{"title":"荷载偏心对混凝土柱强度的影响","authors":"A. Agha, M. H. Rashid","doi":"10.4172/2165-784X.1000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents a theoretical study to determine the effect of the load eccentricity on the reinforced concrete column strength taking into account the variables: amount of eccentricity ratio (e/h=0.1 and 1.0); amount of longitudinal reinforcement ρ%=1% to 8%; concrete compressive strength ( ' 21,28,35,42,63 84 ); c f = and MPa steel yielding strength ( 414 525 ); y f = and MPa the steel reinforcement distance ratiocondition of loading (Uniaxial and Biaxial bending); shape of the cross section (rectangular and circular) and finally the distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides and on four sides. Generally the strength of columns is reduced with existing the load eccentricity and amount of losses in strength increased with increasing the eccentricity amount. The average strength ratio in case of biaxial bending condition is about (82%) of the uniaxial condition in case of (e/h=0.1) and become (55%) in case of (e/h=0.1). For uniaxial bending condition, the average relative column strength is about (75%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (14%) in case of (e/h=0.1); while for biaxial bending condition, the ratio is (60%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (8%) in case of (e/ h=0.1). Increasing of concrete compressive strength ( ' ) c f , steel yielding strength ( ) s γ , steel distance ratio ( ) s γ and amount of longitudinal reinforcement (ρ%) cause increasing in column strength and reducing the losses in column strength. Also the results show great effect of the load eccentricity ratio (e/h) and bending condition (uniaxial and biaxial) on the reduction of column strength. The distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides gives upper limit results and maximum column strength, compared with the case of when the reinforcement distributed on four sides and rectangular section with circular distribution of the reinforcement, while circular columns gives lower limit results and minimum column strength compared with other cases mentioned above.","PeriodicalId":52256,"journal":{"name":"Tumu yu Huanjing Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Load Eccentricity on the Strength of Concrete Columns\",\"authors\":\"A. Agha, M. H. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2165-784X.1000308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presents a theoretical study to determine the effect of the load eccentricity on the reinforced concrete column strength taking into account the variables: amount of eccentricity ratio (e/h=0.1 and 1.0); amount of longitudinal reinforcement ρ%=1% to 8%; concrete compressive strength ( ' 21,28,35,42,63 84 ); c f = and MPa steel yielding strength ( 414 525 ); y f = and MPa the steel reinforcement distance ratiocondition of loading (Uniaxial and Biaxial bending); shape of the cross section (rectangular and circular) and finally the distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides and on four sides. Generally the strength of columns is reduced with existing the load eccentricity and amount of losses in strength increased with increasing the eccentricity amount. The average strength ratio in case of biaxial bending condition is about (82%) of the uniaxial condition in case of (e/h=0.1) and become (55%) in case of (e/h=0.1). For uniaxial bending condition, the average relative column strength is about (75%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (14%) in case of (e/h=0.1); while for biaxial bending condition, the ratio is (60%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (8%) in case of (e/ h=0.1). Increasing of concrete compressive strength ( ' ) c f , steel yielding strength ( ) s γ , steel distance ratio ( ) s γ and amount of longitudinal reinforcement (ρ%) cause increasing in column strength and reducing the losses in column strength. Also the results show great effect of the load eccentricity ratio (e/h) and bending condition (uniaxial and biaxial) on the reduction of column strength. The distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides gives upper limit results and maximum column strength, compared with the case of when the reinforcement distributed on four sides and rectangular section with circular distribution of the reinforcement, while circular columns gives lower limit results and minimum column strength compared with other cases mentioned above.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tumu yu Huanjing Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tumu yu Huanjing Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumu yu Huanjing Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文对考虑偏心比量(e/h=0.1和1.0)的荷载偏心对钢筋混凝土柱强度的影响进行了理论研究;纵向配筋量ρ%=1% ~ 8%;混凝土抗压强度(21、28、35、42、63 84);c f =和MPa钢的屈服强度(414 525);y f =和MPa为钢筋距离比加载条件(单轴和双轴弯曲);截面形状(矩形和圆形),最后在两个相对的边和四个边的钢筋分布。一般情况下,柱的强度随偏心荷载的存在而降低,强度损失量随偏心荷载的增加而增大。当e/h=0.1时,双轴弯曲条件下的平均强度比约为单轴弯曲条件下的82%,当e/h=0.1时,平均强度比变为55%。单轴弯曲条件下,当e/h=0.1时,柱的平均相对强度约为75%,当e/h=0.1时,平均相对强度约为14%;双轴弯曲条件下,(e/h=0.1)为(60%),(e/h=0.1)为(8%)。混凝土抗压强度(′)c f、钢筋屈服强度(′)s γ、钢筋间距比(′)s γ和纵向配筋量(ρ%)的增大使柱强度增大,柱强度损失减小。荷载偏心比(e/h)和弯曲条件(单轴和双轴)对柱强度降低有较大影响。相对两侧配筋可得到柱强度的上限结果和最大值,与四周配筋和矩形截面配筋圆形分布的情况相比,圆形柱可得到柱强度的下限结果和最小值,与上述其他情况相比。
Effect of Load Eccentricity on the Strength of Concrete Columns
This research presents a theoretical study to determine the effect of the load eccentricity on the reinforced concrete column strength taking into account the variables: amount of eccentricity ratio (e/h=0.1 and 1.0); amount of longitudinal reinforcement ρ%=1% to 8%; concrete compressive strength ( ' 21,28,35,42,63 84 ); c f = and MPa steel yielding strength ( 414 525 ); y f = and MPa the steel reinforcement distance ratiocondition of loading (Uniaxial and Biaxial bending); shape of the cross section (rectangular and circular) and finally the distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides and on four sides. Generally the strength of columns is reduced with existing the load eccentricity and amount of losses in strength increased with increasing the eccentricity amount. The average strength ratio in case of biaxial bending condition is about (82%) of the uniaxial condition in case of (e/h=0.1) and become (55%) in case of (e/h=0.1). For uniaxial bending condition, the average relative column strength is about (75%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (14%) in case of (e/h=0.1); while for biaxial bending condition, the ratio is (60%) in case of (e/h=0.1) and (8%) in case of (e/ h=0.1). Increasing of concrete compressive strength ( ' ) c f , steel yielding strength ( ) s γ , steel distance ratio ( ) s γ and amount of longitudinal reinforcement (ρ%) cause increasing in column strength and reducing the losses in column strength. Also the results show great effect of the load eccentricity ratio (e/h) and bending condition (uniaxial and biaxial) on the reduction of column strength. The distribution of the reinforcement on two opposite sides gives upper limit results and maximum column strength, compared with the case of when the reinforcement distributed on four sides and rectangular section with circular distribution of the reinforcement, while circular columns gives lower limit results and minimum column strength compared with other cases mentioned above.