附录:是不是罗克珊娜?

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 ART SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1086/712865
J. Turner
{"title":"附录:是不是罗克珊娜?","authors":"J. Turner","doi":"10.1086/712865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous note in this journal, I pointed to a remarkable gap in the reception history of the Villa Farnesina, Rome: Sodoma’s Nuptials of Roxana and Alexander the Great, commissioned for Agostino Chigi’s state bedroom in 1518 to 1519, remained off-limits for visiting artists and never appeared in drawings or printed guides. Vasari described it so inaccurately that I suggested he relied on a secondhand account, and Gaspare Celio’s 1638 guide to Roman art merely notes that “in the Bedrooms there are stories by Iacomo Sodoma of Siena and others.” Appreciation of Sodoma’s now-canonical fresco had to wait until the nineteenth century, when Michelangelo Prunetti declared it (albeit briefly) “veramente poetica, e sublime.” Richard Förster made a thorough iconographical study of the Roxana episode and argued for","PeriodicalId":43235,"journal":{"name":"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addendum: Roxana or Not?\",\"authors\":\"J. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/712865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a previous note in this journal, I pointed to a remarkable gap in the reception history of the Villa Farnesina, Rome: Sodoma’s Nuptials of Roxana and Alexander the Great, commissioned for Agostino Chigi’s state bedroom in 1518 to 1519, remained off-limits for visiting artists and never appeared in drawings or printed guides. Vasari described it so inaccurately that I suggested he relied on a secondhand account, and Gaspare Celio’s 1638 guide to Roman art merely notes that “in the Bedrooms there are stories by Iacomo Sodoma of Siena and others.” Appreciation of Sodoma’s now-canonical fresco had to wait until the nineteenth century, when Michelangelo Prunetti declared it (albeit briefly) “veramente poetica, e sublime.” Richard Förster made a thorough iconographical study of the Roxana episode and argued for\",\"PeriodicalId\":43235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/712865\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOURCE-NOTES IN THE HISTORY OF ART","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本杂志之前的一篇文章中,我指出了罗马法内西纳别墅接待历史上的一个显著空白:1518年至1519年,为阿戈斯蒂诺·基吉(Agostino Chigi)的国家卧室委托制作的索多玛的罗克萨娜和亚历山大大帝的婚礼,一直禁止来访的艺术家进入,从未出现在图纸或印刷指南中。瓦萨里的描述非常不准确,我认为他依赖的是二手资料,加斯帕雷·塞利奥(Gaspare Celio) 1638年出版的罗马艺术指南仅仅指出,“卧室里有锡耶纳的亚科莫·索多玛(Iacomo Sodoma)和其他人的故事。”直到19世纪,人们才开始欣赏索多玛的这幅壁画,当时米开朗基罗·普鲁内蒂(Michelangelo Prunetti)宣称(尽管只是简短地)“veramente poetica, e sublime”。理查德Förster对罗克珊那一集做了彻底的图像学研究,并提出
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addendum: Roxana or Not?
In a previous note in this journal, I pointed to a remarkable gap in the reception history of the Villa Farnesina, Rome: Sodoma’s Nuptials of Roxana and Alexander the Great, commissioned for Agostino Chigi’s state bedroom in 1518 to 1519, remained off-limits for visiting artists and never appeared in drawings or printed guides. Vasari described it so inaccurately that I suggested he relied on a secondhand account, and Gaspare Celio’s 1638 guide to Roman art merely notes that “in the Bedrooms there are stories by Iacomo Sodoma of Siena and others.” Appreciation of Sodoma’s now-canonical fresco had to wait until the nineteenth century, when Michelangelo Prunetti declared it (albeit briefly) “veramente poetica, e sublime.” Richard Förster made a thorough iconographical study of the Roxana episode and argued for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Editor’s Note: Our Current Lineup of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion The Wise and Foolish Virgins of Nicosia Cathedral Summoned by Bells: The Soundscape of Leonardo da Vinci’s Battle of Anghiari Contributors Turks of the Passion: The Antagonists of Christ in Passion Scenes of Transylvanian Wooden Churches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1