L. Tariciotti, Davide Ferlito, V. Caccavella, Andrea Di Cristofori, G. Fiore, L.G. Remore, M. Giordano, G. Remoli, G. Bertani, S. Borsa, M. Pluderi, P. Remida, G. Basso, C. Giussani, M. Locatelli, G. Carrabba
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤、脑转移和原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤术前分化的深度学习模型:一项外部验证研究","authors":"L. Tariciotti, Davide Ferlito, V. Caccavella, Andrea Di Cristofori, G. Fiore, L.G. Remore, M. Giordano, G. Remoli, G. Bertani, S. Borsa, M. Pluderi, P. Remida, G. Basso, C. Giussani, M. Locatelli, G. Carrabba","doi":"10.3390/neurosci4010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) Background: Neuroimaging differentiation of glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and solitary brain metastasis (BM) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in neurosurgical practice, expanding the burden of care and exposing patients to additional risks related to further invasive procedures and treatment delays. In addition, atypical cases and overlapping features have not been entirely addressed by modern diagnostic research. The aim of this study was to validate a previously designed and internally validated ResNet101 deep learning model to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs. (2) Methods: We enrolled 126 patients (glioblastoma: n = 64; PCNSL: n = 27; BM: n = 35) with preoperative T1Gd-MRI scans and histopathological confirmation. Each lesion was segmented, and all regions of interest were exported in a DICOM dataset. A pre-trained ResNet101 deep neural network model implemented in a previous work on 121 patients was externally validated on the current cohort to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs on T1Gd-MRI scans. (3) Results: The model achieved optimal classification performance in distinguishing PCNSLs (AUC: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.62–0.85), glioblastomas (AUC: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.71–0.87) and moderate to low ability in differentiating BMs (AUC: 0.63; 95%CI: 0.52–0.76). The performance of expert neuro-radiologists on conventional plus advanced MR imaging, assessed by retrospectively reviewing the diagnostic reports of the selected cohort of patients, was found superior in accuracy for BMs (89.69%) and not inferior for PCNSL (82.90%) and glioblastomas (84.09%). (4) Conclusions: We investigated whether the previously published deep learning model was generalizable to an external population recruited at a different institution—this validation confirmed the consistency of the model and laid the groundwork for future clinical applications in brain tumour classification. This artificial intelligence-based model might represent a valuable educational resource and, if largely replicated on prospective data, help physicians differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSL and solitary BMs, especially in settings with limited resources.","PeriodicalId":74294,"journal":{"name":"NeuroSci","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Glioblastoma, Brain Metastasis, and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: An External Validation Study\",\"authors\":\"L. Tariciotti, Davide Ferlito, V. Caccavella, Andrea Di Cristofori, G. Fiore, L.G. Remore, M. Giordano, G. Remoli, G. Bertani, S. Borsa, M. Pluderi, P. Remida, G. Basso, C. Giussani, M. Locatelli, G. Carrabba\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurosci4010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(1) Background: Neuroimaging differentiation of glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and solitary brain metastasis (BM) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in neurosurgical practice, expanding the burden of care and exposing patients to additional risks related to further invasive procedures and treatment delays. In addition, atypical cases and overlapping features have not been entirely addressed by modern diagnostic research. The aim of this study was to validate a previously designed and internally validated ResNet101 deep learning model to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs. (2) Methods: We enrolled 126 patients (glioblastoma: n = 64; PCNSL: n = 27; BM: n = 35) with preoperative T1Gd-MRI scans and histopathological confirmation. Each lesion was segmented, and all regions of interest were exported in a DICOM dataset. A pre-trained ResNet101 deep neural network model implemented in a previous work on 121 patients was externally validated on the current cohort to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs on T1Gd-MRI scans. (3) Results: The model achieved optimal classification performance in distinguishing PCNSLs (AUC: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.62–0.85), glioblastomas (AUC: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.71–0.87) and moderate to low ability in differentiating BMs (AUC: 0.63; 95%CI: 0.52–0.76). The performance of expert neuro-radiologists on conventional plus advanced MR imaging, assessed by retrospectively reviewing the diagnostic reports of the selected cohort of patients, was found superior in accuracy for BMs (89.69%) and not inferior for PCNSL (82.90%) and glioblastomas (84.09%). (4) Conclusions: We investigated whether the previously published deep learning model was generalizable to an external population recruited at a different institution—this validation confirmed the consistency of the model and laid the groundwork for future clinical applications in brain tumour classification. This artificial intelligence-based model might represent a valuable educational resource and, if largely replicated on prospective data, help physicians differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSL and solitary BMs, especially in settings with limited resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroSci\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci4010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci4010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
(1)背景:胶质母细胞瘤、原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)和孤立性脑转移(BM)的神经影像学鉴别是神经外科实践中的一个诊断和治疗挑战,它扩大了护理负担,并使患者面临与进一步侵入性手术和治疗延误相关的额外风险。此外,非典型病例和重叠特征尚未完全解决现代诊断研究。本研究的目的是验证先前设计和内部验证的ResNet101深度学习模型,以区分胶质母细胞瘤、PCNSLs和脑转移。(2)方法:126例患者(胶质母细胞瘤:n = 64;PCNSL: n = 27;BM: n = 35)术前T1Gd-MRI扫描和组织病理学证实。每个病变被分割,所有感兴趣的区域被导出到DICOM数据集中。先前在121例患者中实施的预训练的ResNet101深度神经网络模型在当前队列中进行了外部验证,以在T1Gd-MRI扫描上区分胶质母细胞瘤、PCNSLs和脑转移。(3)结果:该模型对pcnsl的分类效果最佳(AUC: 0.73;95%CI: 0.62-0.85),胶质母细胞瘤(AUC: 0.78;95%CI: 0.71-0.87)和中至低度脑转移鉴别能力(AUC: 0.63;95%置信区间:0.52—-0.76)。通过回顾性评估选定队列患者的诊断报告,神经放射科专家在常规和高级磁共振成像方面的表现,发现脑转移瘤(89.69%)的准确性更高,PCNSL(82.90%)和胶质母细胞瘤(84.09%)的准确性也不低。(4)结论:我们研究了之前发表的深度学习模型是否可以推广到不同机构招募的外部人群,这一验证证实了模型的一致性,为未来在脑肿瘤分类中的临床应用奠定了基础。这种基于人工智能的模型可能是一种有价值的教育资源,如果在前瞻性数据上大量复制,可以帮助医生区分胶质母细胞瘤、PCNSL和孤立性脑转移,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
A Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Glioblastoma, Brain Metastasis, and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: An External Validation Study
(1) Background: Neuroimaging differentiation of glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and solitary brain metastasis (BM) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in neurosurgical practice, expanding the burden of care and exposing patients to additional risks related to further invasive procedures and treatment delays. In addition, atypical cases and overlapping features have not been entirely addressed by modern diagnostic research. The aim of this study was to validate a previously designed and internally validated ResNet101 deep learning model to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs. (2) Methods: We enrolled 126 patients (glioblastoma: n = 64; PCNSL: n = 27; BM: n = 35) with preoperative T1Gd-MRI scans and histopathological confirmation. Each lesion was segmented, and all regions of interest were exported in a DICOM dataset. A pre-trained ResNet101 deep neural network model implemented in a previous work on 121 patients was externally validated on the current cohort to differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSLs and BMs on T1Gd-MRI scans. (3) Results: The model achieved optimal classification performance in distinguishing PCNSLs (AUC: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.62–0.85), glioblastomas (AUC: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.71–0.87) and moderate to low ability in differentiating BMs (AUC: 0.63; 95%CI: 0.52–0.76). The performance of expert neuro-radiologists on conventional plus advanced MR imaging, assessed by retrospectively reviewing the diagnostic reports of the selected cohort of patients, was found superior in accuracy for BMs (89.69%) and not inferior for PCNSL (82.90%) and glioblastomas (84.09%). (4) Conclusions: We investigated whether the previously published deep learning model was generalizable to an external population recruited at a different institution—this validation confirmed the consistency of the model and laid the groundwork for future clinical applications in brain tumour classification. This artificial intelligence-based model might represent a valuable educational resource and, if largely replicated on prospective data, help physicians differentiate glioblastomas, PCNSL and solitary BMs, especially in settings with limited resources.