S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚北部Ayder转诊医院外科抗生素预防使用评估","authors":"S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay","doi":"10.4172/1920-4159.1000220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis. \n \nObjective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH). \n \nMethod: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics. \n \nResults: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%). \n \nConclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.","PeriodicalId":15238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization Assessment of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Mohamoud, Teshager Aklilu Yesuf, Eskinder Ayalew Sisay\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/1920-4159.1000220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis. \\n \\nObjective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH). \\n \\nMethod: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics. \\n \\nResults: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%). \\n \\nConclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/1920-4159.1000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1920-4159.1000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
摘要
手术部位感染在患者发病率、死亡率和住院费用方面是一个重大负担,可通过预防措施加以预防。目的:评估艾德尔转诊医院(ARH)外科抗生素预防(SAP)指南的依从率。方法:于2015年3月12日至4月28日进行前瞻性横断面研究。对所有接受手术并符合纳入标准的患者采用数据抽象检查表收集数据。采用SAP指南和CDC伤口分类作为数据评估方案。使用Epidata 3.1和SPSS 16进行数据录入和描述性统计分析。结果:共纳入196例患者,平均年龄37.84岁,其中女性占58.7%。其中,62.2%接受了SAP,但58.2%需要预防。国家标准治疗指南(STG)和美国卫生系统药师学会(ASHP)指南对SAP指南的总依从性分别为21.9%和25%。SAP的选择(国家STG 100% vs ASHP指南89.5%)是与SAP指南偏差最大的参数,其次是持续时间(63.5%)、适应症(19.4%)和剂量(10.4%)。最常用的药物是头孢曲松(85.2%)。结论:目前ARH的实践与SAP指南存在巨大差异。长期使用广谱抗生素是很常见的。
Utilization Assessment of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia
Introduction: Surgical site infection represents a significant burden in terms of patients’ morbidity, mortality and hospital costs which can be prevented using prophylaxis.
Objective: To assess rate of compliance to Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines at Ayder Referral Hospital (ARH).
Method: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from 12th March to 28thApril, 2015. Data were collected using data abstraction checklist for all patients who underwent surgery and met inclusion criteria. SAP Guidelines and CDC Wound Classification were used as data assessment protocols. Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 16 were used for data entry and analysis of descriptive statistics.
Results: A total of 196 patients with mean age of 37.84 years were recruited (female, 58.7%). Of these, 62.2% received SAP but prophylaxis was needed in 58.2%. The total compliance to SAP guideline was 21.9% and 25% for national Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) and American Society of Health-system Pharmacist (ASHP) guideline respectively. Selection of SAP (national STG 100% versus ASHP Guideline 89.5%) was the most deviated parameter from SAP guidelines followed by duration (63.5%), indication (19.4%) and dose (10.4%). Most commonly used agent was ceftriaxone (85.2%).
Conclusion: Current practice of ARH is hugely divergent from SAP guidelines. Use of broader spectrum antibiotics for an extended period was common.