伪不变目标地表温度反演的分窗与单通道算法对比分析

IF 0.5 Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas Pub Date : 2020-08-27 DOI:10.1590/s1982-21702020000200008
P. Käfer, S. Rolim, L. R. Diaz, Nájila Souza da Rocha, M. Iglesias, F. Rex
{"title":"伪不变目标地表温度反演的分窗与单通道算法对比分析","authors":"P. Käfer, S. Rolim, L. R. Diaz, Nájila Souza da Rocha, M. Iglesias, F. Rex","doi":"10.1590/s1982-21702020000200008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land surface temperature (LST) acquired from remote sensing observations is essential to monitor surface energy and water exchange processes at the land-atmosphere interface. Most LST retrieval methodologies are developed focusing on Northern hemisphere. Consequently, Southern hemisphere has a great need for investigating the performance of LST retrieval algorithms already consolidated in the literature. In this paper, we compared a Splitwindow (SW) and a Single-channel (SC) method to retrieve LST from Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS images in a dune field, Southern Brazil. To validate the results, the Atmospheric Correction Parameter Calculator (ACPC) tool and Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) were used. Results demonstrated that both methodologies are in accordance with the RTE, despite they overestimated the LST. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the means are not statistically significant (0.05 level). The correlations between LST retrieved and RTE were strong, producing R² of 0.984 and 0.973 for the SW and SC, respectively, and RMSE values of 1.18 and 1.6. SW also exhibited the best values of MSD (±0.983) and Bias (0.773), thus reinforcing its superior performance. SW can be applied with an accuracy of 1.18 K in Southern Brazil, without needing complex modeling or specific radiosonde.","PeriodicalId":55347,"journal":{"name":"Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPLIT-WINDOW AND SINGLE-CHANNEL ALGORITHMS FOR LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE RETRIEVAL OF A PSEUDO-INVARIANT TARGET\",\"authors\":\"P. Käfer, S. Rolim, L. R. Diaz, Nájila Souza da Rocha, M. Iglesias, F. Rex\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1982-21702020000200008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Land surface temperature (LST) acquired from remote sensing observations is essential to monitor surface energy and water exchange processes at the land-atmosphere interface. Most LST retrieval methodologies are developed focusing on Northern hemisphere. Consequently, Southern hemisphere has a great need for investigating the performance of LST retrieval algorithms already consolidated in the literature. In this paper, we compared a Splitwindow (SW) and a Single-channel (SC) method to retrieve LST from Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS images in a dune field, Southern Brazil. To validate the results, the Atmospheric Correction Parameter Calculator (ACPC) tool and Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) were used. Results demonstrated that both methodologies are in accordance with the RTE, despite they overestimated the LST. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the means are not statistically significant (0.05 level). The correlations between LST retrieved and RTE were strong, producing R² of 0.984 and 0.973 for the SW and SC, respectively, and RMSE values of 1.18 and 1.6. SW also exhibited the best values of MSD (±0.983) and Bias (0.773), thus reinforcing its superior performance. SW can be applied with an accuracy of 1.18 K in Southern Brazil, without needing complex modeling or specific radiosonde.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702020000200008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702020000200008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

遥感观测获得的地表温度对于监测陆地-大气界面的地表能量和水交换过程至关重要。大多数地表温度反演方法都是针对北半球开发的。因此,南半球非常需要研究文献中已经巩固的LST检索算法的性能。在本文中,我们比较了Splitwindow (SW)和Single-channel (SC)方法从巴西南部沙丘地区的Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS图像中检索地表温度。为了验证结果,使用了大气校正参数计算器(ACPC)工具和辐射传递方程(RTE)。结果表明,尽管两种方法都高估了LST,但都符合RTE。方差分析(ANOVA)表明,平均值无统计学意义(0.05水平)。LST与RTE的相关性较强,SW和SC的R²分别为0.984和0.973,RMSE分别为1.18和1.6。SW的MSD(±0.983)和Bias(0.773)也表现出最佳值,从而进一步增强了其优越的性能。SW在巴西南部的应用精度可达1.18 K,无需复杂的建模或特定的无线电探空仪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPLIT-WINDOW AND SINGLE-CHANNEL ALGORITHMS FOR LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE RETRIEVAL OF A PSEUDO-INVARIANT TARGET
Land surface temperature (LST) acquired from remote sensing observations is essential to monitor surface energy and water exchange processes at the land-atmosphere interface. Most LST retrieval methodologies are developed focusing on Northern hemisphere. Consequently, Southern hemisphere has a great need for investigating the performance of LST retrieval algorithms already consolidated in the literature. In this paper, we compared a Splitwindow (SW) and a Single-channel (SC) method to retrieve LST from Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS images in a dune field, Southern Brazil. To validate the results, the Atmospheric Correction Parameter Calculator (ACPC) tool and Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) were used. Results demonstrated that both methodologies are in accordance with the RTE, despite they overestimated the LST. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the means are not statistically significant (0.05 level). The correlations between LST retrieved and RTE were strong, producing R² of 0.984 and 0.973 for the SW and SC, respectively, and RMSE values of 1.18 and 1.6. SW also exhibited the best values of MSD (±0.983) and Bias (0.773), thus reinforcing its superior performance. SW can be applied with an accuracy of 1.18 K in Southern Brazil, without needing complex modeling or specific radiosonde.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas
Boletim De Ciencias Geodesicas Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas publishes original papers in the area of Geodetic Sciences and correlated ones (Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems). Submitted articles must be unpublished, and should not be under consideration for publication in any other journal. Previous publication of the paper in conference proceedings would not violate the originality requirements. Articles must be written preferably in English language.
期刊最新文献
Spatial and seasonal dynamics of rainfall in subtropical Brazil Exploring spatio-temporal patterns of OpenStreetMap (OSM) contributions in heterogeneous urban areas Harmonizing income classes from 2000 and 2010 Brazilian censuses Study of the geometry influence of the support points in coordonates transformation: application from WGS84 to NS59 datum Speckle reduction for Sentinel-1A SAR images in the Semi-arid caatinga region, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1