一小时内适当抗生素对患者预后的影响:一项研究和综述

S. Biswas
{"title":"一小时内适当抗生素对患者预后的影响:一项研究和综述","authors":"S. Biswas","doi":"10.58489/2836-5828/005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rapid initiation of antibiotic treatment is considered crucial in patients with severe infections such as septic shock & bacterial meningitis. The initiation of treatment with inappropriate antimicrobial agents (in relation to the subsequently demonstrated sensitivity of the pathogen) as the initial empiric therapy may be the single most common cause of prolonged delays in the introduction of effective therapy. Only in 5% of cases were antibiotics administered within 1 hr of the decision making, in 47% of cases it took 1–2 hrs. Only in 33% of cases antibiotics were prescribed within one hour of decision making. In 95% of cases antibiotics were administered within one hour of prescription. Sepsis is the main cause of death in patients treated in intensive care units (ICU). Current sepsis guidelines recommend administration of antibiotics within one hour of ED triage. However, the quality of supporting evidence is moderate & studied have shown mixed results regarding the association between antibiotics administration timing & outcome in septic shock. Objective:The aim of this study was to assess whether timing of administration of appropriate antibiotics within one hour of admission to the ICU impact patient outcomes. Method: Timing of ICU admission noted from the patient’s ICU nursing chart when the first vital parameters are noted by the nurse. Timing of administration of 1st dose of antibiotic and antibiotic that is administered within the first one hour of admission is noted from ICU nursing chart (in minutes from the timing of ICU admission). Appropriateness of antibiotic is assessed from the microbiology culture and sensitivity result. Outcome measures is noted from the ICU database. Data is then recorded systemically in the data collection form and finally entered in the excel sheet for analysis. All the data is then analysed by statistician by appropriate statistical tests. Result: A total of 53 patients, including 63.2% in the sepsis group and 53.4% in the septic shock group received antibiotics within the first hour. 87.5 % patients who received antibiotic within one hour of admission were discharged compared to 81.0% patients who received first dose of antibiotic beyond one hour of admission. The commonest gram-negative organisms were E. coli and Klebsiella in both groups. The commonest antibiotic administered was Meropenem in both groups. All patients who received appropriate antibiotic were discharged compared with only 69.2% patients discharged whose antibiotic choice was inappropriate. Mortality was 30.8% in the group whose initial antibiotic choice was inappropriate while no patients died in the group where the patient received appropriate empirical therapy. Conclusion: In my study it is demonstrated that gram-negative bacteria remain the major pathogen in sepsis as has been demonstrated in most ICUs in India. When appropriateness as well as timing of administration were compared simultaneously, all patients who received appropriate antibiotic within one hour or more than one hour survived to discharge. However, if antibiotic choice was inappropriate, 25% patients died even if they received the antibiotics within one hour and if the first dose was delayed beyond the first hour, the mortality further increased to 40%. There was no significant difference in the mean of ICU length of stay and mean hospital length of stay of patients based on appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy.","PeriodicalId":72287,"journal":{"name":"Archives of nephrology and urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Appropriate Antibiotics within One Hour and Patients' Outcome: A Study and Review\",\"authors\":\"S. Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.58489/2836-5828/005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Rapid initiation of antibiotic treatment is considered crucial in patients with severe infections such as septic shock & bacterial meningitis. The initiation of treatment with inappropriate antimicrobial agents (in relation to the subsequently demonstrated sensitivity of the pathogen) as the initial empiric therapy may be the single most common cause of prolonged delays in the introduction of effective therapy. Only in 5% of cases were antibiotics administered within 1 hr of the decision making, in 47% of cases it took 1–2 hrs. Only in 33% of cases antibiotics were prescribed within one hour of decision making. In 95% of cases antibiotics were administered within one hour of prescription. Sepsis is the main cause of death in patients treated in intensive care units (ICU). Current sepsis guidelines recommend administration of antibiotics within one hour of ED triage. However, the quality of supporting evidence is moderate & studied have shown mixed results regarding the association between antibiotics administration timing & outcome in septic shock. Objective:The aim of this study was to assess whether timing of administration of appropriate antibiotics within one hour of admission to the ICU impact patient outcomes. Method: Timing of ICU admission noted from the patient’s ICU nursing chart when the first vital parameters are noted by the nurse. Timing of administration of 1st dose of antibiotic and antibiotic that is administered within the first one hour of admission is noted from ICU nursing chart (in minutes from the timing of ICU admission). Appropriateness of antibiotic is assessed from the microbiology culture and sensitivity result. Outcome measures is noted from the ICU database. Data is then recorded systemically in the data collection form and finally entered in the excel sheet for analysis. All the data is then analysed by statistician by appropriate statistical tests. Result: A total of 53 patients, including 63.2% in the sepsis group and 53.4% in the septic shock group received antibiotics within the first hour. 87.5 % patients who received antibiotic within one hour of admission were discharged compared to 81.0% patients who received first dose of antibiotic beyond one hour of admission. The commonest gram-negative organisms were E. coli and Klebsiella in both groups. The commonest antibiotic administered was Meropenem in both groups. All patients who received appropriate antibiotic were discharged compared with only 69.2% patients discharged whose antibiotic choice was inappropriate. Mortality was 30.8% in the group whose initial antibiotic choice was inappropriate while no patients died in the group where the patient received appropriate empirical therapy. Conclusion: In my study it is demonstrated that gram-negative bacteria remain the major pathogen in sepsis as has been demonstrated in most ICUs in India. When appropriateness as well as timing of administration were compared simultaneously, all patients who received appropriate antibiotic within one hour or more than one hour survived to discharge. However, if antibiotic choice was inappropriate, 25% patients died even if they received the antibiotics within one hour and if the first dose was delayed beyond the first hour, the mortality further increased to 40%. There was no significant difference in the mean of ICU length of stay and mean hospital length of stay of patients based on appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of nephrology and urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of nephrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58489/2836-5828/005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58489/2836-5828/005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在脓毒性休克和细菌性脑膜炎等严重感染患者中,迅速开始抗生素治疗被认为是至关重要的。开始使用不适当的抗菌剂(与随后证明的病原体敏感性有关)作为最初的经验性治疗可能是引入有效治疗的长期延误的最常见原因。只有5%的病例在决策后1小时内给予抗生素,47%的病例需要1 - 2小时。只有33%的病例在决策后一小时内开了抗生素。95%的病例在处方后一小时内使用抗生素。脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡的主要原因。目前的败血症指南建议在急诊科分诊后一小时内使用抗生素。然而,支持证据的质量是中等的,研究表明,关于抗生素给药时机与感染性休克结局之间的关系,结果好坏参半。目的:本研究的目的是评估在ICU入院一小时内给予适当抗生素的时机是否会影响患者的预后。方法:当护士记录第一个重要参数时,从患者的ICU护理表中记录ICU入院时间。第一剂抗生素的给药时间和入院后一小时内给药的抗生素的给药时间在ICU护理表中注明(从ICU入院时间算起,以分钟为单位)。从微生物培养和药敏结果评价抗生素的适宜性。结果指标从ICU数据库中记录。然后将数据系统地记录在数据收集表中,最后输入到excel表格中进行分析。然后统计学家通过适当的统计检验对所有数据进行分析。结果:53例患者,其中脓毒症组63.2%,脓毒症休克组53.4%在第1小时内使用抗生素。入院1小时内接受抗生素治疗的患者出院率为87.5%,而入院1小时后接受首次抗生素治疗的患者出院率为81.0%。两组中最常见的革兰氏阴性菌为大肠杆菌和克雷伯氏菌。两组最常用的抗生素是美罗培南。所有使用合适抗生素的患者均出院,而抗生素选择不合适的患者只有69.2%出院。在最初抗生素选择不合适的组中,死亡率为30.8%,而在患者接受适当的经验治疗的组中,没有患者死亡。结论:在我的研究中,革兰氏阴性菌仍然是脓毒症的主要病原体,这在印度的大多数icu中都得到了证实。当同时比较适当性和给药时间时,所有在1小时或1小时以上接受适当抗生素治疗的患者存活至出院。然而,如果抗生素选择不当,即使在1小时内接受抗生素治疗,也有25%的患者死亡,如果第一次剂量延迟到1小时后,死亡率进一步增加到40%。基于经验性抗生素治疗适宜性的患者ICU平均住院日和平均住院时间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Appropriate Antibiotics within One Hour and Patients' Outcome: A Study and Review
Background: Rapid initiation of antibiotic treatment is considered crucial in patients with severe infections such as septic shock & bacterial meningitis. The initiation of treatment with inappropriate antimicrobial agents (in relation to the subsequently demonstrated sensitivity of the pathogen) as the initial empiric therapy may be the single most common cause of prolonged delays in the introduction of effective therapy. Only in 5% of cases were antibiotics administered within 1 hr of the decision making, in 47% of cases it took 1–2 hrs. Only in 33% of cases antibiotics were prescribed within one hour of decision making. In 95% of cases antibiotics were administered within one hour of prescription. Sepsis is the main cause of death in patients treated in intensive care units (ICU). Current sepsis guidelines recommend administration of antibiotics within one hour of ED triage. However, the quality of supporting evidence is moderate & studied have shown mixed results regarding the association between antibiotics administration timing & outcome in septic shock. Objective:The aim of this study was to assess whether timing of administration of appropriate antibiotics within one hour of admission to the ICU impact patient outcomes. Method: Timing of ICU admission noted from the patient’s ICU nursing chart when the first vital parameters are noted by the nurse. Timing of administration of 1st dose of antibiotic and antibiotic that is administered within the first one hour of admission is noted from ICU nursing chart (in minutes from the timing of ICU admission). Appropriateness of antibiotic is assessed from the microbiology culture and sensitivity result. Outcome measures is noted from the ICU database. Data is then recorded systemically in the data collection form and finally entered in the excel sheet for analysis. All the data is then analysed by statistician by appropriate statistical tests. Result: A total of 53 patients, including 63.2% in the sepsis group and 53.4% in the septic shock group received antibiotics within the first hour. 87.5 % patients who received antibiotic within one hour of admission were discharged compared to 81.0% patients who received first dose of antibiotic beyond one hour of admission. The commonest gram-negative organisms were E. coli and Klebsiella in both groups. The commonest antibiotic administered was Meropenem in both groups. All patients who received appropriate antibiotic were discharged compared with only 69.2% patients discharged whose antibiotic choice was inappropriate. Mortality was 30.8% in the group whose initial antibiotic choice was inappropriate while no patients died in the group where the patient received appropriate empirical therapy. Conclusion: In my study it is demonstrated that gram-negative bacteria remain the major pathogen in sepsis as has been demonstrated in most ICUs in India. When appropriateness as well as timing of administration were compared simultaneously, all patients who received appropriate antibiotic within one hour or more than one hour survived to discharge. However, if antibiotic choice was inappropriate, 25% patients died even if they received the antibiotics within one hour and if the first dose was delayed beyond the first hour, the mortality further increased to 40%. There was no significant difference in the mean of ICU length of stay and mean hospital length of stay of patients based on appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Appropriate Antibiotics within 1hr of Patients Admission Modeling of Cerebral Anoxia of Respiratory Genesis in Rats Oxidative Stress and Methods of Its Determination in Experimental Brain Pathology Morphological changes in the neurons of the parietal cortex and hippocampus of rats with subtotal cerebral ischemia under conditions of the use of modulators of the L-arginine-NO pathway and against the background of the administration of Omega-3 pol Impact of Appropriate Antibiotics within One Hour and Patients' Outcome: A Study and Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1