测量工具Mini- cex(迷你临床评估练习)作为日惹穆罕默德大学教学医院护生评估工具的开发

Syafrina Arbaani Djuria, .. Moh.Afandi
{"title":"测量工具Mini- cex(迷你临床评估练习)作为日惹穆罕默德大学教学医院护生评估工具的开发","authors":"Syafrina Arbaani Djuria, .. Moh.Afandi","doi":"10.5176/2345-718X_1.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise) was a method of evaluation to assess the clinical skills of students through direct observation and provide constructive feedback. To develop a measure tool mini-CEX as an effective measure of evaluation, it is necessary to the validity and reliability of the accuracy of the mini-CEX to improving students’ learning and develop clinical education program. In the developing country, very few studies have been designed and conducted on Mini-CEX of Nursing. Moreover, in Indonesia, there is no instrument Mini-CEX of Nursing yet. Generally, this research aims to develop the use of the mini-CEX measure as professional nurses performance evaluation tool. In particular aims (a) to analyze the mini-CEX measure existing in the profession nurses, (b) to analyze the mini-CEX focused on nursing education, (c) for the validity and reliability of the tool with the mini-CEX as educational evaluation tools Nurses. This research was a descriptive quantitative method with cross sectional design. It developed an assessment tool in measuring competencies nursing students from the competencies published by PSIK UMY, 2011 adopted of ABIM (American Board of Internal Medicine), 1995; Taiwan, 2011; and British Dermatological Nursing Group. Content validity was done by the expert review to consist of 4 people are 2 nursing education and 2 medical education. The result validity are trial with used questionnaire. The respondents were 35 preceptors in the teaching hospitals of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The reliability test was done by Cronbach alpha test. From the initial assessment tool which had 51 items, it became 47 items after the expert review and the reliability test. The computed Cronbach’s alpha for the 47-item scale for mini-CEX was 0.988, indicating high internal consistency. So the instrument is reliable for measuring the competencies of nursing students. This research concluded that the assessment tool in measuring competencies of the nursing student had demonstrated evidence of internal consistency reliability and content validity. It provided an objective tool for assessing the nursing students competencies during do clinical education program.","PeriodicalId":91870,"journal":{"name":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Measurement Tool Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise) as an Evaluation Tool of Nursing Students in Teaching Hospital of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta\",\"authors\":\"Syafrina Arbaani Djuria, .. Moh.Afandi\",\"doi\":\"10.5176/2345-718X_1.1.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise) was a method of evaluation to assess the clinical skills of students through direct observation and provide constructive feedback. To develop a measure tool mini-CEX as an effective measure of evaluation, it is necessary to the validity and reliability of the accuracy of the mini-CEX to improving students’ learning and develop clinical education program. In the developing country, very few studies have been designed and conducted on Mini-CEX of Nursing. Moreover, in Indonesia, there is no instrument Mini-CEX of Nursing yet. Generally, this research aims to develop the use of the mini-CEX measure as professional nurses performance evaluation tool. In particular aims (a) to analyze the mini-CEX measure existing in the profession nurses, (b) to analyze the mini-CEX focused on nursing education, (c) for the validity and reliability of the tool with the mini-CEX as educational evaluation tools Nurses. This research was a descriptive quantitative method with cross sectional design. It developed an assessment tool in measuring competencies nursing students from the competencies published by PSIK UMY, 2011 adopted of ABIM (American Board of Internal Medicine), 1995; Taiwan, 2011; and British Dermatological Nursing Group. Content validity was done by the expert review to consist of 4 people are 2 nursing education and 2 medical education. The result validity are trial with used questionnaire. The respondents were 35 preceptors in the teaching hospitals of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The reliability test was done by Cronbach alpha test. From the initial assessment tool which had 51 items, it became 47 items after the expert review and the reliability test. The computed Cronbach’s alpha for the 47-item scale for mini-CEX was 0.988, indicating high internal consistency. So the instrument is reliable for measuring the competencies of nursing students. This research concluded that the assessment tool in measuring competencies of the nursing student had demonstrated evidence of internal consistency reliability and content validity. It provided an objective tool for assessing the nursing students competencies during do clinical education program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GSTF journal of nursing and health care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GSTF journal of nursing and health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-718X_1.1.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-718X_1.1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Mini- cex (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise)是一种通过直接观察来评估学生临床技能并提供建设性反馈的评估方法。开发一种测量工具mini-CEX作为一种有效的评价手段,需要提高mini-CEX准确性的效度和信度,以提高学生的学习水平和制定临床教育计划。在发展中国家,很少有关于护理的Mini-CEX的研究被设计和实施。此外,在印度尼西亚,还没有Mini-CEX护理仪器。总的来说,本研究旨在开发使用mini-CEX测量作为专业护士绩效评估工具。特别的目的是(a)分析存在于专业护士中的mini-CEX测量,(b)分析专注于护理教育的mini-CEX, (c)以mini-CEX作为教育评估工具的工具的效度和信度。本研究采用横断面设计的描述性定量方法。从2011年PSIK UMY出版的《胜任力》和1995年ABIM (American Board of Internal Medicine)出版的《胜任力》中开发了一套衡量护理学生胜任力的评估工具;台湾,2011;和英国皮肤护理小组。内容效度由4人组成,分别为2名护理学历和2名医学学历。用问卷对结果的效度进行了检验。答复者是日惹穆罕默德大学教学医院的35名教师。信度检验采用Cronbach alpha检验。评估工具由最初的51个项目,经过专家评审和信度检验,最终增加到47个项目。47项mini-CEX量表的计算Cronbach 's alpha值为0.988,内部一致性较高。因此,该工具对护生胜任力的测量是可靠的。本研究的结论是,测评工具在衡量护生胜任力方面具有内部一致性、信度和内容效度的证据。为临床护理专业学生的能力评估提供了客观的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Measurement Tool Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise) as an Evaluation Tool of Nursing Students in Teaching Hospital of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise) was a method of evaluation to assess the clinical skills of students through direct observation and provide constructive feedback. To develop a measure tool mini-CEX as an effective measure of evaluation, it is necessary to the validity and reliability of the accuracy of the mini-CEX to improving students’ learning and develop clinical education program. In the developing country, very few studies have been designed and conducted on Mini-CEX of Nursing. Moreover, in Indonesia, there is no instrument Mini-CEX of Nursing yet. Generally, this research aims to develop the use of the mini-CEX measure as professional nurses performance evaluation tool. In particular aims (a) to analyze the mini-CEX measure existing in the profession nurses, (b) to analyze the mini-CEX focused on nursing education, (c) for the validity and reliability of the tool with the mini-CEX as educational evaluation tools Nurses. This research was a descriptive quantitative method with cross sectional design. It developed an assessment tool in measuring competencies nursing students from the competencies published by PSIK UMY, 2011 adopted of ABIM (American Board of Internal Medicine), 1995; Taiwan, 2011; and British Dermatological Nursing Group. Content validity was done by the expert review to consist of 4 people are 2 nursing education and 2 medical education. The result validity are trial with used questionnaire. The respondents were 35 preceptors in the teaching hospitals of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The reliability test was done by Cronbach alpha test. From the initial assessment tool which had 51 items, it became 47 items after the expert review and the reliability test. The computed Cronbach’s alpha for the 47-item scale for mini-CEX was 0.988, indicating high internal consistency. So the instrument is reliable for measuring the competencies of nursing students. This research concluded that the assessment tool in measuring competencies of the nursing student had demonstrated evidence of internal consistency reliability and content validity. It provided an objective tool for assessing the nursing students competencies during do clinical education program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Surrogacy Morally Acceptable in Hong Kong? Coping Behaviors and Collaboration among Staff of Multiple Occupation Classifications during Norovirus Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with and without heart failure Management of Volunteer Activities Among Elderly Persons Compassion Fatigue among Healthcare Personnel in Acute Care Contexts: An Integrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1