血浆置换联合静脉注射免疫球蛋白联合利妥昔单抗治疗肾移植后抗体介导性排斥反应的疗效观察

Lixiang Zhao, Z. Huang, Jinfeng Li, Lei Liu, Keke Zhang, Hongchang Xie, Yong-hua Feng, X. Pang, G. Feng
{"title":"血浆置换联合静脉注射免疫球蛋白联合利妥昔单抗治疗肾移植后抗体介导性排斥反应的疗效观察","authors":"Lixiang Zhao, Z. Huang, Jinfeng Li, Lei Liu, Keke Zhang, Hongchang Xie, Yong-hua Feng, X. Pang, G. Feng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) plus Rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom May 2015 to November 2018, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted for 540 recipients with high-resolution HLA undergoing kidney transplantation. According to the criteria of diagnosing AMR and patient selection, 20 patients were selected for PP+ IVIG (group A, n=12), PP+ IVIG+ Rituximab (group B, n=8). The efficacies and outcomes of two groups were compared. \n \n \nResults \nDuring a follow-up period of (12.0±5.8) months, no significant inter-group differences existed in basic profiles (P>0.05). After AMR treatment, serum creatinine levels decreased significantly from 283.4 to 226.4 μmol/L in group A (P=0.001) and from 289.4 to 166.6 μmol/L in group B (P=0.049). And the magnitude of decline was more marked in group B (P=0.023). Meanwhile, antibody MFI (log10) decreased from 3.73 to 3.62 in group A (P=0.012) and from 3.57 to 3.02 in group B (P=0.043). At months 3 and 6, serum creatinine level was lower in group B than that in group A (125.0 vs. 166.1 μmol/L, P=0.03; 127.0 vs. 169.0 μmol/L, P=0.048). The serum creatinine levels of AMR patients were 249.8 and 233.8 μmol/L respectively (P=0.182). Serum creatinine levels were 176.1 and 120.3 μmol/L (P=0.045) and 180.2 and 114.8 μmol/L at months 3 and 6 (P=0.044) respectively. Serum creatinine levels were 202.8 and 122.5 μmol/L (P=0.049) in group A and 142.7 and 107.0 μmol/L (P=0.046) in group B respectively. Four recipients developed allograft failure. At month 6 post-operation, AMR occurred in group A (n=3, 25%) and group B (n=1, 12.5%). And the incidence of leucopenia was 37.5% and 0 (P=0.049) in groups A and B respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nPP and IVIG plus rituximab is more efficacious for AMR. The earlier occurring time, the better prognosis. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Antibody-mediated rejection; Plasmapheresis; Intravenous immunoglobulin; Rituximab","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"60 1","pages":"468-472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin plus Rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Lixiang Zhao, Z. Huang, Jinfeng Li, Lei Liu, Keke Zhang, Hongchang Xie, Yong-hua Feng, X. Pang, G. Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) plus Rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom May 2015 to November 2018, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted for 540 recipients with high-resolution HLA undergoing kidney transplantation. According to the criteria of diagnosing AMR and patient selection, 20 patients were selected for PP+ IVIG (group A, n=12), PP+ IVIG+ Rituximab (group B, n=8). The efficacies and outcomes of two groups were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nDuring a follow-up period of (12.0±5.8) months, no significant inter-group differences existed in basic profiles (P>0.05). After AMR treatment, serum creatinine levels decreased significantly from 283.4 to 226.4 μmol/L in group A (P=0.001) and from 289.4 to 166.6 μmol/L in group B (P=0.049). And the magnitude of decline was more marked in group B (P=0.023). Meanwhile, antibody MFI (log10) decreased from 3.73 to 3.62 in group A (P=0.012) and from 3.57 to 3.02 in group B (P=0.043). At months 3 and 6, serum creatinine level was lower in group B than that in group A (125.0 vs. 166.1 μmol/L, P=0.03; 127.0 vs. 169.0 μmol/L, P=0.048). The serum creatinine levels of AMR patients were 249.8 and 233.8 μmol/L respectively (P=0.182). Serum creatinine levels were 176.1 and 120.3 μmol/L (P=0.045) and 180.2 and 114.8 μmol/L at months 3 and 6 (P=0.044) respectively. Serum creatinine levels were 202.8 and 122.5 μmol/L (P=0.049) in group A and 142.7 and 107.0 μmol/L (P=0.046) in group B respectively. Four recipients developed allograft failure. At month 6 post-operation, AMR occurred in group A (n=3, 25%) and group B (n=1, 12.5%). And the incidence of leucopenia was 37.5% and 0 (P=0.049) in groups A and B respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPP and IVIG plus rituximab is more efficacious for AMR. The earlier occurring time, the better prognosis. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney transplantation; Antibody-mediated rejection; Plasmapheresis; Intravenous immunoglobulin; Rituximab\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"468-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较血浆置换(PP)与静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)联合利妥昔单抗(Rituximab)治疗肾移植术后抗体介导性排斥反应(AMR)的疗效。方法2015年5月至2018年11月,对540例高分辨率HLA肾移植受者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。根据AMR诊断标准及患者选择,选择PP+ IVIG组(A组,n=12)、PP+ IVIG+利妥昔单抗组(B组,n=8)患者20例。比较两组患者的疗效和转归。结果在(12.0±5.8)个月的随访期间,两组患者基本情况差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经AMR治疗后,A组血清肌酐水平由283.4 μmol/L降至226.4 μmol/L (P=0.001), B组由289.4 μmol/L降至166.6 μmol/L (P=0.049)。B组下降幅度更明显(P=0.023)。抗体MFI (log10)由A组的3.73降至3.62 (P=0.012),由B组的3.57降至3.02 (P=0.043)。第3、6个月时,B组血清肌酐水平低于A组(125.0 vs. 166.1 μmol/L, P=0.03;127.0 vs. 169.0 μmol/L, P=0.048)。AMR患者血清肌酐水平分别为249.8 μmol/L和233.8 μmol/L (P=0.182)。第3个月和第6个月血清肌酐水平分别为176.1和120.3 μmol/L (P=0.045)和180.2和114.8 μmol/L (P=0.044)。A组和B组血清肌酐水平分别为202.8和122.5 μmol/L (P=0.049)和142.7和107.0 μmol/L (P=0.046)。4名受者发生同种异体移植失败。术后6个月,A组(n=3, 25%)和B组(n=1, 12.5%)发生AMR。A组和B组的白细胞减少率分别为37.5%和0 (P=0.049)。结论PP和IVIG联合利妥昔单抗治疗AMR更有效。发病时间越早,预后越好。关键词:肾移植;抗体介入拒绝;血浆置换;静脉注射免疫球蛋白;利妥昔单抗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin plus Rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) plus Rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation. Methods From May 2015 to November 2018, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted for 540 recipients with high-resolution HLA undergoing kidney transplantation. According to the criteria of diagnosing AMR and patient selection, 20 patients were selected for PP+ IVIG (group A, n=12), PP+ IVIG+ Rituximab (group B, n=8). The efficacies and outcomes of two groups were compared. Results During a follow-up period of (12.0±5.8) months, no significant inter-group differences existed in basic profiles (P>0.05). After AMR treatment, serum creatinine levels decreased significantly from 283.4 to 226.4 μmol/L in group A (P=0.001) and from 289.4 to 166.6 μmol/L in group B (P=0.049). And the magnitude of decline was more marked in group B (P=0.023). Meanwhile, antibody MFI (log10) decreased from 3.73 to 3.62 in group A (P=0.012) and from 3.57 to 3.02 in group B (P=0.043). At months 3 and 6, serum creatinine level was lower in group B than that in group A (125.0 vs. 166.1 μmol/L, P=0.03; 127.0 vs. 169.0 μmol/L, P=0.048). The serum creatinine levels of AMR patients were 249.8 and 233.8 μmol/L respectively (P=0.182). Serum creatinine levels were 176.1 and 120.3 μmol/L (P=0.045) and 180.2 and 114.8 μmol/L at months 3 and 6 (P=0.044) respectively. Serum creatinine levels were 202.8 and 122.5 μmol/L (P=0.049) in group A and 142.7 and 107.0 μmol/L (P=0.046) in group B respectively. Four recipients developed allograft failure. At month 6 post-operation, AMR occurred in group A (n=3, 25%) and group B (n=1, 12.5%). And the incidence of leucopenia was 37.5% and 0 (P=0.049) in groups A and B respectively. Conclusions PP and IVIG plus rituximab is more efficacious for AMR. The earlier occurring time, the better prognosis. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Antibody-mediated rejection; Plasmapheresis; Intravenous immunoglobulin; Rituximab
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasonography to Biopsy, in Evaluation of Post-transplant Complications and Kidney Function Overview of global organ donation and transplantation in 2020 Development and prospect of clinical research on lung transplantation in post-COVID-19 era. Risk assessment of organ donation and procurement during COVID-19 epidemic Clinical analysis of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on one case with living-related kidney transplantation/ 中华器官移植杂志
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1