不同施肥处理下热带土壤木薯产量指标及总有机碳

M. L. Pimentel, I. Reis, Jailson Sousa de Castro, Victor Sousa Portela, Maria Lita Padinha Corrêa Romano, C. Vildoso, E. Gasparin, Eliandra de Freitas Sia
{"title":"不同施肥处理下热带土壤木薯产量指标及总有机碳","authors":"M. L. Pimentel, I. Reis, Jailson Sousa de Castro, Victor Sousa Portela, Maria Lita Padinha Corrêa Romano, C. Vildoso, E. Gasparin, Eliandra de Freitas Sia","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cassava is a crop of major socioeconomic importance in Brazil because of its versatility and high yield in nutrient-poor soils. Fertilization can improve soil quality and further increase cassava yield. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different fertilizer sources on soil total organic carbon (TOC) and cassava yield indicators. The experiment was conducted on a family farm in Santarém, Brazil, in a randomized block design, with four treatments and five replications. Treatments were as follows: T1, unfertilized soil (control); T2, NPK fertilizer; T3, poultry manure; and T4, cattle manure. The variables analyzed were soil TOC, shoot fresh weight, plant height, marketable stem diameter, marketable root yield, and yield. Data were subjected to analysis of variance, Tukey’s test (p < 0.05), hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis. Application of organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) increased soil TOC levels. Chemical fertilizer treatment (T2) resulted in the highest shoot fresh weight, yield, and marketable root yield. Marketable stem diameter was positively influenced by T2 and T4. There were no significant treatment effects on plant height. Hierarchical clustering isolated organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) from other treatments. Principal component analysis revealed two principal components, which together explained 87.77% of the total variance. Organic fertilizer application provided the highest TOC accumulation during the experimental period, whereas NPK fertilization was the most effective in increasing cassava yield in the first year of cultivation","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cassava yield indicators and total organic carbon in tropical soils under different fertilization treatments\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Pimentel, I. Reis, Jailson Sousa de Castro, Victor Sousa Portela, Maria Lita Padinha Corrêa Romano, C. Vildoso, E. Gasparin, Eliandra de Freitas Sia\",\"doi\":\"10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cassava is a crop of major socioeconomic importance in Brazil because of its versatility and high yield in nutrient-poor soils. Fertilization can improve soil quality and further increase cassava yield. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different fertilizer sources on soil total organic carbon (TOC) and cassava yield indicators. The experiment was conducted on a family farm in Santarém, Brazil, in a randomized block design, with four treatments and five replications. Treatments were as follows: T1, unfertilized soil (control); T2, NPK fertilizer; T3, poultry manure; and T4, cattle manure. The variables analyzed were soil TOC, shoot fresh weight, plant height, marketable stem diameter, marketable root yield, and yield. Data were subjected to analysis of variance, Tukey’s test (p < 0.05), hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis. Application of organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) increased soil TOC levels. Chemical fertilizer treatment (T2) resulted in the highest shoot fresh weight, yield, and marketable root yield. Marketable stem diameter was positively influenced by T2 and T4. There were no significant treatment effects on plant height. Hierarchical clustering isolated organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) from other treatments. Principal component analysis revealed two principal components, which together explained 87.77% of the total variance. Organic fertilizer application provided the highest TOC accumulation during the experimental period, whereas NPK fertilization was the most effective in increasing cassava yield in the first year of cultivation\",\"PeriodicalId\":10904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

木薯在巴西是一种重要的社会经济作物,因为它用途广泛,在营养贫乏的土壤中产量高。施肥可以改善土壤质量,进一步提高木薯产量。本研究旨在探讨不同肥源对土壤总有机碳(TOC)和木薯产量指标的影响。该实验在巴西圣塔姆姆的一个家庭农场进行,采用随机分组设计,有四个处理和五个重复。处理如下:T1为未施肥土壤(对照);T2, NPK肥;T3,禽粪;T4是牛粪。分析的变量为土壤TOC、地上部鲜重、株高、可售茎粗、可售根产量和产量。数据进行方差分析、Tukey检验(p < 0.05)、层次聚类和主成分分析。施用有机肥(T3和T4)增加了土壤TOC水平。化肥处理(T2)的地上部鲜重、产量和可售根产量最高。T2和T4对可售茎径有正向影响。处理对株高无显著影响。分层聚类将有机肥(T3和T4)与其他处理分离开来。主成分分析显示两个主成分,共同解释了总方差的87.77%。在种植第一年,施用有机肥的木薯TOC积累量最高,而施用氮磷钾对提高木薯产量最有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cassava yield indicators and total organic carbon in tropical soils under different fertilization treatments
Cassava is a crop of major socioeconomic importance in Brazil because of its versatility and high yield in nutrient-poor soils. Fertilization can improve soil quality and further increase cassava yield. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different fertilizer sources on soil total organic carbon (TOC) and cassava yield indicators. The experiment was conducted on a family farm in Santarém, Brazil, in a randomized block design, with four treatments and five replications. Treatments were as follows: T1, unfertilized soil (control); T2, NPK fertilizer; T3, poultry manure; and T4, cattle manure. The variables analyzed were soil TOC, shoot fresh weight, plant height, marketable stem diameter, marketable root yield, and yield. Data were subjected to analysis of variance, Tukey’s test (p < 0.05), hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis. Application of organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) increased soil TOC levels. Chemical fertilizer treatment (T2) resulted in the highest shoot fresh weight, yield, and marketable root yield. Marketable stem diameter was positively influenced by T2 and T4. There were no significant treatment effects on plant height. Hierarchical clustering isolated organic fertilizers (T3 and T4) from other treatments. Principal component analysis revealed two principal components, which together explained 87.77% of the total variance. Organic fertilizer application provided the highest TOC accumulation during the experimental period, whereas NPK fertilization was the most effective in increasing cassava yield in the first year of cultivation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of malodorous gases emission from wet-end white water with hydrogen peroxide Application of spruce wood flour as a cellulosic-based wood additive for recycled paper applications— A pilot paper machine study Corrosion damage and in-service inspection of retractable sootblower lances in recovery boilers Kraft recovery boiler operation with splash plate and/or beer can nozzles — a case study Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1