可再生电力能源整合:量化国际输电容量市场设计的价值

K. Neuhoff, R. Boyd, T. Grau, J. Barquín, F. Echavarren, J. Bialek, C. Dent, C. von Hirschhausen, B. Hobbs, F. Kunz, H. Weigt, C. Nabe, G. Papaefthymiou, C. Weber
{"title":"可再生电力能源整合:量化国际输电容量市场设计的价值","authors":"K. Neuhoff, R. Boyd, T. Grau, J. Barquín, F. Echavarren, J. Bialek, C. Dent, C. von Hirschhausen, B. Hobbs, F. Kunz, H. Weigt, C. Nabe, G. Papaefthymiou, C. Weber","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1950595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating large quantities of supply-driven renewable electricity generation remains a political and operational challenge. One of the main obstacles in Europe to installing at least 200 GWs of power from variable renewable sources is how to deal with the insufficient network capacity and the congestion that will result from new flow patterns. We model the current methodology for controlling congestion at international borders and compare its results, under varying penetrations of wind power, with a model that simulates an integrated European network that utilises nodal/localised marginal pricing. The nodal pricing simulations illustrate that congestion - and price - patterns vary considerably between wind scenarios and within countries, and that a nodal price regime could make fuller use of existing EU network capacity, introducing substantial operational cost savings and reducing marginal power prices in the majority of European countries.","PeriodicalId":14435,"journal":{"name":"International Strategy & Policy eJournal","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renewable Electric Energy Integration: Quantifying the Value of Design of Markets for International Transmission Capacity\",\"authors\":\"K. Neuhoff, R. Boyd, T. Grau, J. Barquín, F. Echavarren, J. Bialek, C. Dent, C. von Hirschhausen, B. Hobbs, F. Kunz, H. Weigt, C. Nabe, G. Papaefthymiou, C. Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1950595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integrating large quantities of supply-driven renewable electricity generation remains a political and operational challenge. One of the main obstacles in Europe to installing at least 200 GWs of power from variable renewable sources is how to deal with the insufficient network capacity and the congestion that will result from new flow patterns. We model the current methodology for controlling congestion at international borders and compare its results, under varying penetrations of wind power, with a model that simulates an integrated European network that utilises nodal/localised marginal pricing. The nodal pricing simulations illustrate that congestion - and price - patterns vary considerably between wind scenarios and within countries, and that a nodal price regime could make fuller use of existing EU network capacity, introducing substantial operational cost savings and reducing marginal power prices in the majority of European countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Strategy & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Strategy & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1950595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Strategy & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1950595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

整合大量供应驱动的可再生能源发电仍然是一个政治和运营上的挑战。在欧洲,安装至少200吉瓦的可变可再生能源的主要障碍之一是如何处理网络容量不足和新流量模式将导致的拥堵。我们对目前控制国际边界拥堵的方法进行了建模,并将其结果与一个模拟利用节点/局部边际定价的综合欧洲网络的模型进行了比较。节点定价模拟表明,拥堵和价格模式在不同的风力方案和国家内部差异很大,节点价格制度可以更充分地利用现有的欧盟网络容量,在大多数欧洲国家引入大量的运营成本节约和降低边际电价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Renewable Electric Energy Integration: Quantifying the Value of Design of Markets for International Transmission Capacity
Integrating large quantities of supply-driven renewable electricity generation remains a political and operational challenge. One of the main obstacles in Europe to installing at least 200 GWs of power from variable renewable sources is how to deal with the insufficient network capacity and the congestion that will result from new flow patterns. We model the current methodology for controlling congestion at international borders and compare its results, under varying penetrations of wind power, with a model that simulates an integrated European network that utilises nodal/localised marginal pricing. The nodal pricing simulations illustrate that congestion - and price - patterns vary considerably between wind scenarios and within countries, and that a nodal price regime could make fuller use of existing EU network capacity, introducing substantial operational cost savings and reducing marginal power prices in the majority of European countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Oh! Teleworking!” Regimes of Engagement and the Lived Experience of Female Spanish Teleworkers The Interplay of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Political Activity in Emerging Markets: The Role of Strategic Flexibility in Non‐Market Strategies Why Some are More Equal: Family Firm Heterogeneity and the Effect on Management's Attention to CSR Exploratory and Exploitative Adaptation in Turbulent and Complex Landscapes Moral Standards in Managerial Decisions: In Search of a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1