抗sa抗体和异质核核糖核蛋白K抗体在类风湿关节炎中的诊断价值

M. V. Volkova, A. Kunder, D. Roggenbuck
{"title":"抗sa抗体和异质核核糖核蛋白K抗体在类风湿关节炎中的诊断价值","authors":"M. V. Volkova, A. Kunder, D. Roggenbuck","doi":"10.20333/2500136-2020-6-57-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation The aim of the research is to determine the levels and frequency of antibodies popularity to cyclic citrullinated peptide (APCCP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (anti-gRNP K) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics, and also to determine sensitivity and specificity of anti-Sa antibodies, anti-hRNP K in seronegative RA. Material and methods. The study included 270 patients with RA and 50 healthy individuals. The levels of ACCP, anti-Sa, anti-hRNP K were assessed in blood serum samples from patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using commercial test systems. RF levels were assessed by kinetic nephelometry on automatic analyzer. Results. The levels and popularity frequency of the studied antibodies in patients with RА were significantly higher than in healthy individuals (p <0.05). Tests based on ADCP detection had the highest indices of sensitivity and specificity for RA diagnosis; sensitivity - 78.01%, specificity - 100.00%, and RF - 70.64%, specificity 96.97%. In case of serogegative APCCP and RA RF, diagnostic sensitivity of anti-Sa antibodies determination was 50.00%, specificity was 96.77%, sensitivity of anti-hRNP K antibodies determination was 55.56%, and specificity was 100.00%. Conclusion. Considering high specificity of tests for anti-Sa and anti-hRNP K antibodies in seronegative RA, they can be considered as additional confirmatory diagnostic tests.","PeriodicalId":17054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","volume":"54 1","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of anti-SA antibodies and antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K in rheumatoid arthritis\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Volkova, A. Kunder, D. Roggenbuck\",\"doi\":\"10.20333/2500136-2020-6-57-63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Annotation The aim of the research is to determine the levels and frequency of antibodies popularity to cyclic citrullinated peptide (APCCP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (anti-gRNP K) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics, and also to determine sensitivity and specificity of anti-Sa antibodies, anti-hRNP K in seronegative RA. Material and methods. The study included 270 patients with RA and 50 healthy individuals. The levels of ACCP, anti-Sa, anti-hRNP K were assessed in blood serum samples from patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using commercial test systems. RF levels were assessed by kinetic nephelometry on automatic analyzer. Results. The levels and popularity frequency of the studied antibodies in patients with RА were significantly higher than in healthy individuals (p <0.05). Tests based on ADCP detection had the highest indices of sensitivity and specificity for RA diagnosis; sensitivity - 78.01%, specificity - 100.00%, and RF - 70.64%, specificity 96.97%. In case of serogegative APCCP and RA RF, diagnostic sensitivity of anti-Sa antibodies determination was 50.00%, specificity was 96.77%, sensitivity of anti-hRNP K antibodies determination was 55.56%, and specificity was 100.00%. Conclusion. Considering high specificity of tests for anti-Sa and anti-hRNP K antibodies in seronegative RA, they can be considered as additional confirmatory diagnostic tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20333/2500136-2020-6-57-63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20333/2500136-2020-6-57-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定类风湿关节炎(RA)中环瓜氨酸肽(APCCP)、类风湿因子(RF)、抗sa抗体和异质核核糖核蛋白K抗体(抗grnp K)流行抗体的水平和频率,比较其诊断特征,并确定血清阴性RA中抗sa抗体、抗hrnp K抗体的敏感性和特异性。材料和方法。该研究包括270名RA患者和50名健康人。采用商用检测系统,采用酶联免疫吸附法检测患者血清中ACCP、抗sa、抗hrnp K水平。在自动分析仪上用动态浊度法测定射频水平。结果。RА患者的抗体水平和流行频率均显著高于健康人群(p <0.05)。基于ADCP检测的试验诊断RA的敏感性和特异性指标最高;灵敏度为78.01%,特异性为100.00%,RF为70.64%,特异性为96.97%。在APCCP和RA RF血清阴性的情况下,抗sa抗体检测的诊断敏感性为50.00%,特异性为96.77%,抗hrnp K抗体检测的敏感性为55.56%,特异性为100.00%。结论。考虑到血清阴性RA的抗sa和抗hrnp K抗体检测的高特异性,可以考虑将其作为额外的确证性诊断检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic value of anti-SA antibodies and antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K in rheumatoid arthritis
Annotation The aim of the research is to determine the levels and frequency of antibodies popularity to cyclic citrullinated peptide (APCCP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-Sa antibodies and antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (anti-gRNP K) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics, and also to determine sensitivity and specificity of anti-Sa antibodies, anti-hRNP K in seronegative RA. Material and methods. The study included 270 patients with RA and 50 healthy individuals. The levels of ACCP, anti-Sa, anti-hRNP K were assessed in blood serum samples from patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using commercial test systems. RF levels were assessed by kinetic nephelometry on automatic analyzer. Results. The levels and popularity frequency of the studied antibodies in patients with RА were significantly higher than in healthy individuals (p <0.05). Tests based on ADCP detection had the highest indices of sensitivity and specificity for RA diagnosis; sensitivity - 78.01%, specificity - 100.00%, and RF - 70.64%, specificity 96.97%. In case of serogegative APCCP and RA RF, diagnostic sensitivity of anti-Sa antibodies determination was 50.00%, specificity was 96.77%, sensitivity of anti-hRNP K antibodies determination was 55.56%, and specificity was 100.00%. Conclusion. Considering high specificity of tests for anti-Sa and anti-hRNP K antibodies in seronegative RA, they can be considered as additional confirmatory diagnostic tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊最新文献
Principles of Strategy: A Practice-Based View No Risk - More Fun? The Influence of Shopping Companions on Adolescents' Risk Perception and Hedonism Antecedents of Frontline Employees' Customer Orientation: A Comprehensive Review Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives The Effects of Technology Affinity, Prior Customer Journey Experience, and Brand Familiarity on the Acceptance of Smart Service Innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1