意大利极端干旱夏季不同施肥方式下玉米土壤碳排放

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Italian Journal of Agrometeorology-Rivista Italiana Di Agrometeorologia Pub Date : 2019-10-06 DOI:10.13128/IJAM-648
L. Verdi, M. Mancini, M. Napoli, R. Vivoli, A. Pardini, S. Orlandini, A. D. Marta
{"title":"意大利极端干旱夏季不同施肥方式下玉米土壤碳排放","authors":"L. Verdi, M. Mancini, M. Napoli, R. Vivoli, A. Pardini, S. Orlandini, A. D. Marta","doi":"10.13128/IJAM-648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decades, climate change and variability are increasingly and negatively affecting agriculture. To ensure satisfactory and stable food production, agriculture is intensifying the adoption of external input with environmental consequences such as the emission of greenhouse gases. In this experiment, we monitored CO2 and CH4 emission dynamics from cultivation of maize for silage grown under different fertilization treatments: (i) liquid fraction of digestate from pig slurries, (ii) urea, and (iii) no fertilization (control), in an extremely dry summer in Central Italy. Results show that the use of the liquid-organic fertilizer (digestate) significantly increased CO2 emissions from soil (685.29 kg-C ha-1) compared to the conventional fertilizer (urea) (391.60 kg-C ha-1). However, CH4 emissions were comparable between the two fertilizers and almost negligible compared to those of CO2. In both treatments CH4 emissions were enhanced by the only precipitation event, coupled with an increase of air temperature. Effectiveness of tested fertilizers was assessed through a yield analysis, and proved that digestate may represent a viable alternative to urea (6.97 and 6.48 t ha-1). Nevertheless, considering CO2 emissions from digestate and the numerous passes in field needed for its spreading, the use of this fertilizer in extreme dry conditions requires specific considerations.","PeriodicalId":54371,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Agrometeorology-Rivista Italiana Di Agrometeorologia","volume":"27 1","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil carbon emissions from maize under different fertilization methods in an extremely dry summer in Italy\",\"authors\":\"L. Verdi, M. Mancini, M. Napoli, R. Vivoli, A. Pardini, S. Orlandini, A. D. Marta\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/IJAM-648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last decades, climate change and variability are increasingly and negatively affecting agriculture. To ensure satisfactory and stable food production, agriculture is intensifying the adoption of external input with environmental consequences such as the emission of greenhouse gases. In this experiment, we monitored CO2 and CH4 emission dynamics from cultivation of maize for silage grown under different fertilization treatments: (i) liquid fraction of digestate from pig slurries, (ii) urea, and (iii) no fertilization (control), in an extremely dry summer in Central Italy. Results show that the use of the liquid-organic fertilizer (digestate) significantly increased CO2 emissions from soil (685.29 kg-C ha-1) compared to the conventional fertilizer (urea) (391.60 kg-C ha-1). However, CH4 emissions were comparable between the two fertilizers and almost negligible compared to those of CO2. In both treatments CH4 emissions were enhanced by the only precipitation event, coupled with an increase of air temperature. Effectiveness of tested fertilizers was assessed through a yield analysis, and proved that digestate may represent a viable alternative to urea (6.97 and 6.48 t ha-1). Nevertheless, considering CO2 emissions from digestate and the numerous passes in field needed for its spreading, the use of this fertilizer in extreme dry conditions requires specific considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Agrometeorology-Rivista Italiana Di Agrometeorologia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"3-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Agrometeorology-Rivista Italiana Di Agrometeorologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/IJAM-648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Agrometeorology-Rivista Italiana Di Agrometeorologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/IJAM-648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在过去的几十年里,气候变化和变异对农业的负面影响越来越大。为了确保令人满意和稳定的粮食生产,农业正在加紧采用具有温室气体排放等环境后果的外部投入。在这项试验中,我们在意大利中部一个极度干燥的夏季,监测了不同施肥处理下青贮玉米的CO2和CH4排放动态:(i)猪浆消化液的液体部分,(ii)尿素和(iii)不施肥(对照)。结果表明:液体有机肥(消化液)比常规有机肥(尿素)(391.60 kg-C ha-1)显著增加土壤CO2排放量(685.29 kg-C ha-1);然而,两种肥料的甲烷排放量相当,与二氧化碳排放量相比几乎可以忽略不计。在两种处理中,CH4排放均因降水事件和气温升高而增加。通过产量分析评估了所测试肥料的有效性,并证明消化液可能是尿素的可行替代品(6.97和6.48 t ha-1)。然而,考虑到消化过程中二氧化碳的排放和其扩散所需的大量通道,在极端干燥条件下使用这种肥料需要特别考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil carbon emissions from maize under different fertilization methods in an extremely dry summer in Italy
During the last decades, climate change and variability are increasingly and negatively affecting agriculture. To ensure satisfactory and stable food production, agriculture is intensifying the adoption of external input with environmental consequences such as the emission of greenhouse gases. In this experiment, we monitored CO2 and CH4 emission dynamics from cultivation of maize for silage grown under different fertilization treatments: (i) liquid fraction of digestate from pig slurries, (ii) urea, and (iii) no fertilization (control), in an extremely dry summer in Central Italy. Results show that the use of the liquid-organic fertilizer (digestate) significantly increased CO2 emissions from soil (685.29 kg-C ha-1) compared to the conventional fertilizer (urea) (391.60 kg-C ha-1). However, CH4 emissions were comparable between the two fertilizers and almost negligible compared to those of CO2. In both treatments CH4 emissions were enhanced by the only precipitation event, coupled with an increase of air temperature. Effectiveness of tested fertilizers was assessed through a yield analysis, and proved that digestate may represent a viable alternative to urea (6.97 and 6.48 t ha-1). Nevertheless, considering CO2 emissions from digestate and the numerous passes in field needed for its spreading, the use of this fertilizer in extreme dry conditions requires specific considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Among the areas of specific interest of the journal there are: ecophysiology; phenology; plant growth, quality and quantity of production; plant pathology; entomology; welfare conditions of livestocks; soil physics and hydrology; micrometeorology; modeling, simulation and forecasting; remote sensing; territorial planning; geographical information systems and spatialization techniques; instrumentation to measure physical and biological quantities; data validation techniques, agroclimatology; agriculture scientific dissemination; support services for farmers.
期刊最新文献
Italian winegrowers’ and wine makers’ attitudes toward climate hazards and their strategy of adaptation to the change Understanding trends and gaps in global research of crop evapotranspiration: a bibliometric and thematic review Transpiration by sap flow Thermal Dissipation Method: applicability to a hedgerow olive orchard Estimation of daily global solar radiation based on different whitening applications using temperature in Mediterranean type greenhouses Effects of sowing date on bolting and frost damage to autumn-sown sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in temperate regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1