and coverage. We also applied a Kruskal–Wallis test to determine whether the SBO process needs multiple runs to obtain the average performance of each algorithm. The results show that RBFMOpt presents the best performance, reaching a higher score, especially in situations with low budgets for the simulation and optimization process. The results also pointed out that the number of cycles for RBFMOpt impacts directly the quality of solutions, and a higher number of cycles provided better results.","PeriodicalId":49168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Building Performance Simulation","volume":"16 1","pages":"366 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance assessment of RBFMOpt, NSGA2, and MHACO on the thermal and energy optimization of an office building\",\"authors\":\"Mario Alves da Silva, Rafael de Paula Garcia, J. Carlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19401493.2022.2143568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Simulation-based Optimization processes (SBO) can be valuable methods in searching for efficient buildings. This study evaluates the performance of the multi-objective algorithms RBFMOpt, NSGA2, and MHACO facing the same SBO problem. The goal is to maximize thermal comfort while minimizing the energy consumption with HVAC systems for a typical Brazilian office building. We proposed a scoring method based on four algorithms’ performance metrics: hypervolume, variability, IGD+, and coverage. We also applied a Kruskal–Wallis test to determine whether the SBO process needs multiple runs to obtain the average performance of each algorithm. The results show that RBFMOpt presents the best performance, reaching a higher score, especially in situations with low budgets for the simulation and optimization process. The results also pointed out that the number of cycles for RBFMOpt impacts directly the quality of solutions, and a higher number of cycles provided better results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Building Performance Simulation\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"366 - 380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Building Performance Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2143568\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Building Performance Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2143568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于仿真的优化过程(SBO)是寻找高效建筑的一种有价值的方法。本研究评估了面对相同SBO问题的多目标算法RBFMOpt、NSGA2和MHACO的性能。目标是最大限度地提高热舒适性,同时最大限度地减少典型巴西办公大楼的暖通空调系统的能耗。我们提出了一种基于四种算法性能指标的评分方法:hypervolume, variability, IGD+和coverage。我们还应用了Kruskal-Wallis测试来确定SBO过程是否需要多次运行才能获得每个算法的平均性能。结果表明,RBFMOpt在仿真和优化过程预算较低的情况下表现出最好的性能,获得了较高的分数。结果还指出,RBFMOpt的循环次数直接影响溶液的质量,循环次数越多,效果越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance assessment of RBFMOpt, NSGA2, and MHACO on the thermal and energy optimization of an office building
Simulation-based Optimization processes (SBO) can be valuable methods in searching for efficient buildings. This study evaluates the performance of the multi-objective algorithms RBFMOpt, NSGA2, and MHACO facing the same SBO problem. The goal is to maximize thermal comfort while minimizing the energy consumption with HVAC systems for a typical Brazilian office building. We proposed a scoring method based on four algorithms’ performance metrics: hypervolume, variability, IGD+, and coverage. We also applied a Kruskal–Wallis test to determine whether the SBO process needs multiple runs to obtain the average performance of each algorithm. The results show that RBFMOpt presents the best performance, reaching a higher score, especially in situations with low budgets for the simulation and optimization process. The results also pointed out that the number of cycles for RBFMOpt impacts directly the quality of solutions, and a higher number of cycles provided better results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Building Performance Simulation
Journal of Building Performance Simulation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Performance Simulation (JBPS) aims to make a substantial and lasting contribution to the international building community by supporting our authors and the high-quality, original research they submit. The journal also offers a forum for original review papers and researched case studies We welcome building performance simulation contributions that explore the following topics related to buildings and communities: -Theoretical aspects related to modelling and simulating the physical processes (thermal, air flow, moisture, lighting, acoustics). -Theoretical aspects related to modelling and simulating conventional and innovative energy conversion, storage, distribution, and control systems. -Theoretical aspects related to occupants, weather data, and other boundary conditions. -Methods and algorithms for optimizing the performance of buildings and communities and the systems which service them, including interaction with the electrical grid. -Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis, and calibration. -Methods and algorithms for validating models and for verifying solution methods and tools. -Development and validation of controls-oriented models that are appropriate for model predictive control and/or automated fault detection and diagnostics. -Techniques for educating and training tool users. -Software development techniques and interoperability issues with direct applicability to building performance simulation. -Case studies involving the application of building performance simulation for any stage of the design, construction, commissioning, operation, or management of buildings and the systems which service them are welcomed if they include validation or aspects that make a novel contribution to the knowledge base.
期刊最新文献
Comparing overheating risk and mitigation strategies for two Canadian schools by using building simulation calibrated with measured data Using Fourier series to obtain cross periodic wall response factors Limitations and issues of conventional artificial neural network-based surrogate models for building energy retrofit An empirical review of methods to assess overheating in buildings in the context of changes to extreme heat events Coupling BIM and detailed modelica simulations of HVAC systems in a common data environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1