平行的职业轨迹比单一的职业轨迹对专业人士的伤害更大吗?

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Australian Journal of Career Development Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1177/10384162221110366
Maria Candida Baumer de Azevedo, Sara De Hauw, J. Semeijn, Tinka van Vuuren
{"title":"平行的职业轨迹比单一的职业轨迹对专业人士的伤害更大吗?","authors":"Maria Candida Baumer de Azevedo, Sara De Hauw, J. Semeijn, Tinka van Vuuren","doi":"10.1177/10384162221110366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parallel career tracks have become more prevalent today, especially in Brazil, where more than a quarter of all postgrads have one. Despite its growing popularity, little research has tapped into this new career phenomenon. This study examines whether having a parallel career track leads to negative work outcomes related to sustainable careers, such as higher absenteeism and lower engagement, in comparison to a single career track. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were gathered from 380 and 102 Brazilian professionals respectively, who filled out an online survey. A normal and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance were used to examine whether work outcomes differed between those with parallel career tracks versus single career tracks. The findings indicate that parallel career tracks do not have different effects on individual sustainable employability outcomes when compared to single career tracks, including employability, engagement, absenteeism, presenteeism, and burnout. Therefore, organizations can face this new career trend without reluctance as it does not harm individual work outcomes related to sustainable careers. This study contributes significantly to improving the understanding of this new career format by examining the impact of parallel career tracks on individual work outcomes through a longitudinal design.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"11 1","pages":"149 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do parallel career tracks harm professionals more than single career tracks?\",\"authors\":\"Maria Candida Baumer de Azevedo, Sara De Hauw, J. Semeijn, Tinka van Vuuren\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10384162221110366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parallel career tracks have become more prevalent today, especially in Brazil, where more than a quarter of all postgrads have one. Despite its growing popularity, little research has tapped into this new career phenomenon. This study examines whether having a parallel career track leads to negative work outcomes related to sustainable careers, such as higher absenteeism and lower engagement, in comparison to a single career track. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were gathered from 380 and 102 Brazilian professionals respectively, who filled out an online survey. A normal and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance were used to examine whether work outcomes differed between those with parallel career tracks versus single career tracks. The findings indicate that parallel career tracks do not have different effects on individual sustainable employability outcomes when compared to single career tracks, including employability, engagement, absenteeism, presenteeism, and burnout. Therefore, organizations can face this new career trend without reluctance as it does not harm individual work outcomes related to sustainable careers. This study contributes significantly to improving the understanding of this new career format by examining the impact of parallel career tracks on individual work outcomes through a longitudinal design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162221110366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162221110366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,平行的职业轨迹变得更加普遍,尤其是在巴西,超过四分之一的研究生都有平行的职业轨迹。尽管它越来越受欢迎,但很少有研究针对这一新的职业现象。这项研究考察了与单一职业轨迹相比,平行职业轨迹是否会导致与可持续职业相关的负面工作结果,比如更高的缺勤率和更低的敬业度。横断面和纵向数据分别来自380名和102名巴西专业人士,他们填写了一份在线调查。采用正态和重复测量多变量方差分析来检验平行职业轨迹与单一职业轨迹的工作结果是否存在差异。研究结果表明,与单一职业轨迹相比,平行职业轨迹对个体可持续就业能力(包括就业能力、敬业度、缺勤率、出勤率和职业倦怠)的影响并不显著。因此,企业可以毫不犹豫地面对这种新的职业趋势,因为它不会损害与可持续职业相关的个人工作成果。本研究通过纵向设计考察平行职业轨迹对个人工作成果的影响,有助于提高对这种新型职业模式的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do parallel career tracks harm professionals more than single career tracks?
Parallel career tracks have become more prevalent today, especially in Brazil, where more than a quarter of all postgrads have one. Despite its growing popularity, little research has tapped into this new career phenomenon. This study examines whether having a parallel career track leads to negative work outcomes related to sustainable careers, such as higher absenteeism and lower engagement, in comparison to a single career track. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were gathered from 380 and 102 Brazilian professionals respectively, who filled out an online survey. A normal and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance were used to examine whether work outcomes differed between those with parallel career tracks versus single career tracks. The findings indicate that parallel career tracks do not have different effects on individual sustainable employability outcomes when compared to single career tracks, including employability, engagement, absenteeism, presenteeism, and burnout. Therefore, organizations can face this new career trend without reluctance as it does not harm individual work outcomes related to sustainable careers. This study contributes significantly to improving the understanding of this new career format by examining the impact of parallel career tracks on individual work outcomes through a longitudinal design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo. The relationship between living in regional, remote and rural areas and post-school outcomes: A scoping review Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter? ‘Careering’ – toward radicalism in radical times: Links to human security and sustainable livelihoods Understanding the transition from psychology graduate to post-graduate counselling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1