与次等人一起倾听:人类世、多元宇宙和超越人类的代理

Q3 Social Sciences Nordia Geographical Publications Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI:10.30671/nordia.107404
António Carvalho, Mariana Riquito
{"title":"与次等人一起倾听:人类世、多元宇宙和超越人类的代理","authors":"António Carvalho, Mariana Riquito","doi":"10.30671/nordia.107404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Anthropocene brings to the fore the need to foster ontologies that reject the modern “one-world world” (Law 2015) model, characterized by extractivism, dualism and human exceptionalism, requiring the enactment of pluriverses (de la Cadena & Blaser 2018) that recognize the heterogeneous clamor of human and non-human agency. As an attempt to listen-with those oppressed and silenced by the modern extractivist paradigm, in this paper, we propose the mobilization of relational, dialogic and nondualistic methodologies that attend to subaltern and more-than-human worlds. Drawing on a variety of sources – such as the Parliament of Things, the Council of All Beings, the Pedagogy of the Oppressed, meditative and artistic practices –, our article speculatively engages with affective, situated, hybrid and counter hegemonic methodologies that articulate contemplative practices, the arts, more-than-human agency and local communities, recognizing that politics, aesthetics and affect are intimately entwined. Our experimental endeavour is centred on three case studies that encapsulate some of the socio-political and technological tensions of our current zeitgeist – wildfires, geoengineering, and lithium mining –, speculating on how pluriversal methodologies can bring to the fore the many worlds silenced by the modern “one-world world”.","PeriodicalId":34559,"journal":{"name":"Nordia Geographical Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listening-with the subaltern: Anthropocene, Pluriverse and more-than-human agency\",\"authors\":\"António Carvalho, Mariana Riquito\",\"doi\":\"10.30671/nordia.107404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Anthropocene brings to the fore the need to foster ontologies that reject the modern “one-world world” (Law 2015) model, characterized by extractivism, dualism and human exceptionalism, requiring the enactment of pluriverses (de la Cadena & Blaser 2018) that recognize the heterogeneous clamor of human and non-human agency. As an attempt to listen-with those oppressed and silenced by the modern extractivist paradigm, in this paper, we propose the mobilization of relational, dialogic and nondualistic methodologies that attend to subaltern and more-than-human worlds. Drawing on a variety of sources – such as the Parliament of Things, the Council of All Beings, the Pedagogy of the Oppressed, meditative and artistic practices –, our article speculatively engages with affective, situated, hybrid and counter hegemonic methodologies that articulate contemplative practices, the arts, more-than-human agency and local communities, recognizing that politics, aesthetics and affect are intimately entwined. Our experimental endeavour is centred on three case studies that encapsulate some of the socio-political and technological tensions of our current zeitgeist – wildfires, geoengineering, and lithium mining –, speculating on how pluriversal methodologies can bring to the fore the many worlds silenced by the modern “one-world world”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordia Geographical Publications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordia Geographical Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.107404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordia Geographical Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.107404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类世凸显了培育拒绝现代“一个世界的世界”(Law 2015)模式的本体论的必要性,该模式以榨取主义、二元论和人类例外论为特征,要求制定多元宇宙(de la Cadena & Blaser 2018),承认人类和非人类机构的异质喧嚣。为了倾听那些被现代榨取主义范式压迫和沉默的人,在本文中,我们建议动员关系,对话和非二元主义的方法来关注次等和超越人类的世界。我们的文章借鉴了各种各样的来源——比如物的议会、万物委员会、被压迫者的教育学、冥想和艺术实践——思辨地运用了情感、情境、混合和反霸权的方法,这些方法阐明了沉思实践、艺术、超越人类的代理和地方社区,认识到政治、美学和情感是密切交织在一起的。我们的实验努力集中在三个案例研究上,这些案例研究概括了我们当前时代精神的一些社会政治和技术紧张局势——野火、地球工程和锂采矿——并推测多元方法如何能够使被现代“一个世界”沉默的许多世界脱颖而出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Listening-with the subaltern: Anthropocene, Pluriverse and more-than-human agency
The Anthropocene brings to the fore the need to foster ontologies that reject the modern “one-world world” (Law 2015) model, characterized by extractivism, dualism and human exceptionalism, requiring the enactment of pluriverses (de la Cadena & Blaser 2018) that recognize the heterogeneous clamor of human and non-human agency. As an attempt to listen-with those oppressed and silenced by the modern extractivist paradigm, in this paper, we propose the mobilization of relational, dialogic and nondualistic methodologies that attend to subaltern and more-than-human worlds. Drawing on a variety of sources – such as the Parliament of Things, the Council of All Beings, the Pedagogy of the Oppressed, meditative and artistic practices –, our article speculatively engages with affective, situated, hybrid and counter hegemonic methodologies that articulate contemplative practices, the arts, more-than-human agency and local communities, recognizing that politics, aesthetics and affect are intimately entwined. Our experimental endeavour is centred on three case studies that encapsulate some of the socio-political and technological tensions of our current zeitgeist – wildfires, geoengineering, and lithium mining –, speculating on how pluriversal methodologies can bring to the fore the many worlds silenced by the modern “one-world world”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordia Geographical Publications
Nordia Geographical Publications Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Green Großraum: Carl Schmitt’s political ecology of space Shifting notions of the rural: Protests over traffic infrastructure and far-right normalization Far-right localism as an environmental strategy in France The spatial politics of depoliticization: Visionary planning, bioeconomy, and forest capital Governing “decadent cities”: The far-right as agents of climate counterinsurgency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1