韩国语左结抬高中的大小写不匹配和依赖复数标记

IF 0.5 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI:10.1515/psicl-2022-2009
Jeong-Seok Kim, Seojin Choi, J. Lee
{"title":"韩国语左结抬高中的大小写不匹配和依赖复数标记","authors":"Jeong-Seok Kim, Seojin Choi, J. Lee","doi":"10.1515/psicl-2022-2009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Left-node-raising (LNR), as a mirror image of right-node-raising (RNR), is a phenomenon in which the leftmost constituent is shared by the two conjuncts. In this paper, we empirically and theoretically explore two distinctive properties of LNR in Korean: licensing Case-mismatches of a shared element and the dependent plural marker tul. We argue that the first conjunct Case-licensing of the shared element in LNR is crucial across Case types. We thus confirm the explanatory edge of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR, nullifying previous symmetric analyses of LNR such as across-the-board scrambling and multidominance. Additionally, we argue that LNR is not a mirror image of RNR in that symmetric analyses may explain the distribution of the dependent plural marker in RNR but not that of the dependent plural marker in LNR. Therefore, we argue against a unified analysis of RNR and LNR. We further show that the island effect of LNR is evidence of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR.","PeriodicalId":43804,"journal":{"name":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"133 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Licensing Case-mismatches and dependent plural markers in Korean left-node-raising\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Seok Kim, Seojin Choi, J. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/psicl-2022-2009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Left-node-raising (LNR), as a mirror image of right-node-raising (RNR), is a phenomenon in which the leftmost constituent is shared by the two conjuncts. In this paper, we empirically and theoretically explore two distinctive properties of LNR in Korean: licensing Case-mismatches of a shared element and the dependent plural marker tul. We argue that the first conjunct Case-licensing of the shared element in LNR is crucial across Case types. We thus confirm the explanatory edge of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR, nullifying previous symmetric analyses of LNR such as across-the-board scrambling and multidominance. Additionally, we argue that LNR is not a mirror image of RNR in that symmetric analyses may explain the distribution of the dependent plural marker in RNR but not that of the dependent plural marker in LNR. Therefore, we argue against a unified analysis of RNR and LNR. We further show that the island effect of LNR is evidence of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-2009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-2009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左节点提升(LNR)是右节点提升(RNR)的镜像,是两个连词共享最左边的成分的现象。本文从实证和理论两方面探讨了韩国语LNR的两个特点:共享元素的许可大小写不匹配和依赖复数标记tul。我们认为,LNR中共享元素的第一个连接Case许可在所有Case类型中都至关重要。因此,我们确认了LNR的加扰分析的解释优势,取消了以前的LNR对称分析,如全面置乱和多优势。此外,我们认为LNR不是RNR的镜像,因为对称分析可以解释RNR中依赖复数标记的分布,但不能解释LNR中依赖复数标记的分布。因此,我们反对对RNR和LNR进行统一分析。我们进一步证明了LNR的岛效应证明了LNR的乱序加亲分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Licensing Case-mismatches and dependent plural markers in Korean left-node-raising
Abstract Left-node-raising (LNR), as a mirror image of right-node-raising (RNR), is a phenomenon in which the leftmost constituent is shared by the two conjuncts. In this paper, we empirically and theoretically explore two distinctive properties of LNR in Korean: licensing Case-mismatches of a shared element and the dependent plural marker tul. We argue that the first conjunct Case-licensing of the shared element in LNR is crucial across Case types. We thus confirm the explanatory edge of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR, nullifying previous symmetric analyses of LNR such as across-the-board scrambling and multidominance. Additionally, we argue that LNR is not a mirror image of RNR in that symmetric analyses may explain the distribution of the dependent plural marker in RNR but not that of the dependent plural marker in LNR. Therefore, we argue against a unified analysis of RNR and LNR. We further show that the island effect of LNR is evidence of the scrambling-plus-pro analysis of LNR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The syntactic variety and semantic unity of the V de resultative construction in Mandarin Chinese Complexity trade-off in morphosyntactic module: suggestions from Japanese dialects A survey of Polish ASR speech datasets Investigating the effects of late sign language acquisition on referent introduction: a follow-up study “Gap” matters: reflections on the notion of “gap” of relative clauses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1