埃塞俄比亚北部Ayder转诊医院外科抗生素预防使用评估

S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚北部Ayder转诊医院外科抗生素预防使用评估","authors":"S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay","doi":"10.4172/1920-4159.1000220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis. \n \nObjective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH). \n \nMethod: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics. \n \nResults: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%). \n \nConclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.","PeriodicalId":15238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization Assessment of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/1920-4159.1000220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis. \\n \\nObjective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH). \\n \\nMethod: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics. \\n \\nResults: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%). \\n \\nConclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/1920-4159.1000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1920-4159.1000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

手术部位感染在患者发病率、死亡率和住院费用方面是一个重大负担,可通过预防措施加以预防。目的:评估艾德尔转诊医院(ARH)外科抗生素预防(SAP)指南的依从率。方法:于2015年3月12日至4月28日进行前瞻性横断面研究。对所有接受手术并符合纳入标准的患者采用数据抽象检查表收集数据。采用SAP指南和CDC伤口分类作为数据评估方案。使用Epidata 3.1和SPSS 16进行数据录入和描述性统计分析。结果:共纳入196例患者,平均年龄37.84岁,其中女性占58.7%。其中,62.2%接受了SAP,但58.2%需要预防。国家标准治疗指南(STG)和美国卫生系统药师学会(ASHP)指南对SAP指南的总依从性分别为21.9%和25%。SAP的选择(国家STG 100% vs ASHP指南89.5%)是与SAP指南偏差最大的参数,其次是持续时间(63.5%)、适应症(19.4%)和剂量(10.4%)。最常用的药物是头孢曲松(85.2%)。结论:目前ARH的实践与SAP指南存在巨大差异。长期使用广谱抗生素是很常见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization Assessment of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia
Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis. Objective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH). Method: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%). Conclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY AND STABILITY OF FUROSEMIDE TABLETS IN TROPICAL STORAGE CONDITIONS: AN IN-VITRO ANALYSIS CARDIOTOXIC POTENCIALOF PIOGLITAZONE/AZOLE ANTIFUNGALS DRUGS INTERACTION IN RATES REPACKAGED PROPRANOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS: PHARMACEUTICAL STABILITY IN TWO DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS Ms. AQUEOUS AND ETHANOLIC EXTRACTS OF TRACHY SPERMUM AMMI EXHIBIT COMPARABLE ANTIDEPRESSANT AND ANXIOLYTIC EFFECT TO IMIPRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND DIAZEPAM POTENTIAL THREATS OF ORDINARY INVESTIGATION AND LITIGATION MODEL OF THE NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU ON THE PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1