{"title":"肾移植和造血干细胞移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病的临床分析","authors":"Hongyi Liang, Jian Xu, Li-xin Yu, Leiyu Yao, Fangxiang Fu, Jiangtao Li, Jin-yan Peng, Yanna Liu, Guoming Deng, Y. Miao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo provide theoretic rationales and clinical experience for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) by comparing the characteristics of PTLD in kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and reviewing the relevant literature reports. \n \n \nMethods \nTwenty-seven adult PTLD patients from 2000 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 11 kidney transplant recipients (KT group) and 16 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT group). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed between two groups. Cox’s proportional hazard model was utilized for evaluating the prognostic factors. \n \n \nResults \nThe incidence of PTLD for KT and HSCT groups were 0.5 % and 1.1 % respectively. PTLD patients of KT group had a later onset than that of HSCT group (105.1 vs 3.1 months, P<0.01). Also Epstein-Barr virus was less frequently detected in KT group (36.4 % vs 81.3 %, P<0.05). The 5-year overall survival was (46.8%±10.5%). According to Cox analysis, application of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and high ECOG scores were risk factors for a poor prognosis of PTLD. \n \n \nConclusions \nMost cases of KT-PTLD have a late onset. In contrast, HSCT-PTLD has an earlier onset and a higher incidence of EBV infectious. And application of ATG and high ECOG scores are poor prognosis factors of PTLD. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Prognosis","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"514 1","pages":"345-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical analysis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney transplant recipients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients summary\",\"authors\":\"Hongyi Liang, Jian Xu, Li-xin Yu, Leiyu Yao, Fangxiang Fu, Jiangtao Li, Jin-yan Peng, Yanna Liu, Guoming Deng, Y. Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo provide theoretic rationales and clinical experience for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) by comparing the characteristics of PTLD in kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and reviewing the relevant literature reports. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nTwenty-seven adult PTLD patients from 2000 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 11 kidney transplant recipients (KT group) and 16 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT group). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed between two groups. Cox’s proportional hazard model was utilized for evaluating the prognostic factors. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe incidence of PTLD for KT and HSCT groups were 0.5 % and 1.1 % respectively. PTLD patients of KT group had a later onset than that of HSCT group (105.1 vs 3.1 months, P<0.01). Also Epstein-Barr virus was less frequently detected in KT group (36.4 % vs 81.3 %, P<0.05). The 5-year overall survival was (46.8%±10.5%). According to Cox analysis, application of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and high ECOG scores were risk factors for a poor prognosis of PTLD. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nMost cases of KT-PTLD have a late onset. In contrast, HSCT-PTLD has an earlier onset and a higher incidence of EBV infectious. And application of ATG and high ECOG scores are poor prognosis factors of PTLD. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney transplantation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Prognosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"514 1\",\"pages\":\"345-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的通过比较肾脏和造血干细胞移植受者移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)的特点,并复习相关文献报道,为治疗移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)提供理论依据和临床经验。方法回顾性分析2000 ~ 2017年27例成人PTLD患者的临床资料。肾移植(KT组)11例,造血干细胞移植(HSCT组)16例。分析两组患者的临床特点及预后。采用Cox比例风险模型评价预后因素。结果KT组和HSCT组PTLD的发生率分别为0.5%和1.1%。KT组PTLD患者发病时间晚于HSCT组(105.1个月vs 3.1个月,P<0.01)。KT组Epstein-Barr病毒检出率低于KT组(36.4% vs 81.3%, P<0.05)。5年总生存率为(46.8%±10.5%)。Cox分析显示,抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(antithymocyte globulin, ATG)的使用和高ECOG评分是PTLD预后不良的危险因素。结论KT-PTLD多为晚发性。相比之下,HSCT-PTLD发病更早,EBV感染发生率更高。应用ATG和高ECOG评分是PTLD预后不良的因素。关键词:肾移植;造血干细胞移植;预后
Clinical analysis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney transplant recipients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients summary
Objective
To provide theoretic rationales and clinical experience for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) by comparing the characteristics of PTLD in kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and reviewing the relevant literature reports.
Methods
Twenty-seven adult PTLD patients from 2000 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 11 kidney transplant recipients (KT group) and 16 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT group). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed between two groups. Cox’s proportional hazard model was utilized for evaluating the prognostic factors.
Results
The incidence of PTLD for KT and HSCT groups were 0.5 % and 1.1 % respectively. PTLD patients of KT group had a later onset than that of HSCT group (105.1 vs 3.1 months, P<0.01). Also Epstein-Barr virus was less frequently detected in KT group (36.4 % vs 81.3 %, P<0.05). The 5-year overall survival was (46.8%±10.5%). According to Cox analysis, application of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and high ECOG scores were risk factors for a poor prognosis of PTLD.
Conclusions
Most cases of KT-PTLD have a late onset. In contrast, HSCT-PTLD has an earlier onset and a higher incidence of EBV infectious. And application of ATG and high ECOG scores are poor prognosis factors of PTLD.
Key words:
Kidney transplantation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Prognosis