定位与可能性:重构研究生社区参与的策略与策略。

Adam Hubrig, Katie McWain, Marcus Meade, R. W. Shah
{"title":"定位与可能性:重构研究生社区参与的策略与策略。","authors":"Adam Hubrig, Katie McWain, Marcus Meade, R. W. Shah","doi":"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on the authors’ experiences initiating and directing a community partnership program, this article illustrates how graduate students who lead engagement programs can be caught between forces that pull them toward tactical partnerships unaffiliated with the university and strategic partnerships incorporated into university departments. Conceived as distinct models by philosopher de Certeau (1984) and extended in Mathieu’s Tactics of Hope (2005), tactics and strategies theorize the impact of integrating with powerful institutions or remaining independent. Using narrative illustrations from their own graduatefounded engagement program, the authors argue that the dichotomous framework of tactics and strategies does not provide the complexity necessary to successfully maneuver within institutional and community dynamics. Instead, tactics and strategies is reconceptualized as the basis of a decisionfacilitating heuristic for graduatestudent led community initiatives to increase students’ agency to navigate institutional forces.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"21 1","pages":"93-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positionality and Possibility: Reframing Tactics and Strategies for Graduate Student Community Engagement.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Hubrig, Katie McWain, Marcus Meade, R. W. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on the authors’ experiences initiating and directing a community partnership program, this article illustrates how graduate students who lead engagement programs can be caught between forces that pull them toward tactical partnerships unaffiliated with the university and strategic partnerships incorporated into university departments. Conceived as distinct models by philosopher de Certeau (1984) and extended in Mathieu’s Tactics of Hope (2005), tactics and strategies theorize the impact of integrating with powerful institutions or remaining independent. Using narrative illustrations from their own graduatefounded engagement program, the authors argue that the dichotomous framework of tactics and strategies does not provide the complexity necessary to successfully maneuver within institutional and community dynamics. Instead, tactics and strategies is reconceptualized as the basis of a decisionfacilitating heuristic for graduatestudent led community initiatives to increase students’ agency to navigate institutional forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan journal of community service learning\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"93-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan journal of community service learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根据作者发起和指导社区伙伴关系项目的经验,这篇文章说明了领导参与项目的研究生如何在两种力量之间进退两难,一种力量将他们拉向与大学无关的战术伙伴关系,另一种力量将他们拉向与大学院系合并的战略伙伴关系。哲学家德·塞托(1984)将战术和战略作为不同的模型构思出来,并在马修的《希望的策略》(2005)中进行了扩展,将与强大机构整合或保持独立的影响理论化。作者从他们自己的研究生参与项目中使用叙事插图,认为战术和战略的二分框架并没有提供在机构和社区动态中成功操作所必需的复杂性。相反,战术和策略被重新定义为研究生领导的社区倡议的决策促进启发式的基础,以增加学生的代理来驾驭制度力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positionality and Possibility: Reframing Tactics and Strategies for Graduate Student Community Engagement.
Drawing on the authors’ experiences initiating and directing a community partnership program, this article illustrates how graduate students who lead engagement programs can be caught between forces that pull them toward tactical partnerships unaffiliated with the university and strategic partnerships incorporated into university departments. Conceived as distinct models by philosopher de Certeau (1984) and extended in Mathieu’s Tactics of Hope (2005), tactics and strategies theorize the impact of integrating with powerful institutions or remaining independent. Using narrative illustrations from their own graduatefounded engagement program, the authors argue that the dichotomous framework of tactics and strategies does not provide the complexity necessary to successfully maneuver within institutional and community dynamics. Instead, tactics and strategies is reconceptualized as the basis of a decisionfacilitating heuristic for graduatestudent led community initiatives to increase students’ agency to navigate institutional forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1