Minerva:浏览器API模糊测试与动态模式引用分析

Chijin Zhou, Quan Zhang, Mingzhe Wang, Lihua Guo, Jie Liang, Zhe Liu, Mathias Payer, Yuting Jiang
{"title":"Minerva:浏览器API模糊测试与动态模式引用分析","authors":"Chijin Zhou, Quan Zhang, Mingzhe Wang, Lihua Guo, Jie Liang, Zhe Liu, Mathias Payer, Yuting Jiang","doi":"10.1145/3540250.3549107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Browser APIs are essential to the modern web experience. Due to their large number and complexity, they vastly expand the attack surface of browsers. To detect vulnerabilities in these APIs, fuzzers generate test cases with a large amount of random API invocations. However, the massive search space formed by arbitrary API combinations hinders their effectiveness: since randomly-picked API invocations unlikely interfere with each other (i.e., compute on partially shared data), few interesting API interactions are explored. Consequently, reducing the search space by revealing inter-API relations is a major challenge in browser fuzzing. We propose Minerva, an efficient browser fuzzer for browser API bug detection. The key idea is to leverage API interference relations to reduce redundancy and improve coverage. Minerva consists of two modules: dynamic mod-ref analysis and guided code generation. Before fuzzing starts, the dynamic mod-ref analysis module builds an API interference graph. It first automatically identifies individual browser APIs from the browser’s code base. Next, it instruments the browser to dynamically collect mod-ref relations between APIs. During fuzzing, the guided code generation module synthesizes highly-relevant API invocations guided by the mod-ref relations. We evaluate Minerva on three mainstream browsers, i.e. Safari, FireFox, and Chromium. Compared to state-of-the-art fuzzers, Minerva improves edge coverage by 19.63% to 229.62% and finds 2x to 3x more unique bugs. Besides, Minerva has discovered 35 previously-unknown bugs out of which 20 have been fixed with 5 CVEs assigned and acknowledged by browser vendors.","PeriodicalId":68155,"journal":{"name":"软件产业与工程","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minerva: browser API fuzzing with dynamic mod-ref analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chijin Zhou, Quan Zhang, Mingzhe Wang, Lihua Guo, Jie Liang, Zhe Liu, Mathias Payer, Yuting Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3540250.3549107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Browser APIs are essential to the modern web experience. Due to their large number and complexity, they vastly expand the attack surface of browsers. To detect vulnerabilities in these APIs, fuzzers generate test cases with a large amount of random API invocations. However, the massive search space formed by arbitrary API combinations hinders their effectiveness: since randomly-picked API invocations unlikely interfere with each other (i.e., compute on partially shared data), few interesting API interactions are explored. Consequently, reducing the search space by revealing inter-API relations is a major challenge in browser fuzzing. We propose Minerva, an efficient browser fuzzer for browser API bug detection. The key idea is to leverage API interference relations to reduce redundancy and improve coverage. Minerva consists of two modules: dynamic mod-ref analysis and guided code generation. Before fuzzing starts, the dynamic mod-ref analysis module builds an API interference graph. It first automatically identifies individual browser APIs from the browser’s code base. Next, it instruments the browser to dynamically collect mod-ref relations between APIs. During fuzzing, the guided code generation module synthesizes highly-relevant API invocations guided by the mod-ref relations. We evaluate Minerva on three mainstream browsers, i.e. Safari, FireFox, and Chromium. Compared to state-of-the-art fuzzers, Minerva improves edge coverage by 19.63% to 229.62% and finds 2x to 3x more unique bugs. Besides, Minerva has discovered 35 previously-unknown bugs out of which 20 have been fixed with 5 CVEs assigned and acknowledged by browser vendors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"软件产业与工程\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"软件产业与工程\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3549107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"软件产业与工程","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3549107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

浏览器api对现代网络体验至关重要。由于它们的数量和复杂性,它们极大地扩展了浏览器的攻击面。为了检测这些API中的漏洞,fuzzers使用大量随机API调用生成测试用例。然而,由任意API组合形成的巨大搜索空间阻碍了它们的有效性:由于随机选择的API调用不太可能相互干扰(即,对部分共享数据进行计算),因此很少有有趣的API交互被探索。因此,通过揭示api之间的关系来减少搜索空间是浏览器模糊测试的主要挑战。我们提出Minerva,一个高效的浏览器模糊器,用于浏览器API错误检测。关键思想是利用API干扰关系来减少冗余并提高覆盖范围。Minerva由两个模块组成:动态模型引用分析和引导代码生成。在模糊测试开始之前,动态模态参考分析模块构建API干扰图。它首先从浏览器的代码库中自动识别各个浏览器api。接下来,它使浏览器能够动态地收集api之间的mode -ref关系。在模糊测试期间,被引导的代码生成模块在模型引用关系的引导下合成高度相关的API调用。我们在三种主流浏览器上对Minerva进行了评估,即Safari、FireFox和Chromium。与最先进的fuzzers相比,Minerva将边缘覆盖率提高了19.63%至229.62%,并发现了2到3倍的独特漏洞。此外,Minerva还发现了35个以前未知的错误,其中20个已经修复,其中5个cve被浏览器供应商分配并承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minerva: browser API fuzzing with dynamic mod-ref analysis
Browser APIs are essential to the modern web experience. Due to their large number and complexity, they vastly expand the attack surface of browsers. To detect vulnerabilities in these APIs, fuzzers generate test cases with a large amount of random API invocations. However, the massive search space formed by arbitrary API combinations hinders their effectiveness: since randomly-picked API invocations unlikely interfere with each other (i.e., compute on partially shared data), few interesting API interactions are explored. Consequently, reducing the search space by revealing inter-API relations is a major challenge in browser fuzzing. We propose Minerva, an efficient browser fuzzer for browser API bug detection. The key idea is to leverage API interference relations to reduce redundancy and improve coverage. Minerva consists of two modules: dynamic mod-ref analysis and guided code generation. Before fuzzing starts, the dynamic mod-ref analysis module builds an API interference graph. It first automatically identifies individual browser APIs from the browser’s code base. Next, it instruments the browser to dynamically collect mod-ref relations between APIs. During fuzzing, the guided code generation module synthesizes highly-relevant API invocations guided by the mod-ref relations. We evaluate Minerva on three mainstream browsers, i.e. Safari, FireFox, and Chromium. Compared to state-of-the-art fuzzers, Minerva improves edge coverage by 19.63% to 229.62% and finds 2x to 3x more unique bugs. Besides, Minerva has discovered 35 previously-unknown bugs out of which 20 have been fixed with 5 CVEs assigned and acknowledged by browser vendors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
676
期刊最新文献
Improving Grading Outcomes in Software Engineering Projects Through Automated Contributions Summaries GRADESTYLE: GitHub-Integrated and Automated Assessment of Java Code Style Improving Assessment of Programming Pattern Knowledge through Code Editing and Revision Designing for Real People: Teaching Agility through User-Centric Service Design Using Focus to Personalise Learning and Feedback in Software Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1