宫腔镜术后宫内麻醉减少术后疼痛——双盲随机对照试验

K. Mahomed, J. McLean, Muhtashim Ahmed, B. Zolotarev, N. Shaddock
{"title":"宫腔镜术后宫内麻醉减少术后疼痛——双盲随机对照试验","authors":"K. Mahomed, J. McLean, Muhtashim Ahmed, B. Zolotarev, N. Shaddock","doi":"10.1097/sa.0000000000000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial sought to assess whether intrauterine levobupivacaine reduced post hysteroscopy pain and need for analgesics and allowed earlier return to normal activity. During January 2013 to December 2015, 438 women were recruited into this study, with 224 in the intervention group and 214 in the control group. Levobupivacaine was chosen as the intrauterine anesthetic in the intervention group because of its safety profile. The control group received intrauterine normal saline","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrauterine Anaesthetic After Hysteroscopy to Reduce Post-operative Pain—A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"K. Mahomed, J. McLean, Muhtashim Ahmed, B. Zolotarev, N. Shaddock\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sa.0000000000000304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial sought to assess whether intrauterine levobupivacaine reduced post hysteroscopy pain and need for analgesics and allowed earlier return to normal activity. During January 2013 to December 2015, 438 women were recruited into this study, with 224 in the intervention group and 214 in the control group. Levobupivacaine was chosen as the intrauterine anesthetic in the intervention group because of its safety profile. The control group received intrauterine normal saline\",\"PeriodicalId\":22104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sa.0000000000000304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sa.0000000000000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验旨在评估子宫内左布比卡因是否能减轻宫腔镜检查后的疼痛和对止痛药的需求,并使其早日恢复正常活动。2013年1月至2015年12月,共招募438名女性参与本研究,其中干预组224名,对照组214名。考虑到左布比卡因的安全性,干预组选择左布比卡因作为宫内麻醉剂。对照组给予子宫生理盐水治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intrauterine Anaesthetic After Hysteroscopy to Reduce Post-operative Pain—A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial sought to assess whether intrauterine levobupivacaine reduced post hysteroscopy pain and need for analgesics and allowed earlier return to normal activity. During January 2013 to December 2015, 438 women were recruited into this study, with 224 in the intervention group and 214 in the control group. Levobupivacaine was chosen as the intrauterine anesthetic in the intervention group because of its safety profile. The control group received intrauterine normal saline
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1