为什么没有伟大的艺术图书馆?

IF 0.2 0 ART Art Documentation Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1086/716734
Janna Singer-Baefsky
{"title":"为什么没有伟大的艺术图书馆?","authors":"Janna Singer-Baefsky","doi":"10.1086/716734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past year, there has been a global reckoning with systemic racism, misogyny, transphobia, and xenophobia. As institutions look inward at the ways they can dismantle ongoing systems of oppression, academia must also look at how it codifies these ideologies through Eurocentric canons. Art history is one such field. However, as a highly interdisciplinary subject, it presents a unique foundation on which to restructure these frameworks. This article dissects the role that cataloging plays in reinforcing the canon within art libraries and how a radical cataloging approach can diversify research and representation within art history as a field. [This article is a revision of a paper presented at the “New Voices in the Profession” session during the 49th annual ARLIS/NA conference held virtually May 11–13, 2021.]","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"22 1 1","pages":"179 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Have There Been No Great Art Libraries:\",\"authors\":\"Janna Singer-Baefsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/716734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the past year, there has been a global reckoning with systemic racism, misogyny, transphobia, and xenophobia. As institutions look inward at the ways they can dismantle ongoing systems of oppression, academia must also look at how it codifies these ideologies through Eurocentric canons. Art history is one such field. However, as a highly interdisciplinary subject, it presents a unique foundation on which to restructure these frameworks. This article dissects the role that cataloging plays in reinforcing the canon within art libraries and how a radical cataloging approach can diversify research and representation within art history as a field. [This article is a revision of a paper presented at the “New Voices in the Profession” session during the 49th annual ARLIS/NA conference held virtually May 11–13, 2021.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":43009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Documentation\",\"volume\":\"22 1 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/716734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在过去的一年里,全球对系统性的种族主义、厌女症、变性恐惧症和仇外心理进行了清算。随着各机构向内审视如何拆除持续存在的压迫体系,学术界也必须审视如何通过以欧洲为中心的规范将这些意识形态编纂成法律。艺术史就是这样一个领域。然而,作为一门高度跨学科的学科,它为重新构建这些框架提供了独特的基础。本文剖析了编目在加强艺术图书馆的经典方面所起的作用,以及激进的编目方法如何使艺术史作为一个领域的研究和表现多样化。[本文是在2021年5月11日至13日举行的第49届ARLIS/NA年度会议“专业新声音”会议上发表的一篇论文的修订版。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Have There Been No Great Art Libraries:
During the past year, there has been a global reckoning with systemic racism, misogyny, transphobia, and xenophobia. As institutions look inward at the ways they can dismantle ongoing systems of oppression, academia must also look at how it codifies these ideologies through Eurocentric canons. Art history is one such field. However, as a highly interdisciplinary subject, it presents a unique foundation on which to restructure these frameworks. This article dissects the role that cataloging plays in reinforcing the canon within art libraries and how a radical cataloging approach can diversify research and representation within art history as a field. [This article is a revision of a paper presented at the “New Voices in the Profession” session during the 49th annual ARLIS/NA conference held virtually May 11–13, 2021.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Medhat-Lecocq, Héba (2021) : Terminologie comparée et traduction. Approche interdisciplinaire. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 260 p. Tao, Li and Kaibao, Hu (2021): Reappraising Self and Others: A Corpus-Based Study of Chinese Political Discourse in English Translation. Singapore: Springer, 194 p. Hartmann, Esa et Hersant, Patrick, dir. (2019) : Au miroir de la traduction. Avant-texte, intratexte, paratexte. Multilinguisme. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 228 p. Caliendo, Giuditta et Oster, Corinne (2020) : Traduire la criminalité : Perspectives traductologiques et discursives. Lille : Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 260 p. Pajević, Marko (2019): The Henri Meschonnic Reader: A Poetics of Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 320 p.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1